The 'what' and 'how' of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review

被引:13
|
作者
Karran, Emma L. [1 ]
Cashin, Aidan G. [2 ,3 ]
Barker, Trevor [1 ]
Boyd, Mark A. [4 ,5 ]
Chiarotto, Alessandro [6 ]
Dewidar, Omar [7 ]
Petkovic, Jennifer [7 ]
Sharma, Saurab [2 ,3 ]
Tugwell, Peter [8 ,9 ]
Moseley, G. Lorimer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, IIMPACT Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Neurosci Res Australia, Ctr Pain IMPACT, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Northern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Erasmus Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Ottawa, Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
PEERJ | 2023年 / 11卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Social determinants of health; Social needs; Screening tools; Scoping review; Public health; Primary care; DETERMINANTS; RISK; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.15263
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and how these social needs are screened. Methods: We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf. io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories. Results: We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92-94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been 'validated'; 16 reported 'partial' validation; 12 reported that the tool was 'not validated' and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Childcare as a social determinant of access to healthcare: a scoping review
    Mcarthur, Megan
    Tian, Persephone
    Kho, Kimberly A.
    Bhavan, Kavita P.
    Balasubramanian, Bijal A.
    Ganguly, Anisha P.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [42] Examining How Social Risk Factors Are Integrated Into Clinical Settings Using Existing Data: A Scoping Review
    Ngongo, Wivine M.
    Peterson, Jonna
    Lipiszko, Dawid
    Gard, Lauren A.
    Wright, Katherine M.
    Parzuchowski, Aaron S.
    Ravenna, Paul A.
    Cooper, Andrew J.
    Persell, Stephen D.
    O'Brien, Matthew J.
    Goel, Mita Sanghavi
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2023, 21 : S68 - S74
  • [43] The experiences and needs of healthcare professionals facing perinatal death: A scoping review
    Shorey, Shefaly
    Andre, Beate
    Lopez, Violeta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 68 : 25 - 39
  • [44] Promoting disaster preparedness for children with special healthcare needs: A scoping review
    Newman, Maya
    Leochico, Carl Froilan D.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HEALTH, 2022, 8
  • [45] Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review
    Cene, Crystal W.
    Viswanathan, Meera
    Fichtenberg, Caroline M.
    Sathe, Nila A.
    Kennedy, Sara M.
    Gottlieb, Laura M.
    Cartier, Yuri
    Peek, Monica E.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (01) : E2250654
  • [46] Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Yan, Alice F.
    Chen, Zhuo
    Wang, Yang
    Campbell, Jennifer A.
    Xue, Qian-Li
    Williams, Michelle Y.
    Weinhardt, Lance S.
    Egede, Leonard E.
    HEALTH EQUITY, 2022, 6 (01) : 454 - 475
  • [47] What's the role of kindness in the healthcare context? A scoping review
    Greco, Angela
    Gonzalez-Ortiz, Laura G.
    Gabutti, Luca
    Lumera, Daniel
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [48] Who is at the centre of what? A scoping review of the conceptualisation of 'centredness' in healthcare
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth Ann
    Peart, Annette
    Richard, Lauralie
    Ball, Lauren
    Hunik, Liesbeth
    Chai, Tze Lin
    Lau, Steven
    Vadasz, Danny
    Russell, Grant
    Stewart, Moira
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [49] Screening for adverse childhood experiences in preventive medicine settings: a scoping review
    Mishra, Kratika
    Atkins, Daniel E.
    Gutierrez, Brenda
    Wu, Jinli
    Cousineau, Michael R.
    Hempel, Susanne
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2023, 31 (04): : 613 - 622
  • [50] Screening for adverse childhood experiences in antenatal care settings: A scoping review
    Tran, Nam
    Callaway, Leonie
    Shen, Sitong
    Biswas, Tuhin
    Scott, James G.
    Boyle, Fran
    Mamun, Abdullah
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 (05): : 626 - 634