Interpretable machine learning model to predict surgical difficulty in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Miao [1 ]
Yuan, Zihan [1 ]
Li, Ruijie [1 ]
Shi, Bo [1 ]
Wan, Daiwei [1 ]
Dong, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
rectal cancer; pelvimetry; surgical difficulty; prediction model; machine learning; Shapley additive explanations; 3-DIMENSIONAL PELVIMETRY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ADVERSE OUTCOMES; SURGERY; IMPACT; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; OBESITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1337219
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) is standard surgical methods for rectal cancer, and LaTME operation is a challenging procedure. This study is intended to use machine learning to develop and validate prediction models for surgical difficulty of LaTME in patients with rectal cancer and compare these models' performance.Methods We retrospectively collected the preoperative clinical and MRI pelvimetry parameter of rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal resection from 2017 to 2022. The difficulty of LaTME was defined according to the scoring criteria reported by Escal. Patients were randomly divided into training group (80%) and test group (20%). We selected independent influencing features using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression method. Adopt synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to alleviate the class imbalance problem. Six machine learning model were developed: light gradient boosting machine (LGBM); categorical boosting (CatBoost); extreme gradient boost (XGBoost), logistic regression (LR); random forests (RF); multilayer perceptron (MLP). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1 score were used to evaluate the performance of the model. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis provided interpretation for the best machine learning model. Further decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical manifestations of the model.Results A total of 626 patients were included. LASSO regression analysis shows that tumor height, prognostic nutrition index (PNI), pelvic inlet, pelvic outlet, sacrococcygeal distance, mesorectal fat area and angle 5 (the angle between the apex of the sacral angle and the lower edge of the pubic bone) are the predictor variables of the machine learning model. In addition, the correlation heatmap shows that there is no significant correlation between these seven variables. When predicting the difficulty of LaTME surgery, the XGBoost model performed best among the six machine learning models (AUROC=0.855). Based on the decision curve analysis (DCA) results, the XGBoost model is also superior, and feature importance analysis shows that tumor height is the most important variable among the seven factors.Conclusions This study developed an XGBoost model to predict the difficulty of LaTME surgery. This model can help clinicians quickly and accurately predict the difficulty of surgery and adopt individualized surgical methods.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Review
    Poon, Jensen T. C.
    Law, Wai Lun
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (11) : 3038 - 3047
  • [32] Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Kayano, Hajime
    Okuda, Junji
    Tanaka, Keitaro
    Kondo, Keisaku
    Tanigawa, Nobuhiko
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (09): : 2972 - 2979
  • [33] An Update on Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Row, David
    Weiser, Martin R.
    CANCER CONTROL, 2010, 17 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [34] Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Hajime Kayano
    Junji Okuda
    Keitaro Tanaka
    Keisaku Kondo
    Nobuhiko Tanigawa
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 2972 - 2979
  • [35] Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Review
    Jensen T. C. Poon
    Wai Lun Law
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16 : 3038 - 3047
  • [36] Skeletal Muscle Mass and Surgical Morbidity After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Resection
    Portale, Giuseppe
    Spolverato, Ylenia Camilla
    Bartolotta, Patrizia
    Gregori, Dario
    Mazzeo, Antonio
    Rettore, Carlo
    Cancian, Luca
    Fiscon, Valentino
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (06): : 570 - 578
  • [37] A BENEFIT RISK ASSESSMENT OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RECTAL SURGICAL RESECTION FOR CANCER
    Huh, J. W.
    Yoo, A.
    Chow, W.
    Levitan, B.
    Won, S. H.
    Kim, N. E.
    Oh, B. Y.
    Park, H.
    Lee, W. Y.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S60 - S60
  • [38] Using Machine Learning to Predict Chat Difficulty
    Walker, Jeremy
    Coleman, Jason
    COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2021, 82 (05): : 683 - 707
  • [39] Optimized machine learning model for predicting unplanned reoperation after rectal cancer anterior resection
    Su, Yang
    Li, Yanqi
    Yang, Wangshuo
    Luo, Xuelai
    Chen, Lisheng
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (12):
  • [40] Laparoscopic rectal resection versus open rectal resection with minilaparotomy for invasive rectal cancer
    Zhou, Tong
    Zhang, Guangjun
    Tian, Hongpeng
    Liu, Zuoliang
    Xia, Shusen
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 5 (01) : 36 - 45