Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Gu, Li [2 ]
Li, Yijian [1 ]
Li, Xurui [1 ]
Liu, Wentao [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; Transurethral resection of the prostate; Quality of life; Prognosis; Safety; HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION; OUTCOMES; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; HISTORY; TURP;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01588-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
It is not uncommon to incidentally discover prostate cancer during the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and necessitate a subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study aims to evaluate whether TURP have negative influence on subsequent RARP. Through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, 10 studies with 683 patients who underwent RARP after previous TURP and 4039 patients who underwent RARP only were identified for the purposes of the meta-analysis. Compared to standard RARP, RARP after TURP was related to longer operative time (WMD: 29.1 min, 95% CI: 13.3-44.8, P < 0.001), more blood loss (WMD: 49.3 ml, 95% CI: 8.8-89.7, P = 0.02), longer time to catheter removal (WMD: 0.93 days, 95% CI: 0.41-1.44, P < 0.001), higher rates of overall (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.95, P = 0.01) and major complications (RR: 3.67, 95% Cl: 1.63-8.24, P = 0.002), frequently demand for bladder neck reconstruction (RR: 5.46, 95% CI: 3.15-9.47, P < 0.001) and lower succeed in nerve sparing (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87, P < 0.001). In terms of quality of life, there are worse recovery of urinary continence (RR of incontinence rate: RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03) and potency (RR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.73-0.89, P < 0.001) at 1 year in RARP with previous TURP. In addition, the RARP with previous TURP had greater percentage positive margins (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03), while there is no difference in length of stay and biochemical recurrence rate at 1 year. RARP is feasible but challenging after TURP. It significantly increases the difficulty of operation and compromises surgical, functional and oncological outcomes. It is important for urologists and patients to be aware of the negative impact of TURP on subsequent RARP and establish treatment strategies to lessen the adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    O'Connor-Cordova, Mario A.
    Macias, Alan Gabriel Ortega
    Sancen-Herrera, Juan Pablo
    Altamirano-Lamarque, Francisco
    Vargas del Toro, Alexis
    Peddinani, Bharat Kumar
    Canal-Zarate, Pia
    O'Connor-Juarez, Mario A.
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (15): : 1395 - 1414
  • [22] Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Thangasamy, I.
    Chalasani, V.
    Bachmann, A.
    Woo, H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 48 - 48
  • [23] PHOTOSELECTIVE VAPORIZATION OF THE PROSTATE VERSUS TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
    Thangasamy, Isaac
    Chalasani, Venu
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Woo, Henry
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E818 - E818
  • [24] Impact of previous transurethral resection of prostate on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a matched cohort analysis
    Garg, Harshit
    Seth, Amlesh
    Kumar, Rajeev
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (05) : 1123 - 1131
  • [25] Impact of previous transurethral resection of prostate on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a matched cohort analysis
    Harshit Garg
    Amlesh Seth
    Rajeev Kumar
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1123 - 1131
  • [26] Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Samer L. Traboulsi
    David-Dan Nguyen
    Ahmed S. Zakaria
    Kyle W. Law
    Hanna Shahine
    Malek Meskawi
    Cristina Negrean
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    Assaad El Hakim
    Kevin C. Zorn
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 2791 - 2798
  • [27] Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Traboulsi, Samer L.
    Nguyen, David-Dan
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Law, Kyle W.
    Shahine, Hanna
    Meskawi, Malek
    Negrean, Cristina
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    El Hakim, Assaad
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (11) : 2791 - 2798
  • [28] Systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer
    Song, Chao
    Cheng, Lucia
    Li, Yanli
    Kreaden, Usha
    Snyder, Susan R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [29] Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
    Sandoval Salinas, Carolina
    Gonzalez Rangel, Andres L.
    Catano Catano, Juan G.
    Fuentes Pachon, Juan C.
    Castillo Londono, Juan S.
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2013, 2013
  • [30] Surgical and functional outcomes of robot assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with previous transurethral resection of the prostate
    Chen, Sih Han
    Lin, Victor C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 49 - 49