Gut feeling for the diagnosis of cancer in general practice: a diagnostic accuracy review

被引:1
|
作者
Yao, Masahiro [1 ]
Kaneko, Makoto [2 ]
Watson, Jessica [3 ]
Irving, Greg [4 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama Hodogaya Cent Hosp, Japan Community Healthcare Org, Dept Family & Community Med, Yokohama, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Yokohama, Japan
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, England
[4] Edge Hill Univ Fac Hlth & Social Care, Hlth Res Inst, Ormskirk, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; Adult oncology; MEDICAL HISTORY; Risk management; PRIMARY-CARE; METAANALYSIS; SUSPICION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068549
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesDiagnostic delay in cancer is a challenge in primary care. Although screening tests are effective in diagnosing some cancers such as breast, colorectal and cervical cancers, symptom-based cancer diagnosis is often difficult due to its low incidence in primary care and the influence of patient anxiety, doctor-patient relationship and psychosocial context. A general practitioner's gut feeling for cancer may play a role in the early diagnosis of cancer in primary care where diagnostic resources are limited. The aim of this study is to summarise existing evidence about the test accuracy of gut feeling (index test) in symptomatic adult patients presenting to general practice, compared with multidisciplinary team-confirmed diagnosis of cancer (reference standard). DesignDiagnostic accuracy review following Cochrane methods was performed. Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Medion databases. Eligibility criteriaCross-sectional, cohort and randomised studies of test accuracy that compared gut feeling (index test) with an appropriate cancer diagnosis (reference standard). No language or publication status restrictions were applied. We included all studies published before 25 March 2022. Data extraction and synthesisMethodological quality was appraised, using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Meta-analysis with hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models was used. ResultsOf 1286 potentially relevant studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria. For two of the six studies, data could not be extracted despite contacting authors. No studies satisfied all QUADAS-2 criteria. After meta-analysis of data from the remaining studies, the summary point of HSROC had a sensitivity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.53) and a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.92). ConclusionsGut feeling for cancer when used in symptomatic adult patients in general practice has a relatively low sensitivity and high specificity. When the prevalence of cancer in the symptomatic population presenting in general practice exceeds 1.15%, the performance of gut feeling reaches the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 3% positive predictive value threshold for action, which recommends urgent access to specialist care and further investigations. The findings support the continued and expanded use of gut feeling items in referral pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Beating Cancer with a Gut Feeling
    Gorjifard, Sayeh
    Goldszmid, Romina S.
    CELL HOST & MICROBE, 2015, 18 (06) : 646 - 648
  • [22] Diagnosis in General Practice When no diagnostic label is applied
    Jones, Roger
    Barraclough, Kevin
    Dowrick, Christopher
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 1302 - 1304
  • [23] Erratum to: Towards improving diagnosis of memory loss in general practice: TIMeLi diagnostic test accuracy study protocol
    Sam T. Creavin
    Sarah J. Cullum
    Judy Haworth
    Lesley Wye
    Antony Bayer
    Mark Fish
    Sarah Purdy
    Yoav Ben-Shlomo
    BMC Family Practice, 17
  • [24] The challenges of early diagnosis of cancer in general practice
    Emery, Jon D.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2015, 203 (10) : 391 - +
  • [25] Early diagnosis of cancer - the role of general practice
    Vedsted, Peter
    Olesen, Frede
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2009, 27 (04) : 193 - 194
  • [26] Role of general practice in the diagnosis of oral cancer
    Crossman, Timothy
    Warburton, Fiona
    Richards, Michael A.
    Smith, Helen
    Ramirez, Amanda
    Forbes, Lindsay J. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 54 (02): : 208 - 212
  • [27] Diagnosis in General Practice Diagnostic strategies used in primary care
    Heneghan, C.
    Glasziou, P.
    Thompson, M.
    Rose, P.
    Balla, J.
    Lasserson, D.
    Scott, C.
    Perera, R.
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 1003 - 1005
  • [28] Delay in diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice
    Bjerager, Marianne
    Palshof, Torben
    Dahl, Ronald
    Vedsted, Peter
    Olesen, Frede
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2006, 56 (532): : 863 - 868
  • [29] The diagnostic test accuracy of rectal examination for prostate cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients: a systematic review
    Jones, Daniel
    Friend, Charlotte
    Dreher, Andreas
    Allgar, Victoria
    Macleod, Una
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [30] Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Yun
    Li, Xingsheng
    Jiang, Qing
    Zhai, Lingyun
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2023, 14 (01)