A comparative assessment of proposed offshore wind power demonstration projects in the United States

被引:37
|
作者
Bates, Alison [1 ]
Firestone, Jeremy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Ctr Carbon free Power Integrat, 373 ISE Lab, Newark, DE 19711 USA
关键词
Offshore wind; Demonstration project; Public opinion; Social acceptance; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; SOCIAL GAP; ENERGY; FARMS; ACCEPTANCE; NIMBYISM; POLITICS; OUTCOMES; OPINION;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wind energy development on land has faced local opposition for reasons such as effects on cultural landscapes and wildlife, which can be instrumental in whether or not and the speed with which a project moves toward completion. Offshore wind can generate electricity where onshore wind is limited. Factors leading to support for, or opposition to, offshore wind energy are not well known, particularly for developments that are near-shore and in-view of coastal communities. Here we present results from a survey of 699 residents (35.5% response rate) completed in 2013 in greater Atlantic City, New Jersey and coastal Delaware, United States, where near-shore wind demonstration projects had been proposed. We examined how the public considers the societal tradeoffs that are made to develop small-scale, in-view demonstration wind projects instead of larger facilities farther offshore. Results indicate that a strong majority of the public supports near-shore demonstration wind projects. We find the primary reasons for support include benefits to wildlife, cost of electricity, and job creation, while the primary reasons for opposition include wildlife impacts, aesthetics, tourism, and user conflicts. These factors differ between the two communities and highlight the importance of local, community engagement in the early stages of development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 205
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatial impacts of technological innovations on the levelized cost of energy for offshore wind power plants in the United States
    Shields, Matt
    Beiter, Philipp
    Kleiber, William
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 45
  • [32] Harnessing Offshore Wind in Canada: The Regulatory Landscape for Offshore Wind Development and Lessons Learned from the United Kingdom, Denmark, and the United States
    Robertson, Leah M.
    Dorreen, Matthew J.
    Raza, Mohammad Ali
    OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2023, 37 (01): : 276 - 310
  • [33] Effects of different wind data sources in offshore wind power assessment
    Soukissian, Takvor H.
    Papadopoulos, Anastasios
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 77 : 101 - 114
  • [34] Offshore wind power assessment on the western coast of Thailand
    Ranthodsang, Montree
    Waewsak, Jompob
    Kongruang, Chuleerat
    Gagnon, Yves
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 (1135-1146) : 1135 - 1146
  • [35] Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Risk Assessment and Management of Pile Foundation Engineering of Offshore Wind Power Projects
    Huang, Peipei
    Ou, Xiaolin
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY, ICCMT 2024, 2024, : 200 - 205
  • [36] Characterization of wind power resource in the United States
    Gunturu, U. B.
    Schlosser, C. A.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (20) : 9687 - 9702
  • [37] UNITED-STATES PROJECTS POWER, PARADOX IN GULF
    LUCKHAM, R
    BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 1990, 46 (10) : 10 - 11
  • [38] An assessment of the restructuring efforts and a proposed new model for the united States electric bulk power system
    Hein, JT
    Sen, PK
    2004 IEEE PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, VOLS 1 - 3, 2004, : 51 - 58
  • [39] WindNet: Improving the impact assessment of wind power projects
    Jones, Christopher R.
    Lange, Eckart
    Kang, Jian
    Tsuchiya, Aki
    Howell, Robert
    While, Aidan
    Crisp, Richard J.
    Steel, John
    Meade, Keelan
    Qu, Fei
    Sturge, Danial
    Bray, Agnes
    AIMS ENERGY, 2014, 2 (04) : 461 - 484
  • [40] Offshore wind electricity: A viable energy option for the coastal united states
    Musial, WaIt
    MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2007, 41 (03) : 32 - 43