The Underappreciated Placebo Effects and Responses in Randomized Controlled Trials on Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Hu, Tengyue [1 ,2 ]
Long, Youlin [2 ,3 ]
Wei, Leting [4 ]
Zheng, Yurong [4 ]
Tong, Yi [4 ]
Yuan, Mei [4 ]
Liu, Chang [1 ]
Wang, Xinyi [3 ]
Lin, Yifei [5 ]
Guo, Qiong [2 ]
Huang, Jin [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Du, Liang [2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Med Device Regulatory Res & Evaluat Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chinese Evidence Based Med Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Precis Med Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, 37 Guoxuexiang Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Neck pain; Pain measurement; Rehabilitation; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.013
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To quantify placebo effects and responses in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on neck pain and explore how they would influence the treatment of neck pain.Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the inception of August 15, 2021, to identify relevant RCTs.Study Selection and Data Extraction: The abstracts and full texts of potential studies were independently screened, and data extraction was also independently performed by 2 researchers. Scales of the score measuring neck pain and the scores both at baseline and the endpoint were extracted.Data Synthesis: A total of 60 RCTs were included. The mean improvement in the pain score after placebo treatment was 15.65 (mean difference [MD]=-15.65, 95% confidence interval; CI [-19.19,-12.12]; P<.05), which we defined as the placebo response. In the active groups, it was 25.91 (MD=-25.91, 95% CI [-29.15,-22.68]; P<.05), and in the no-treatment groups, it was 5.80 (MD=-5.80, 95% CI [13.28, 1.69]; P=.13). Using the 3 MDs from the 3 groups, the placebo effect was calculated to account for 38.0% of the pain score improvement in the active group.Conclusions: The pain scores of patients with neck pain were reduced after treatment with placebos, but the magnitude of pain score reduction was not clinically significant enough. The 38.0% amount of pain score reduction in patients treated with active interventions was caused by placebo. Interventions with considerable clinically significance for neck pain were still required.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1131
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pain neuroscience education for reducing pain and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Long-Huei
    Lin, Ting-Yu
    Chang, Ke-Vin
    Wu, Wei-Ting
    Ozcakar, Levent
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 28 (02) : 231 - 243
  • [22] The effects of shoes and insoles for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kong, Lingjun
    Zhou, Xin
    Huang, Qian
    Zhu, Qingguang
    Zheng, Yu
    Tang, Cheng
    Li, Jing Xian
    Fang, Min
    RESEARCH IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 28 (04) : 572 - 587
  • [23] The effects of acupuncture versus sham/placebo acupuncture for insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Jinhuan
    He, Yuhai
    Huang, Xingxian
    Liu, Yongfeng
    Yu, Haibo
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 41
  • [24] Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Heidemarie Haller
    Romy Lauche
    Tobias Sundberg
    Gustav Dobos
    Holger Cramer
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [25] Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Orhurhu, Mariam Salisu
    Bhatia, Anuj
    Cohen, Steven P.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (01): : 241 - 254
  • [26] REHABILITATION INTERVENTIONS FOR NEUROPATHIC PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Backryd, Emmanuel
    Ghafouri, Nazdar
    Gerdle, Bjorn
    Dragioti, Elena
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2024, 56
  • [27] Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Haller, Heidemarie
    Lauche, Romy
    Sundberg, Tobias
    Dobos, Gustav
    Cramer, Holger
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [28] Battlefield Acupuncture for Adult Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Juan
    Ganesh, Ravindra
    Wu, Qinglong
    Li, Langping
    Ogletree, Sandra P.
    Del Fabro, Anna S.
    Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind L.
    Xiong, Donglin
    Bauer, Brent A.
    Chon, Tony Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01): : 25 - 40
  • [29] Intrathecal dexmedetomidine and postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Paramasivan, Ambika
    Lopez-Olivio, Angeles M.
    Foong, Theng W.
    Tan, Yi W.
    Yap, Andrea P. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 24 (07) : 1215 - 1227
  • [30] Acupressure for labor pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Yao
    Xiang, Xiang-Yin
    Chin, Kien Howe Robert
    Gao, Jing
    Wu, Junmei
    Lao, Lixing
    Chen, Haiyong
    ACUPUNCTURE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 39 (04) : 243 - 252