The Underappreciated Placebo Effects and Responses in Randomized Controlled Trials on Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Hu, Tengyue [1 ,2 ]
Long, Youlin [2 ,3 ]
Wei, Leting [4 ]
Zheng, Yurong [4 ]
Tong, Yi [4 ]
Yuan, Mei [4 ]
Liu, Chang [1 ]
Wang, Xinyi [3 ]
Lin, Yifei [5 ]
Guo, Qiong [2 ]
Huang, Jin [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Du, Liang [2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Med Device Regulatory Res & Evaluat Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chinese Evidence Based Med Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Precis Med Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, 37 Guoxuexiang Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Neck pain; Pain measurement; Rehabilitation; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.013
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To quantify placebo effects and responses in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on neck pain and explore how they would influence the treatment of neck pain.Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the inception of August 15, 2021, to identify relevant RCTs.Study Selection and Data Extraction: The abstracts and full texts of potential studies were independently screened, and data extraction was also independently performed by 2 researchers. Scales of the score measuring neck pain and the scores both at baseline and the endpoint were extracted.Data Synthesis: A total of 60 RCTs were included. The mean improvement in the pain score after placebo treatment was 15.65 (mean difference [MD]=-15.65, 95% confidence interval; CI [-19.19,-12.12]; P<.05), which we defined as the placebo response. In the active groups, it was 25.91 (MD=-25.91, 95% CI [-29.15,-22.68]; P<.05), and in the no-treatment groups, it was 5.80 (MD=-5.80, 95% CI [13.28, 1.69]; P=.13). Using the 3 MDs from the 3 groups, the placebo effect was calculated to account for 38.0% of the pain score improvement in the active group.Conclusions: The pain scores of patients with neck pain were reduced after treatment with placebos, but the magnitude of pain score reduction was not clinically significant enough. The 38.0% amount of pain score reduction in patients treated with active interventions was caused by placebo. Interventions with considerable clinically significance for neck pain were still required.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1131
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Telemedicine in Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Buonanno, Pasquale
    Marra, Annachiara
    Iacovazzo, Carmine
    Franco, Massimo
    De Simone, Stefania
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (03) : 226 - 233
  • [32] Physiological Responses to Heat Acclimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Rahimi, Gholam R. Mohammed
    Albanaqi, Alsaeedi L.
    Van der Touw, Tom
    Smart, Neil A.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (02) : 316 - 326
  • [33] The placebo effect of sham rhinologic procedures in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Monaghan, Neil P.
    Duckett, Kelsey A.
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Massey, Abigail A.
    Rathi, Vinay
    Soler, Zachary M.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2024, 14 (12) : 1929 - 1933
  • [34] Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised, controlled trials of medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Faraone, Stephen, V
    Newcorn, Jeffrey H.
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Brandeis, Daniel
    Kaiser, Anna
    Hohmann, Sarah
    Haege, Alexander
    Cortese, Samuele
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 27 (01) : 212 - 219
  • [35] Evaluating the Response to Placebo in Randomized Controlled Trials of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Ma Ai Thanda
    Altayar, Osama
    Hamdeh, Shadi
    Takyar, Varun K.
    Rotman, Yaron
    Safadi, Rifaat
    Etzion, Ohad
    Raitzu, Vlad
    Lu, Shelly C.
    Prokop, Larry
    Murad, Mohammad H.
    Noureddin, Mazen
    HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 66 : 1128A - 1129A
  • [36] PLACEBO EFFECT IN THE TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Abdullah, N.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2015, 74 : 263 - 263
  • [37] Suvorexant for Primary Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Kishi, Taro
    Matsunaga, Shinji
    Iwata, Nakao
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [38] Nocebo In Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Varma, Adithya
    Zis, Panagiotis
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (15)
  • [39] Galcanezumab for the Management of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Abu-Zaid, Ahmed
    AlBatati, Saud K.
    AlHossan, Abdullah M.
    AlMatrody, Rayan A.
    AlGzi, Ayman
    Al-Sharief, Rayan A.
    Alsobyani, Faris M.
    Almubarak, Amena F.
    Alatiyah, Nadine S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [40] Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised, controlled trials of medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stephen V. Faraone
    Jeffrey H. Newcorn
    Andrea Cipriani
    Daniel Brandeis
    Anna Kaiser
    Sarah Hohmann
    Alexander Haege
    Samuele Cortese
    Molecular Psychiatry, 2022, 27 : 212 - 219