Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Gu, Li [2 ]
Li, Yijian [1 ]
Li, Xurui [1 ]
Liu, Wentao [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; Transurethral resection of the prostate; Quality of life; Prognosis; Safety; HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION; OUTCOMES; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; HISTORY; TURP;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01588-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
It is not uncommon to incidentally discover prostate cancer during the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and necessitate a subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study aims to evaluate whether TURP have negative influence on subsequent RARP. Through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, 10 studies with 683 patients who underwent RARP after previous TURP and 4039 patients who underwent RARP only were identified for the purposes of the meta-analysis. Compared to standard RARP, RARP after TURP was related to longer operative time (WMD: 29.1 min, 95% CI: 13.3-44.8, P < 0.001), more blood loss (WMD: 49.3 ml, 95% CI: 8.8-89.7, P = 0.02), longer time to catheter removal (WMD: 0.93 days, 95% CI: 0.41-1.44, P < 0.001), higher rates of overall (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.95, P = 0.01) and major complications (RR: 3.67, 95% Cl: 1.63-8.24, P = 0.002), frequently demand for bladder neck reconstruction (RR: 5.46, 95% CI: 3.15-9.47, P < 0.001) and lower succeed in nerve sparing (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87, P < 0.001). In terms of quality of life, there are worse recovery of urinary continence (RR of incontinence rate: RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03) and potency (RR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.73-0.89, P < 0.001) at 1 year in RARP with previous TURP. In addition, the RARP with previous TURP had greater percentage positive margins (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03), while there is no difference in length of stay and biochemical recurrence rate at 1 year. RARP is feasible but challenging after TURP. It significantly increases the difficulty of operation and compromises surgical, functional and oncological outcomes. It is important for urologists and patients to be aware of the negative impact of TURP on subsequent RARP and establish treatment strategies to lessen the adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li Gu
    Yijian Li
    Xurui Li
    Wentao Liu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 1299 - 1307
  • [2] Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Huihuang
    Zhao, Cheng
    Liu, Peihua
    Hu, Jiao
    Yi, Zhenglin
    Chen, Jinbo
    Zu, Xiongbing
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2019, 8 (06) : 712 - +
  • [3] DOES PREVIOUS TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE AFFECT THE OUTCOMES IN ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY?
    Jaber, Abdel Rahman S.
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Saikali, Shady
    Gamal, Ahmed
    Perera, Roshane
    Rogers, Travis
    Sandri, Marco
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E607 - E607
  • [4] Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate affect the outcomes in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Jaber, Abdel Rahman
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Noel, Jonathan
    Stirt, Daniel
    Rogers, Travis
    Saikali, Shady
    Gamal, Ahmed
    Sandri, Marco
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Patel, Vipul
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [5] Robotic or Open Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Previous Transurethral Resection of Prostate
    Mustafa, Mahmoud
    Davis, John W.
    Gorgel, Sacit Nuri
    Pisters, Louis
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (01) : 2955 - 2960
  • [6] Surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with previous transurethral resection of the prostate
    Chen, Sih-Han
    Wu, Chun-Hsien
    Wu, Richard Chen-Yu
    Kuo, Wade Wei-Ting
    Lee, Yen-Hsi
    Li, Ryh-Chyr
    Lin, Yung-Yao
    Lin, Victor Chia-Hsiang
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (06) : 267 - 272
  • [7] A clinical evaluation of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in located prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Xu, Meng-Yao
    Zeng, Na
    Ma, Sheng
    Hua, Zi-Jin
    Zhang, Si-Han
    Xiang, Ji-Cheng
    Xiong, Yi-Fan
    Xia, Zhi-Yu
    Sun, Jian-Xuan
    Liu, Chen-Qian
    Xu, Jin-Zhou
    An, Ye
    Wang, Shao-Gang
    Xia, Qi Dong
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 204
  • [8] Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate
    Kao, W.
    Chung, C. -H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 177 - 177
  • [9] Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate
    Gupta, Narmada P.
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Nayyar, Rishi
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (09) : 1501 - 1505
  • [10] SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Song, C.
    Kreaden, U.
    Cheng, L.
    Yankovsky, A.
    Li, Y.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S54 - S54