Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Gu, Li [2 ]
Li, Yijian [1 ]
Li, Xurui [1 ]
Liu, Wentao [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; Transurethral resection of the prostate; Quality of life; Prognosis; Safety; HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION; OUTCOMES; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; HISTORY; TURP;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01588-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
It is not uncommon to incidentally discover prostate cancer during the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and necessitate a subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study aims to evaluate whether TURP have negative influence on subsequent RARP. Through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, 10 studies with 683 patients who underwent RARP after previous TURP and 4039 patients who underwent RARP only were identified for the purposes of the meta-analysis. Compared to standard RARP, RARP after TURP was related to longer operative time (WMD: 29.1 min, 95% CI: 13.3-44.8, P < 0.001), more blood loss (WMD: 49.3 ml, 95% CI: 8.8-89.7, P = 0.02), longer time to catheter removal (WMD: 0.93 days, 95% CI: 0.41-1.44, P < 0.001), higher rates of overall (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.95, P = 0.01) and major complications (RR: 3.67, 95% Cl: 1.63-8.24, P = 0.002), frequently demand for bladder neck reconstruction (RR: 5.46, 95% CI: 3.15-9.47, P < 0.001) and lower succeed in nerve sparing (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87, P < 0.001). In terms of quality of life, there are worse recovery of urinary continence (RR of incontinence rate: RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03) and potency (RR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.73-0.89, P < 0.001) at 1 year in RARP with previous TURP. In addition, the RARP with previous TURP had greater percentage positive margins (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03), while there is no difference in length of stay and biochemical recurrence rate at 1 year. RARP is feasible but challenging after TURP. It significantly increases the difficulty of operation and compromises surgical, functional and oncological outcomes. It is important for urologists and patients to be aware of the negative impact of TURP on subsequent RARP and establish treatment strategies to lessen the adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does partnership status affect the quality of life of men having robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localised prostate cancer?
    Howard, Nicholas
    Dowrick, Adam S.
    Wootten, Addie
    Howard, Nicholas
    Botti, Mari
    Costello, Anthony J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 53 - 54
  • [42] Does partnership status affect the quality of life of men having robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localised prostate cancer?
    Dowrick, Adam S.
    Wootten, Addie C.
    Botti, Mari
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2018, 42 : 51 - 55
  • [43] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high risk localised prostate cancer
    Ho, Franklin K. L.
    Yip, Sidney K. H.
    Ng, C. F.
    Lam, N. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A168 - A168
  • [44] High risk localised prostate cancer treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Challacombe, B.
    Murphy, D.
    Hong, M.
    Hovens, C.
    Kerger, M.
    Moon, D.
    Peters, J.
    Costello, A. J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 : 24 - 24
  • [45] Advancements in artificial intelligence for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men suffering from prostate cancer: results from a scoping review
    Castellani, Daniele
    Perpepaj, Leonard
    Fuligni, Demetra
    Chiacchio, Giuseppe
    Tramanzoli, Pietro
    Stramucci, Silvia
    De Stefano, Virgilio
    Cammarata, Vanessa
    Cappucelli, Simone
    Pasarella, Valerio
    Ferretti, Stefania
    Campobasso, Davide
    Gauhar, Vineet
    Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13 (04)
  • [46] Letter to the Editor regarding the article “Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: oncological, surgical and functional outcomes—a meta-analysis”
    Peihua Liu
    Yangle Li
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 3305 - 3305
  • [47] Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Huang, Jing
    Zhang, Peiyan
    Zhang, Lifen
    Lin, Wang
    Wang, Chunhua
    Lin, Dahe
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 230 - 230
  • [48] Thulium laser VapoResection of the prostate versus traditional transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deng, Zheng
    Sun, Menghao
    Zhu, Yiping
    Zhuo, Jian
    Zhao, Fujun
    Xia, Shujie
    Han, Bangmin
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1355 - 1364
  • [49] Statins and prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Park, H. S.
    Schoenfeld, J. D.
    Mailhot, R. B.
    Shive, M.
    Hartman, R. I.
    Ogembo, R.
    Mucci, L. A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (06) : 1427 - 1434
  • [50] Thulium laser VapoResection of the prostate versus traditional transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng Deng
    Menghao Sun
    Yiping Zhu
    Jian Zhuo
    Fujun Zhao
    Shujie Xia
    Bangmin Han
    Thomas R. W. Herrmann
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 1355 - 1364