The 'what' and 'how' of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review

被引:13
|
作者
Karran, Emma L. [1 ]
Cashin, Aidan G. [2 ,3 ]
Barker, Trevor [1 ]
Boyd, Mark A. [4 ,5 ]
Chiarotto, Alessandro [6 ]
Dewidar, Omar [7 ]
Petkovic, Jennifer [7 ]
Sharma, Saurab [2 ,3 ]
Tugwell, Peter [8 ,9 ]
Moseley, G. Lorimer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, IIMPACT Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Neurosci Res Australia, Ctr Pain IMPACT, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Northern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Erasmus Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Ottawa, Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
PEERJ | 2023年 / 11卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Social determinants of health; Social needs; Screening tools; Scoping review; Public health; Primary care; DETERMINANTS; RISK; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.15263
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and how these social needs are screened. Methods: We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf. io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories. Results: We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92-94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been 'validated'; 16 reported 'partial' validation; 12 reported that the tool was 'not validated' and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A scoping review of 'think-family' approaches in healthcare settings
    Woodman, Jenny
    Simon, Antonia
    Hauari, Hanan
    Gilbert, Ruth
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 42 (01) : 21 - 37
  • [22] A Scoping Review of Validated Tools to Measure Incivility in Healthcare Settings
    Harris, Whitney C.
    Usseglio, John
    Chapman-Rodriguez, Rose
    Licursi, Maureen
    Larson, Elaine
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 49 (09): : 447 - 453
  • [23] Nudging healthcare professionals in clinical settings: a scoping review of the literature
    Anita Sant’Anna
    Andreas Vilhelmsson
    Axel Wolf
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [24] Interventions to improve primary healthcare in rural settings: A scoping review
    Aubrey-Basler, Kris
    Bursey, Krystal
    Pike, Andrea
    Penney, Carla
    Furlong, Bradley
    Howells, Mark
    Al-Obaid, Harith
    Rourke, James
    Asghari, Shabnam
    Hall, Amanda
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [25] Barriers to smoking interventions in community healthcare settings: a scoping review
    Coleman, Cheryn
    Ferguson, Stuart G.
    Nash, Rosie
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 39 (02)
  • [26] Social determinants of health screening in pediatric healthcare settings
    Nerlinger, Abby L.
    Kopsombut, Gift
    CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 35 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [27] Stakeholder perspectives on social screening in US healthcare settings
    Benjamín Aceves
    Emilia De Marchis
    Vishalli Loomba
    Erika M. Brown
    Laura M. Gottlieb
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [28] The application of social innovation in healthcare: a scoping review
    Lindi van Niekerk
    Lenore Manderson
    Dina Balabanova
    Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 10
  • [29] Assessing Implementation of Social Screening Within US Health Care Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review
    De Marchis, Emilia H.
    Aceves, Benjamin A.
    Brown, Erika M.
    Loomba, Vishalli
    Molina, Melanie F.
    Gottlieb, Laura M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (04) : 626 - 649
  • [30] The application of social innovation in healthcare: a scoping review
    van Niekerk, Lindi
    Manderson, Lenore
    Balabanova, Dina
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF POVERTY, 2021, 10 (01)