Expanded modelling scenarios to understand the role of offshore wind in decarbonizing the United States

被引:6
|
作者
Beiter, Philipp [1 ]
Mai, Trieu [1 ]
Mowers, Matthew
Bistline, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41560-023-01364-y
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
An assessment of decarbonization pathways in energy models reveals fundamental limitations in representing factors that are relevant for practical decision-making. Although these modelling limitations are widely acknowledged, their impact on the deployment of individual power generation types is not well understood. As a result, the societal value from such generation types could be vastly misrepresented. Here we explore a wide spectrum of factors that impact offshore wind deployment in the United States using a detailed capacity expansion model. Many factors prescribe a large future role for offshore wind, yet this diverges from what models often show. We extend the typically narrow modelling context through high spatial resolution, several cost and transmission possibilities and various energy-sector policies. We estimate offshore wind to constitute 1-8% (31-256 gigawatts) of total US generation by 2050. This wide range suggests an uncertain but potentially important regional role. Our expansive scenarios demonstrate how to address many limitations of decarbonization modelling. Offshore wind will play a key role in decarbonized power systems, but pathway modelling sometimes overlooks critical aspects of its deployment. Beiter et al. use a detailed capacity expansion model to explore different scenarios with high spatial resolution to understand the regional role for offshore wind in the USA.
引用
收藏
页码:1240 / 1249
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Review of design conditions applicable to offshore wind energy systems in the United States
    Manwell, J. F.
    Elkinton, C. N.
    Rogers, A. L.
    McGowan, J. G.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (02): : 210 - 234
  • [22] A comparative assessment of proposed offshore wind power demonstration projects in the United States
    Bates, Alison
    Firestone, Jeremy
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 10 : 192 - 205
  • [23] ANALYSIS OF WIND SPEED SHEAR AND TURBULENCE LIDAR MEASUREMENTS TO SUPPORT OFFSHORE WIND IN THE NORTHEAST UNITED STATES
    Viselli, Anthony
    Faessler, Nathan
    Filippelli, Matthew
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 1ST INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE WIND TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, 2018, 2018,
  • [24] Improving Expanded Access in the United States: The Role of the Institutional Review Board
    Folkers, Kelly McBride
    Bateman-House, Alison
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (03) : 285 - 293
  • [25] Improving Expanded Access in the United States: The Role of the Institutional Review Board
    Kelly McBride Folkers
    Alison Bateman-House
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2018, 52 : 285 - 293
  • [26] Offshore Wind Farm Siting in Germany and the United States: Legal and Policy Impediments and Supports
    Portman, M. E.
    Koeppel, J.
    Duff, J. A.
    OCEANS 2009 - EUROPE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 1424 - +
  • [27] LiDAR Measurements of Wind Shear Exponents and Turbulence Intensity Offshore the Northeast United States
    Viselli, Anthony
    Faessler, Nathan
    Filippelli, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (04):
  • [28] Health and climate benefits of offshore wind facilities in the Mid-Atlantic United States
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    Luckow, Patrick
    Fisher, Jeremy
    Kempton, Willett
    Levy, Jonathan I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [29] Beyond the beach: Tradeoffs in tourism and recreation at the first offshore wind farm in the United States
    Smythe, Tiffany
    Bidwell, David
    Moore, Amelia
    Smith, Hollie
    McCann, Jennifer
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 70
  • [30] Europe, China and the United States: Three different approaches to the development of offshore wind energy
    Decastro, M.
    Salvador, S.
    Gomez-Gesteira, M.
    Costoya, X.
    Carvalho, D.
    Sanz-Larruga, F. J.
    Gimeno, L.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 109 : 55 - 70