Appraisal of Different Artificial Intelligence Techniques for the Prediction of Marble Strength

被引:9
|
作者
Jan, Muhammad Saqib [1 ,2 ]
Hussain, Sajjad [1 ,2 ]
Zahra, Rida [2 ]
Emad, Muhammad Zaka [3 ]
Khan, Naseer Muhammad [4 ]
Rehman, Zahid Ur [2 ]
Cao, Kewang [1 ,5 ]
Alarifi, Saad S. S. [6 ]
Raza, Salim [2 ]
Sherin, Saira [2 ]
Salman, Muhammad [7 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Art, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Min Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
[3] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Min Engn, Lahore 39161, Pakistan
[4] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Mil Coll Engn, Dept Sustainable Adv Geomech Engn, Risalpur 23200, Pakistan
[5] Korea Univ, Sch Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[6] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Geol & Geophys, POB 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[7] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
关键词
marble strength; direct and indirect methods; correlations analysis; artificial intelligence techniques; performance indicators; UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; NEURAL-NETWORKS; FLY-ASH; ROCKS;
D O I
10.3390/su15118835
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rock strength, specifically the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), is a critical parameter mostly used in the effective and sustainable design of tunnels and other engineering structures. This parameter is determined using direct and indirect methods. The direct methods involve acquiring an NX core sample and using sophisticated laboratory procedures to determine UCS. However, the direct methods are time-consuming, expensive, and can yield uncertain results due to the presence of any flaws or discontinuities in the core sample. Therefore, most researchers prefer indirect methods for predicting rock strength. In this study, UCS was predicted using seven different artificial intelligence techniques: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), XG Boost Algorithm, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Elastic Net (EN), Lasso, and Ridge models. The input variables used for rock strength prediction were moisture content (MC), P-waves, and rebound number (R). Four performance indicators were used to assess the efficacy of the models: coefficient of determination (R-2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Square Error (MSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The results show that the ANN model had the best performance indicators, with values of 0.9995, 0.2634, 0.0694, and 0.1642 for R-2, RMSE, MSE, and MAE, respectively. However, the XG Boost algorithm model performance was also excellent and comparable to the ANN model. Therefore, these two models were proposed for predicting UCS effectively. The outcomes of this research provide a theoretical foundation for field professionals in predicting the strength parameters of rock for the effective and sustainable design of engineering structures
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Cancer Prediction and Diagnosis
    Kumar, Yogesh
    Gupta, Surbhi
    Singla, Ruchi
    Hu, Yu-Chen
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 29 (04) : 2043 - 2070
  • [42] Artificial intelligence techniques for pavement performance prediction: a systematic review
    Kang, Jianqi
    Tavassoti, Pejoohan
    Chaudhry, Muhammad Nuh Ali Reza
    Baaj, Hassan
    Ghafurian, Moojan
    ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2025, 26 (03) : 497 - 522
  • [43] Stock Market Prediction with Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Recession Times
    Valle-Cruz, David
    Fernandez-Cortez, Vanessa
    López-Chau, Asdrúbal
    Rojas-Hernández, Rafael
    Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2024, 2047 CCIS : 246 - 263
  • [44] Prediction of swelling pressure of soil using artificial intelligence techniques
    Das, Sarat Kumar
    Samui, Pijush
    Sabat, Akshaya Kumar
    Sitharam, T. G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2010, 61 (02) : 393 - 403
  • [45] Prediction of heart failure decompensations using artificial intelligence techniques
    Escolar Perez, V. Vanessa
    Lozano, A.
    Larburu, N.
    Kerexeta, J.
    Artetxe, A.
    Artola, G.
    Alvarez, R.
    Juez, B.
    Echebarria, A.
    Azcona, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 220 - 220
  • [46] Prediction of toxic metals concentration using artificial intelligence techniques
    Gholami R.
    Kamkar-Rouhani A.
    Doulati Ardejani F.
    Maleki S.
    Applied Water Science, 2011, 1 (3-4) : 125 - 134
  • [47] Prediction of Maximum Dry Density and Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement Stabilised Soil Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Suman S.
    Mahamaya M.
    Das S.K.
    International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2016, 2 (2)
  • [48] Applying Different Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Dynamic Poisson's Ratio Prediction Using Drilling Parameters
    Siddig, Osama
    Gamal, Hany
    Elkatatny, Salaheldin
    Abdulraheem, Abdulazeez
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (07):
  • [49] Manager Appraisal of Artificial Intelligence Investments
    Queiroz, Magno
    Anand, Abhijith
    Baird, Aaron
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 41 (03) : 682 - 707
  • [50] Ternary blended concrete strength evaluation: experimental and artificial intelligence techniques
    Oyebisi, Solomon
    Shammas, Mahaad Issa
    Owamah, Hilary
    Oladeji, Samuel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2024,