On the manipulability of equitable voting rules ✩

被引:2
|
作者
Kivinen, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Dept Econ, Graz, Austria
关键词
Robust group strategy-proofness; Majority voting; Equitable voting rules; GROUP STRATEGY-PROOFNESS; MANIPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider the equity-manipulability trade-off when voting over two alternatives. Pairwise equity is a weakening of anonymity requiring certain permutations of the voters' identities to preserve the outcome of the election. B-robust group strategy-proofness (t-RGSP) and fine robust group strategy-proofness (FRGSP) are notions of group strategy-proofness that allow voters to have different beliefs about players' types (Kivinen and Tumennasan, 2021). Our main results show that, under mild conditions, for pairwise equitable voting rules anonymity is equivalent to 2-RGSP, 3-RGSP, and FRGSP. In this way, anonymity is special in its equity and non-manipulability. These results follow from several preliminary results, one of which equates 2-RGSP to comonotonicity and swap-robustness. Finally, we consider the manipulability of k-unanimous rules, and 2-RGSP when agents can be indifferent and abstain.& COPY; 2023 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons .org /licenses /by /4 .0/).
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 302
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The learnability of voting rules
    Procaccia, Ariel D.
    Zohar, Aviv
    Peleg, Yoni
    Rosenschein, Jeffrey S.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2009, 173 (12-13) : 1133 - 1149
  • [42] Linear Voting Rules
    Gruener, Hans Peter
    Troeger, Thomas
    ECONOMETRICA, 2019, 87 (06) : 2037 - 2077
  • [43] Optimal Voting Rules
    Gershkov, Alex
    Moldovanu, Benny
    Shi, Xianwen
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2017, 84 (02): : 688 - 717
  • [45] Some Further Results on the Manipulability of Social Choice Rules
    Pierre Favardin
    Dominique Lepelley
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2006, 26 : 485 - 509
  • [46] Some further results on the manipulability of social choice rules
    Favardin, Pierre
    Lepelley, Dominique
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2006, 26 (03) : 485 - 509
  • [47] Evaluative voting or classical voting rules: Does it make a difference? Empirical evidence for consensus among voting rules
    Darmann, Andreas
    Grundner, Julia
    Klamler, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 59 : 345 - 353
  • [48] Evaluation of the Degree of Manipulability of Positional Aggregation Procedures in a Dynamic Voting Model
    Karabekyan, Daniel
    Yakuba, Viacheslav
    HUMAN-CENTRIC DECISION AND NEGOTIATION SUPPORT FOR SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, GDN 2024, 2024, 509 : 102 - 113
  • [49] Conformity and truthful voting under different voting rules
    Bernardo Moreno
    María del Pino Ramos-Sosa
    Ismael Rodriguez-Lara
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2019, 53 : 261 - 282
  • [50] Conformity and truthful voting under different voting rules
    Moreno, Bernardo
    Ramos Sosa, Maria del Pino
    Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2019, 53 (02) : 261 - 282