Gut feeling for the diagnosis of cancer in general practice: a diagnostic accuracy review

被引:1
|
作者
Yao, Masahiro [1 ]
Kaneko, Makoto [2 ]
Watson, Jessica [3 ]
Irving, Greg [4 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama Hodogaya Cent Hosp, Japan Community Healthcare Org, Dept Family & Community Med, Yokohama, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Yokohama, Japan
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, England
[4] Edge Hill Univ Fac Hlth & Social Care, Hlth Res Inst, Ormskirk, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; Adult oncology; MEDICAL HISTORY; Risk management; PRIMARY-CARE; METAANALYSIS; SUSPICION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068549
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesDiagnostic delay in cancer is a challenge in primary care. Although screening tests are effective in diagnosing some cancers such as breast, colorectal and cervical cancers, symptom-based cancer diagnosis is often difficult due to its low incidence in primary care and the influence of patient anxiety, doctor-patient relationship and psychosocial context. A general practitioner's gut feeling for cancer may play a role in the early diagnosis of cancer in primary care where diagnostic resources are limited. The aim of this study is to summarise existing evidence about the test accuracy of gut feeling (index test) in symptomatic adult patients presenting to general practice, compared with multidisciplinary team-confirmed diagnosis of cancer (reference standard). DesignDiagnostic accuracy review following Cochrane methods was performed. Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Medion databases. Eligibility criteriaCross-sectional, cohort and randomised studies of test accuracy that compared gut feeling (index test) with an appropriate cancer diagnosis (reference standard). No language or publication status restrictions were applied. We included all studies published before 25 March 2022. Data extraction and synthesisMethodological quality was appraised, using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Meta-analysis with hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models was used. ResultsOf 1286 potentially relevant studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria. For two of the six studies, data could not be extracted despite contacting authors. No studies satisfied all QUADAS-2 criteria. After meta-analysis of data from the remaining studies, the summary point of HSROC had a sensitivity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.53) and a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.92). ConclusionsGut feeling for cancer when used in symptomatic adult patients in general practice has a relatively low sensitivity and high specificity. When the prevalence of cancer in the symptomatic population presenting in general practice exceeds 1.15%, the performance of gut feeling reaches the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 3% positive predictive value threshold for action, which recommends urgent access to specialist care and further investigations. The findings support the continued and expanded use of gut feeling items in referral pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The accuracy of clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis in Dutch general practice: a diagnostic accuracy study
    Watjer, Roeland M.
    Bonten, Tobias N.
    Arkesteijn, Maikel A. H. M.
    Quint, Koen
    Beek, Martha T. van der
    Helmer, Liesbeth M. H. van der Raaij-
    Numans, Mattijs E.
    Eekhof, Just A. H.
    BJGP OPEN, 2023, 7 (03)
  • [2] Establishing a research agenda on gut feeling in general practice
    Cadier, Sebastien
    Le Reste, Jean-Yves
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2008, (83): : 70S - 71S
  • [3] The Accuracy of a Fibromyalgia Diagnosis in General Practice
    Gittins, Rosalind
    Howard, Molly
    Ghodke, Ameer
    Ives, Timothy J.
    Chelminski, Paul
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (03) : 491 - 498
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of peak flow variability in patients with suspected diagnosis of asthma in general practice
    Tilemann, L.
    Gindner, L.
    Meyer, F. J.
    Laux, G.
    Szecsenyi, J.
    Schneider, A.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2009, 134 (41) : 2053 - 2058
  • [5] The diagnostic value of macroscopic haematuria for the diagnosis of urological cancer in general practice
    Bruyninckx, R
    Buntinx, F
    Aertgeerts, B
    Van Casteren, V
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2003, 53 (486): : 31 - 35
  • [6] The diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer diagnosis: a review
    Pier Paolo Avolio
    Giovanni Lughezzani
    Maurice Anidjar
    Toufic Hassan
    Alexis Rompré-Brodeur
    Nicolò Maria Buffi
    Massimo Lazzeri
    Rafael Sanchez-Salas
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 3267 - 3276
  • [7] The diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer diagnosis: a review
    Avolio, Pier Paolo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Hassan, Toufic
    Rompre-Brodeur, Alexis
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (11) : 3267 - 3276
  • [8] DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF TRANSRECTAL ELASTOSONOGRAPHY IMAGING FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Aboumarzouk, Omar M.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    Melzer, A.
    Corner, G.
    Nabi, Ghulam
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A264 - A264
  • [9] A CRITICAL REVIEW OF DIAGNOSIS IN GENERAL PRACTICE
    BLOOR, DU
    PRACTITIONER, 1962, 189 (1133) : 660 - &
  • [10] The role of general practice in routes to diagnosis of lung cancer in Denmark: a population-based study of general practice involvement, diagnostic activity and diagnostic intervals
    Guldbrandt, Louise Mahncke
    Fenger-Gron, Morten
    Rasmussen, Torben Riis
    Jensen, Henry
    Vedsted, Peter
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15