Interpretable machine learning model to predict surgical difficulty in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Miao [1 ]
Yuan, Zihan [1 ]
Li, Ruijie [1 ]
Shi, Bo [1 ]
Wan, Daiwei [1 ]
Dong, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
rectal cancer; pelvimetry; surgical difficulty; prediction model; machine learning; Shapley additive explanations; 3-DIMENSIONAL PELVIMETRY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ADVERSE OUTCOMES; SURGERY; IMPACT; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; OBESITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1337219
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) is standard surgical methods for rectal cancer, and LaTME operation is a challenging procedure. This study is intended to use machine learning to develop and validate prediction models for surgical difficulty of LaTME in patients with rectal cancer and compare these models' performance.Methods We retrospectively collected the preoperative clinical and MRI pelvimetry parameter of rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal resection from 2017 to 2022. The difficulty of LaTME was defined according to the scoring criteria reported by Escal. Patients were randomly divided into training group (80%) and test group (20%). We selected independent influencing features using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression method. Adopt synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to alleviate the class imbalance problem. Six machine learning model were developed: light gradient boosting machine (LGBM); categorical boosting (CatBoost); extreme gradient boost (XGBoost), logistic regression (LR); random forests (RF); multilayer perceptron (MLP). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1 score were used to evaluate the performance of the model. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis provided interpretation for the best machine learning model. Further decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical manifestations of the model.Results A total of 626 patients were included. LASSO regression analysis shows that tumor height, prognostic nutrition index (PNI), pelvic inlet, pelvic outlet, sacrococcygeal distance, mesorectal fat area and angle 5 (the angle between the apex of the sacral angle and the lower edge of the pubic bone) are the predictor variables of the machine learning model. In addition, the correlation heatmap shows that there is no significant correlation between these seven variables. When predicting the difficulty of LaTME surgery, the XGBoost model performed best among the six machine learning models (AUROC=0.855). Based on the decision curve analysis (DCA) results, the XGBoost model is also superior, and feature importance analysis shows that tumor height is the most important variable among the seven factors.Conclusions This study developed an XGBoost model to predict the difficulty of LaTME surgery. This model can help clinicians quickly and accurately predict the difficulty of surgery and adopt individualized surgical methods.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A nomogram predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Ye, Chengwei
    Wang, Xiaojie
    Sun, Yanwu
    Deng, Yu
    Huang, Ying
    Chi, Pan
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (11) : 1835 - 1842
  • [42] A nomogram predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Chengwei Ye
    Xiaojie Wang
    Yanwu Sun
    Yu Deng
    Ying Huang
    Pan Chi
    Surgery Today, 2021, 51 : 1835 - 1842
  • [43] BMI and pelvimetry help to predict the duration of laparoscopic resection for low and middle rectal cancer
    Wenhao Teng
    Jingfu Liu
    Meimei Chen
    Weidong Zang
    Aiwen Wu
    BMC Surgery, 22
  • [44] BMI and pelvimetry help to predict the duration of laparoscopic resection for low and middle rectal cancer
    Teng, Wenhao
    Liu, Jingfu
    Chen, Meimei
    Zang, Weidong
    Wu, Aiwen
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [45] Prediction model for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
    Shiwakoti, Enesh
    Song, Jianning
    Li, Jun
    Wu, Shanshan
    Zhang, Zhongtao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (09)
  • [46] Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal malignancy
    Sekine, Yuki
    Sugo, Hiroyuki
    Ichikawa, Ryousuke
    Miyano, Shozo
    Watanobe, Ikuo
    Machida, Michio
    Kitabatake, Toshiaki
    Kojima, Kuniaki
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 559 - 559
  • [47] The learning curve of laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: A single-center experience
    Montorsi, Marco
    Rottoli, Matteo
    Bona, Stefano
    Bianchi, Paolo P.
    Rosati, Riccardo
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A859 - A859
  • [48] CT-DETERMINED AREA OF THE PELVIS OCCUPIED BY AN UPPER RECTAL TUMOR AS A PREDICTOR OF SURGICAL DIFFICULTY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC RECTAL RESECTION.
    Tsukamoto, Y.
    Makizumi, R.
    Ogura, Y.
    Otsubo, T.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E342 - E342
  • [49] Prognostic model for log odds of negative lymph node in locally advanced rectal cancer via interpretable machine learning
    Wang, Ye
    Pan, Zhen
    Cai, Huajun
    Li, Shoufeng
    Huang, Ying
    Zhuang, Jinfu
    Liu, Xing
    Guan, Guoxian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [50] Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
    Kumar, Naveena A. N.
    Palod, Akhil
    Ahmed, Sameer
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2024, 67 (03) : E201 - E201