Appraisal of Different Artificial Intelligence Techniques for the Prediction of Marble Strength

被引:9
|
作者
Jan, Muhammad Saqib [1 ,2 ]
Hussain, Sajjad [1 ,2 ]
Zahra, Rida [2 ]
Emad, Muhammad Zaka [3 ]
Khan, Naseer Muhammad [4 ]
Rehman, Zahid Ur [2 ]
Cao, Kewang [1 ,5 ]
Alarifi, Saad S. S. [6 ]
Raza, Salim [2 ]
Sherin, Saira [2 ]
Salman, Muhammad [7 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Art, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Min Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
[3] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Min Engn, Lahore 39161, Pakistan
[4] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Mil Coll Engn, Dept Sustainable Adv Geomech Engn, Risalpur 23200, Pakistan
[5] Korea Univ, Sch Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[6] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Geol & Geophys, POB 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[7] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
关键词
marble strength; direct and indirect methods; correlations analysis; artificial intelligence techniques; performance indicators; UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; NEURAL-NETWORKS; FLY-ASH; ROCKS;
D O I
10.3390/su15118835
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rock strength, specifically the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), is a critical parameter mostly used in the effective and sustainable design of tunnels and other engineering structures. This parameter is determined using direct and indirect methods. The direct methods involve acquiring an NX core sample and using sophisticated laboratory procedures to determine UCS. However, the direct methods are time-consuming, expensive, and can yield uncertain results due to the presence of any flaws or discontinuities in the core sample. Therefore, most researchers prefer indirect methods for predicting rock strength. In this study, UCS was predicted using seven different artificial intelligence techniques: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), XG Boost Algorithm, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Elastic Net (EN), Lasso, and Ridge models. The input variables used for rock strength prediction were moisture content (MC), P-waves, and rebound number (R). Four performance indicators were used to assess the efficacy of the models: coefficient of determination (R-2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Square Error (MSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The results show that the ANN model had the best performance indicators, with values of 0.9995, 0.2634, 0.0694, and 0.1642 for R-2, RMSE, MSE, and MAE, respectively. However, the XG Boost algorithm model performance was also excellent and comparable to the ANN model. Therefore, these two models were proposed for predicting UCS effectively. The outcomes of this research provide a theoretical foundation for field professionals in predicting the strength parameters of rock for the effective and sustainable design of engineering structures
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete
    Dong Van Dao
    Hai-Bang Ly
    Son Hoang Trinh
    Tien-Thinh Le
    Binh Thai Pham
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (06)
  • [22] Prediction of Concrete Compressive Strength Using Artificial Intelligence Methods
    Muliauwan, H. N.
    Prayogo, D.
    Gaby, G.
    Harsono, K.
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE, 2020, 1625
  • [23] Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease
    van Smeden, Maarten
    Heinze, Georg
    Van Calster, Ben
    Asselbergs, Folkert W.
    Vardas, Panos E.
    Bruining, Nico
    de Jaegere, Peter
    Moore, Jason H.
    Denaxas, Spiros
    Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (31) : 2921 - 2930
  • [24] Comparison of Supervised Techniques of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases
    Comas-Gonzalez, Z.
    Mardini-Bovea, J.
    Salcedo, D.
    De-la-Hoz-Franco, E.
    HCI INTERNATIONAL 2023 LATE BREAKING PAPERS, HCII 2023, PT VI, 2023, 14059 : 58 - 68
  • [25] Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for prediction of soil temperatures in Turkey
    Citakoglu, Hatice
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2017, 130 (1-2) : 545 - 556
  • [26] Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Temperature Prediction in a Polymerization Process
    Leite, Manuela Souza
    dos Santos, Brunno Ferreira
    Ferrareso Lona, Liliane Maria
    da Silva, Flavio Vasconcelos
    Frattini Fileti, Ana Maria
    ICHEAP-10: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 24 : 385 - 390
  • [27] Artificial intelligence techniques for driving safety and vehicle crash prediction
    Halim, Zahid
    Kalsoom, Rizwana
    Bashir, Shariq
    Abbas, Ghulam
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2016, 46 (03) : 351 - 387
  • [28] Prediction of swelling pressure of soil using artificial intelligence techniques
    Sarat Kumar Das
    Pijush Samui
    Akshaya Kumar Sabat
    T. G. Sitharam
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2010, 61 : 393 - 403
  • [29] CatBoost model and artificial intelligence techniques for corporate failure prediction
    Ben Jabeur, Sami
    Gharib, Cheima
    Mefteh-Wali, Salma
    Ben Arfi, Wissal
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 166
  • [30] Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Landslides Prediction Using Satellite Imagery
    Sharma, Akanksha
    Chopra, Shakti Raj
    Sapate, Suhas Gajanan
    Arora, Krishan
    Rahmani, Mohammad Khalid Imam
    Jha, Sudan
    Ahmad, Sultan
    Ahmed, Md Ezaz
    Abdeljaber, Hikmat A. M.
    Nazeer, Jabeen
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 117318 - 117334