On the manipulability of equitable voting rules ✩

被引:2
|
作者
Kivinen, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Dept Econ, Graz, Austria
关键词
Robust group strategy-proofness; Majority voting; Equitable voting rules; GROUP STRATEGY-PROOFNESS; MANIPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider the equity-manipulability trade-off when voting over two alternatives. Pairwise equity is a weakening of anonymity requiring certain permutations of the voters' identities to preserve the outcome of the election. B-robust group strategy-proofness (t-RGSP) and fine robust group strategy-proofness (FRGSP) are notions of group strategy-proofness that allow voters to have different beliefs about players' types (Kivinen and Tumennasan, 2021). Our main results show that, under mild conditions, for pairwise equitable voting rules anonymity is equivalent to 2-RGSP, 3-RGSP, and FRGSP. In this way, anonymity is special in its equity and non-manipulability. These results follow from several preliminary results, one of which equates 2-RGSP to comonotonicity and swap-robustness. Finally, we consider the manipulability of k-unanimous rules, and 2-RGSP when agents can be indifferent and abstain.& COPY; 2023 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons .org /licenses /by /4 .0/).
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 302
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing Voting by Committees According to Their Manipulability
    Pablo Arribillaga, R.
    Masso, Jordi
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2017, 9 (04) : 74 - 107
  • [22] Manipulability of consular election rules
    Ianovski, Egor
    Wilson, Mark C.
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2019, 52 (02) : 363 - 393
  • [23] Manipulability of consular election rules
    Egor Ianovski
    Mark C. Wilson
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2019, 52 : 363 - 393
  • [24] On the manipulability of efficient exchange rules
    Tierney, Ryan
    THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 14 (01): : 15 - 38
  • [25] AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE RELATIVE MANIPULABILITY OF 4 VOTING SYSTEMS
    CHAMBERLIN, JR
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1985, 30 (04): : 195 - 203
  • [26] An Empirical Study of the Manipulability of Single Transferable Voting
    Walsh, Toby
    ECAI 2010 - 19TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 215 : 256 - 261
  • [27] The manipulability of matching rules via segmentation
    Sertel, Murat R.
    Ozkal-Sanver, Ipek
    ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 30 (03) : 473 - 491
  • [28] On the degree of manipulability of social choice rules
    Aleskerov, FT
    Kurbanov, E
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1998, 59 (10) : 1460 - 1468
  • [29] The Manipulability of Matching Rules via Segmentation
    Murat R. Sertel
    İpek Özkal-Sanver
    Economic Theory, 2007, 30 : 473 - 491
  • [30] Compensation rules are equitable
    Jegodzinski, Sybille
    RADIOLOGE, 2010, 50 (08): : 735 - 735