The 'what' and 'how' of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review

被引:13
|
作者
Karran, Emma L. [1 ]
Cashin, Aidan G. [2 ,3 ]
Barker, Trevor [1 ]
Boyd, Mark A. [4 ,5 ]
Chiarotto, Alessandro [6 ]
Dewidar, Omar [7 ]
Petkovic, Jennifer [7 ]
Sharma, Saurab [2 ,3 ]
Tugwell, Peter [8 ,9 ]
Moseley, G. Lorimer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, IIMPACT Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Neurosci Res Australia, Ctr Pain IMPACT, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Northern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Erasmus Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Ottawa, Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
PEERJ | 2023年 / 11卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Social determinants of health; Social needs; Screening tools; Scoping review; Public health; Primary care; DETERMINANTS; RISK; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.15263
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and how these social needs are screened. Methods: We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf. io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories. Results: We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92-94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been 'validated'; 16 reported 'partial' validation; 12 reported that the tool was 'not validated' and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The 'what' and 'how' of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
    Karran, Emma L.
    Cashin, Aidan G.
    Barker, Trevor
    Boyd, Mark A.
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Dewidar, Omar
    Petkovic, Jennifer
    Sharma, Saurab
    Tugwell, Peter
    Moseley, G. Lorimer
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [2] Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review
    O'Donnell, Patrick
    O'Donovan, Diarmuid
    Elmusharaf, Khalifa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2018, 17
  • [3] Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review
    Patrick O’Donnell
    Diarmuid O’Donovan
    Khalifa Elmusharaf
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 17
  • [4] Social Network Analysis in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Chambers, Duncan
    Wilson, Paul
    Thompson, Carl
    Harden, Melissa
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [5] How is suicide risk assessed in healthcare settings in the UK? A systematic scoping review
    Fedorowicz, Sophia E.
    Dempsey, Robert C.
    Ellis, Naomi
    Phillips, Elliott
    Gidlow, Christopher
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [6] Racial Microaggressions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review
    Khan, Nagina
    Hafeez, Danish
    Goolamallee, Tayyib
    Arora, Ananya
    Smith, Will
    Shankar, Rohit
    Dave, Subodh
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2023, 9 : S7 - S8
  • [7] Racial Microaggressions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review
    Khan, Nagina
    Hafeez, Danish
    Goolamallee, Tayyib
    Arora, Ananya
    Smith, Will
    Shankar, Rohit
    Dave, Subodh
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2023, 9 : S7 - S8
  • [8] Social workers coordination in primary healthcare for patients with complex needs: A scoping review
    Couturier, Yves
    Lanoue, Severine
    Karam, Marlene
    Guillette, Maxime
    Hudon, Catherine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION, 2023, 26 (01) : 5 - 25
  • [9] Boredom in inpatient mental healthcare settings: a scoping review
    Marshall, Carrie Anne
    McIntosh, Emma
    Sohrabi, Almas
    Amir, Adam
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 83 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [10] Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review
    Debono, Deborah S.
    Greenfield, David
    Travaglia, Joanne F.
    Long, Janet C.
    Black, Deborah
    Johnson, Julie
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13