RIRS with disposable or reusable scopes: does it make a difference? Results from the multicenter FLEXOR study

被引:5
|
作者
Gauhar, Vineet [2 ]
Chai, Chu Ann [3 ]
Chew, Ben H. [4 ]
Singh, Abhishek [5 ]
Castellani, Daniele [6 ]
Tailly, Thomas [7 ]
Emiliani, Esteban [8 ]
Keat, William Ong Lay [9 ]
Ragoori, Deepak [10 ]
Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine [11 ]
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun [12 ]
Traxer, Olivier [13 ]
Somani, Bhaskar Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Southampton SO16 6YD, England
[2] Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Malaya, Dept Surg, Urol Unit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Muljibhai Patel Urol Hosp, Nadiad, India
[6] Univ Politecn Marche, Urol Unit, Azienda Osped Univ Marche, Ancona, Italy
[7] Univ Hosp Ghent, Dept Urol, Ghent, Belgium
[8] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Puigvert, Urol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Penang Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, George Town, Malaysia
[10] Asian Inst Nephrourol, Hyderabad, India
[11] Univ Hosp Mohammed VIth Marrakesh, Dept Urol, Marrakech, Morocco
[12] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, SH Ho Urol Ctr, Dept Surg,Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[13] Sorbonne Univ, Tenon Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, Paris, France
关键词
disposable; kidney calculi; laser; RIRS; ureteroscopy; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPES; GUIDELINE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/17562872231158072
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction:With several single-use ureteroscopes now available, our aim was to analyze and compare data obtained globally from high-volume centers using both disposable and reusable flexible ureteroscopes and see if indeed in real-world practice either scope has a distinct advantage. Methods:Retrospective analysis was performed on the FLEXOR registry, which was created as a TOWER group (Team of Worldwide Endourological Researchers, research wing of the Endourological Society) endeavor. Patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones from January 2018 to August 2021 were enrolled from 20 centers globally. A total of 6663 patients whose data were available for analysis were divided into Group 1 (Reusable scopes, 4808 patients) versus Group 2 (Disposable scopes, 1855 patients). Results:The age and gender distribution were similar in both groups. The mean stone size was 11.8 mm and 9.6 mm in Groups 2 and 1, respectively (p < 0.001). Group 2 had more patients with >2 cm stones, lower pole stones and of higher Hounsfield unit. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) was used more in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Patients in Group 2 had a slightly higher stone-free rate (SFR) (78.22%) and a lower number of residual fragments (RFs) compared with Group 1 (p < 0.001). The need for further treatments for RF and overall complications was comparable between groups. On multivariate analysis, overall complications were more likely to occur in elderly patients, larger stone size, lower pole stones, and were also more when using disposable scopes with longer operative time. RFs were significantly higher (p < 0.001) for lower pole, larger, harder, multiple stones and in elderly. Conclusion:Our real-world practice observations suggest that urologists choose disposable scopes for bigger, lower pole, and harder stones, and it does indeed help in improving the single-stage SFR if used correctly, with the appropriate lasers and lasing techniques in expert hands.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can Early Assessment Make a Difference in Child Protection? Results from a Pilot Study
    Faller, Kathleen Coulborn
    Ortega, Mary B.
    Pomeranz, Elaine
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC CHILD WELFARE, 2008, 2 (01) : 71 - 90
  • [32] Do carers' needs assessments make a difference? Results from the Forget Me Not study
    Orrell, Martin
    Cooper, Claudia
    Braithwaite, Sally
    AGE AND AGEING, 2006, 35 (04) : 444 - 445
  • [33] THE REUSED-DISPOSABLE FLEXIBLE SCOPES IN RETROGRADE INTRA-RENAL SURGERY FOR STONES: PRELIMINARY OUTCOMES FROM A MULTICENTER STUDY OF 2183 PATIENTS BY THE TOWER GROUP
    Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine
    Traxer, Olivier
    Sabnis, Ravindra
    Gujarat, Nadiad
    Fong, Khi Yung
    Gharia, Parimal Sinh
    Ragoori, Deepak
    Lim, Ee Jean
    Tanidir, Yiloren
    Mehta, Amish
    Gokcej, Mehmet Ilker
    Soebhali, Boyke
    Gadzhiev, Nariman
    Chew, Ben H.
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Castellani, Daniele
    Gauhar, Vineet
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E188 - E188
  • [34] Does Language Make a Difference? A Study of Language Dominance and Inhibitory Control
    Salwei, Ashley Marie
    de Diego-Lazaro, Beatriz
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [35] DOES PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS MAKE A DIFFERENCE - A STUDY OF SECOND TRIALS
    ROPER, RT
    MELONE, AP
    JUDICATURE, 1981, 65 (03) : 136 - 142
  • [36] DOES SEX MAKE A DIFFERENCE - CASE-STUDY OF WOMEN IN POLITICS
    MEZEY, SG
    WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1978, 31 (04): : 492 - 501
  • [37] Does family motivation make a difference for management educators? An empirical study
    Pahi, Munwar Hussain
    Umrani, Waheed Ali
    Siyal, Abdul Waheed
    Ahmed, Umair
    Al Riyami, Said
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [38] Does process flow make a difference to mortality and cost? An observational study
    Silvester, Kate
    Harriman, Paul
    Walley, Paul
    Burley, Glen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2014, 27 (07) : 616 - +
  • [39] What difference does it make to be treated in a clinical trial? A pilot study
    Weijer, C
    Freedman, B
    Fuks, A
    Robbins, J
    Shapiro, S
    Skrutkowska, M
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1996, 19 (03): : 179 - 183
  • [40] Recruiter Evaluation of Candidates for Employment: Does Study Abroad Make a Difference?
    Turos, Jessica M.
    Strange, C. Carney
    JOURNAL OF EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING, 2018, 55 (03) : 96 - 103