RIRS with disposable or reusable scopes: does it make a difference? Results from the multicenter FLEXOR study

被引:5
|
作者
Gauhar, Vineet [2 ]
Chai, Chu Ann [3 ]
Chew, Ben H. [4 ]
Singh, Abhishek [5 ]
Castellani, Daniele [6 ]
Tailly, Thomas [7 ]
Emiliani, Esteban [8 ]
Keat, William Ong Lay [9 ]
Ragoori, Deepak [10 ]
Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine [11 ]
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun [12 ]
Traxer, Olivier [13 ]
Somani, Bhaskar Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Southampton SO16 6YD, England
[2] Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Malaya, Dept Surg, Urol Unit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Muljibhai Patel Urol Hosp, Nadiad, India
[6] Univ Politecn Marche, Urol Unit, Azienda Osped Univ Marche, Ancona, Italy
[7] Univ Hosp Ghent, Dept Urol, Ghent, Belgium
[8] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Puigvert, Urol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Penang Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, George Town, Malaysia
[10] Asian Inst Nephrourol, Hyderabad, India
[11] Univ Hosp Mohammed VIth Marrakesh, Dept Urol, Marrakech, Morocco
[12] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, SH Ho Urol Ctr, Dept Surg,Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[13] Sorbonne Univ, Tenon Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, Paris, France
关键词
disposable; kidney calculi; laser; RIRS; ureteroscopy; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPES; GUIDELINE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/17562872231158072
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction:With several single-use ureteroscopes now available, our aim was to analyze and compare data obtained globally from high-volume centers using both disposable and reusable flexible ureteroscopes and see if indeed in real-world practice either scope has a distinct advantage. Methods:Retrospective analysis was performed on the FLEXOR registry, which was created as a TOWER group (Team of Worldwide Endourological Researchers, research wing of the Endourological Society) endeavor. Patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones from January 2018 to August 2021 were enrolled from 20 centers globally. A total of 6663 patients whose data were available for analysis were divided into Group 1 (Reusable scopes, 4808 patients) versus Group 2 (Disposable scopes, 1855 patients). Results:The age and gender distribution were similar in both groups. The mean stone size was 11.8 mm and 9.6 mm in Groups 2 and 1, respectively (p < 0.001). Group 2 had more patients with >2 cm stones, lower pole stones and of higher Hounsfield unit. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) was used more in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Patients in Group 2 had a slightly higher stone-free rate (SFR) (78.22%) and a lower number of residual fragments (RFs) compared with Group 1 (p < 0.001). The need for further treatments for RF and overall complications was comparable between groups. On multivariate analysis, overall complications were more likely to occur in elderly patients, larger stone size, lower pole stones, and were also more when using disposable scopes with longer operative time. RFs were significantly higher (p < 0.001) for lower pole, larger, harder, multiple stones and in elderly. Conclusion:Our real-world practice observations suggest that urologists choose disposable scopes for bigger, lower pole, and harder stones, and it does indeed help in improving the single-stage SFR if used correctly, with the appropriate lasers and lasing techniques in expert hands.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Successful vaginal delivery after external cephalic version (ECV): does time interval from ECV to delivery make a difference? A multicenter study
    Tal Cahan
    Gabriel Levin
    Orit Moran
    Yishay Weill
    Raphael Pollack
    Raanan Meyer
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 302 : 1361 - 1367
  • [22] Does gender influence retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) outcomes? Data from the Flexible Ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR)
    Emiliani, E.
    Sanz-Gomez, I.
    Somani, B.
    Tailly, T.
    Castellani, D.
    Traxer, O.
    Teoh, J. Yuen-Chun
    Chew, B. Hall
    Keat, W. Ong Lay
    Chai, C. A.
    Saeed, B. Hamri
    Shrestha, A.
    Soehabali, B.
    Angerri, O.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2023, 47 (09): : 581 - 587
  • [23] Apoplectic leiomyomas: does ethnicity make a difference? a clinicopathologic study
    Bradley M. Turner
    Stewart F. Cramer
    Debra S. Heller
    Fattaneh A. Tavassoli
    Virchows Archiv, 2022, 480 : 645 - 654
  • [24] Apoplectic leiomyomas: does ethnicity make a difference? a clinicopathologic study
    Turner, Bradley M.
    Cramer, Stewart F.
    Heller, Debra S.
    Tavassoli, Fattaneh A.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2022, 480 (03) : 645 - 654
  • [25] What difference does feminism make to the study of German literature?
    WatanabeOKelly, H
    GERMAN LIFE AND LETTERS, 1997, 50 (04) : 380 - 389
  • [26] REPORTING OPERATIVE HEARING RESULTS - DOES CHOICE OF OUTCOME MEASURE MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    GOLDENBERG, RA
    BERLINER, KI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1995, 16 (02): : 128 - 135
  • [27] Does Risk Assessment Make a Difference? Results of Implementing the SAVRY in Juvenile Probation
    Vincent, Gina M.
    Guy, Laura S.
    Gershenson, Bernice G.
    McCabe, Patrick
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2012, 30 (04) : 384 - 405
  • [28] Does technology make a difference? Evidence from Spanish hotels
    Ruiz-Molina, Maria-Eugenia
    Gil-Saura, Irene
    Moliner-Velazquez, Beatriz
    SERVICE BUSINESS, 2011, 5 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [29] Exploration or exploitation of knowledge from universities: does it make a difference?
    Arvanitis, S.
    Woerter, M.
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 24 (06) : 596 - 623
  • [30] Does technology make a difference? Evidence from Spanish hotels
    Maria-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina
    Irene Gil-Saura
    Beatriz Moliner-Velázquez
    Service Business, 2011, 5 : 1 - 12