Gut feeling for the diagnosis of cancer in general practice: a diagnostic accuracy review

被引:1
|
作者
Yao, Masahiro [1 ]
Kaneko, Makoto [2 ]
Watson, Jessica [3 ]
Irving, Greg [4 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama Hodogaya Cent Hosp, Japan Community Healthcare Org, Dept Family & Community Med, Yokohama, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Yokohama, Japan
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, England
[4] Edge Hill Univ Fac Hlth & Social Care, Hlth Res Inst, Ormskirk, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; Adult oncology; MEDICAL HISTORY; Risk management; PRIMARY-CARE; METAANALYSIS; SUSPICION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068549
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesDiagnostic delay in cancer is a challenge in primary care. Although screening tests are effective in diagnosing some cancers such as breast, colorectal and cervical cancers, symptom-based cancer diagnosis is often difficult due to its low incidence in primary care and the influence of patient anxiety, doctor-patient relationship and psychosocial context. A general practitioner's gut feeling for cancer may play a role in the early diagnosis of cancer in primary care where diagnostic resources are limited. The aim of this study is to summarise existing evidence about the test accuracy of gut feeling (index test) in symptomatic adult patients presenting to general practice, compared with multidisciplinary team-confirmed diagnosis of cancer (reference standard). DesignDiagnostic accuracy review following Cochrane methods was performed. Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Medion databases. Eligibility criteriaCross-sectional, cohort and randomised studies of test accuracy that compared gut feeling (index test) with an appropriate cancer diagnosis (reference standard). No language or publication status restrictions were applied. We included all studies published before 25 March 2022. Data extraction and synthesisMethodological quality was appraised, using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Meta-analysis with hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models was used. ResultsOf 1286 potentially relevant studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria. For two of the six studies, data could not be extracted despite contacting authors. No studies satisfied all QUADAS-2 criteria. After meta-analysis of data from the remaining studies, the summary point of HSROC had a sensitivity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.53) and a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.92). ConclusionsGut feeling for cancer when used in symptomatic adult patients in general practice has a relatively low sensitivity and high specificity. When the prevalence of cancer in the symptomatic population presenting in general practice exceeds 1.15%, the performance of gut feeling reaches the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 3% positive predictive value threshold for action, which recommends urgent access to specialist care and further investigations. The findings support the continued and expanded use of gut feeling items in referral pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy for the diagnosis of bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Do Kyung
    Kim, Yon Hee
    Lee, Hyun Young
    Lee, Soomin
    Doo, Seung Whan
    Yang, Won Jae
    Song, Yun Seob
    Kim, Ki Hyun
    Kim, Jae Heon
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (02) : 426 - 433
  • [32] Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yun Tang
    Xingsheng Li
    Qing Jiang
    Lingyun Zhai
    Insights into Imaging, 14
  • [33] Endometrial Cytology in Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy
    Wang, Ting
    Jiang, Ruoan
    Yao, Yingsha
    Wang, Yaping
    Liu, Wu
    Qian, Linhua
    Li, Juanqing
    Weimer, Joerg
    Huang, Xiufeng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [34] The diagnostic test accuracy of rectal examination for prostate cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients: a systematic review
    Daniel Jones
    Charlotte Friend
    Andreas Dreher
    Victoria Allgar
    Una Macleod
    BMC Family Practice, 19
  • [35] Predictors of accuracy of diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice
    Zwar, Nicholas A.
    Marks, Guy B.
    Hermiz, Oshana
    Middleton, Sandy
    Comino, Elizabeth J.
    Hasan, Iqbal
    Vagholkar, Sanjyot
    Wilson, Stephen F.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2011, 195 (04) : 168 - 171
  • [36] ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSIS OF PSYCHOSIS ON GENERAL-PRACTICE COMPUTER-SYSTEM
    NAZARETH, I
    KING, M
    HAINES, A
    RANGEL, L
    MYERS, S
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6895): : 32 - 34
  • [37] Educational intervention to improve diagnostic accuracy regarding psychological morbidity in general practice
    Schneider, Antonius
    Mayer, Verena
    Dinkel, Andreas
    Wagenpfeil, Stefan
    Linde, Klaus
    Henningsen, Peter
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2019, 147 : 20 - 27
  • [38] Diagnostic accuracy of the Gerontological Personality Disorder Scale (GPS) in Dutch general practice
    Penders, Krystle A. P.
    Rossi, Gina
    Metsemakers, Job F. M.
    Duimel-Peeters, Inge G. P.
    van Alphen, Sebastiaan P. J.
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 20 (03) : 318 - 328
  • [39] Accuracy of SelectMDx compared to mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Reza Sari Motlagh
    Takafumi Yanagisawa
    Tatsushi Kawada
    Ekaterina Laukhtina
    Pawel Rajwa
    Abdulmajeed Aydh
    Frederik König
    Maximilan Pallauf
    Nicolai A. Huebner
    Pascal A. Baltzer
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    Axel Heidenreich
    Shahrokh F. Shariat
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2022, 25 : 187 - 198
  • [40] Accuracy of SelectMDx compared to mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Sari Motlagh, Reza
    Yanagisawa, Takafumi
    Kawada, Tatsushi
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Aydh, Abdulmajeed
    Koenig, Frederik
    Pallauf, Maximilan
    Huebner, Nicolai A.
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2022, 25 (02) : 187 - 198