A comparative assessment of proposed offshore wind power demonstration projects in the United States

被引:37
|
作者
Bates, Alison [1 ]
Firestone, Jeremy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Ctr Carbon free Power Integrat, 373 ISE Lab, Newark, DE 19711 USA
关键词
Offshore wind; Demonstration project; Public opinion; Social acceptance; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; SOCIAL GAP; ENERGY; FARMS; ACCEPTANCE; NIMBYISM; POLITICS; OUTCOMES; OPINION;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wind energy development on land has faced local opposition for reasons such as effects on cultural landscapes and wildlife, which can be instrumental in whether or not and the speed with which a project moves toward completion. Offshore wind can generate electricity where onshore wind is limited. Factors leading to support for, or opposition to, offshore wind energy are not well known, particularly for developments that are near-shore and in-view of coastal communities. Here we present results from a survey of 699 residents (35.5% response rate) completed in 2013 in greater Atlantic City, New Jersey and coastal Delaware, United States, where near-shore wind demonstration projects had been proposed. We examined how the public considers the societal tradeoffs that are made to develop small-scale, in-view demonstration wind projects instead of larger facilities farther offshore. Results indicate that a strong majority of the public supports near-shore demonstration wind projects. We find the primary reasons for support include benefits to wildlife, cost of electricity, and job creation, while the primary reasons for opposition include wildlife impacts, aesthetics, tourism, and user conflicts. These factors differ between the two communities and highlight the importance of local, community engagement in the early stages of development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 205
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OFFSHORE WIND PROJECTS AND FISHERIES Conflict and Engagement in the United Kingdom and the United States
    Haggett, Claire
    ten Brink, Talya
    Russell, Aaron
    Roach, Michael
    Firestone, Jeremy
    Dalton, Tracey
    McCay, Bonnie J.
    OCEANOGRAPHY, 2020, 33 (04) : 38 - 47
  • [2] The wind and the waves: Regulatory uncertainty and offshore wind power in the United States and United Kingdom
    Hartland, ND
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2003, 24 (03): : 691 - 728
  • [3] WIND-POWER PROJECTS ADVANCE IN THE UNITED-STATES
    JOHNSON, E
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 88 (11) : 35 - &
  • [4] European Offshore Power Grid Demonstration Projects
    Bialek, J. W.
    2012 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2012,
  • [5] A comparative analysis of business structures suitable for farmer-owned wind power projects in the United States
    Bolinger, M
    Wiser, R
    ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (14) : 1750 - 1761
  • [6] Opinion: The time has come for offshore wind power in the United States
    Firestone, Jeremy
    Archer, Cristina L.
    Gardner, Meryl P.
    Madsen, John A.
    Prasad, Ajay K.
    Veron, Dana E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (39) : 11985 - 11988
  • [7] Offshore wind power projects set sail
    Liu Chunsheng
    Electricity, 2010, 21 (02) : 8 - 8
  • [8] Status of offshore wind energy in the United States
    Manwell, JF
    Rogers, AL
    McGowan, JG
    2001 POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY SUMMER MEETING, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 10 - 13
  • [9] Offshore wind resource potential of the United States
    Heimiller, Donna
    Haymes, Steve
    Schwartz, Marc
    Musial, Walt
    2007 OCEANS, VOLS 1-5, 2007, : 675 - 682
  • [10] Public Acceptance of Offshore Wind Power Projects in the USA
    Firestone, Jeremy
    Kempton, Willett
    Krueger, Andrew
    WIND ENERGY, 2009, 12 (02) : 183 - 202