Free public transit and voter turnout

被引:1
|
作者
Pereira, Rafael H. M. [1 ]
Vieira, Renato S. [2 ]
Bizzarro, Fernando [3 ]
Barbosa, Rogerio J. [4 ]
Dahis, Ricardo [5 ]
Ferreira, Daniel T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Ipea Inst Appl Econ Res, Brasilia, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Yale Univ, Yale, CO USA
[4] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Monash Univ, Monash, Australia
[6] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Electoral behavior; Voting behavior; Voting costs; Fare-free public transport; Urban transportation; MOBILITY; COSTS; REGISTRATION; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102690
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Transportation costs are an under-studied barrier to political participation. In many elections worldwide, subsidies to voter transportation are already provided or are under discussion. However, these types of incentives have not been rigorously evaluated. Here we examine possibly the world's largest-ever intervention to lower these costs, the adoption of a fare-free public transit policy in Brazil during the 2022 national election, when about half of Brazilian voters were granted the right to use public transit for free on election days. However, while some cities adopted the benefit for both rounds of the election, others adopted it only for the second round. Using an event study design, we exploit this difference in adoption timing to examine the policy's causal impact on voter turnout rates and human mobility levels. We find that fare-free transit increased ridership between 7.2% and 17.5% on election days, however, we estimate a precise and robust null effect of the policy on voter turnout (Coef. -0.03p.p. with standard error of 0.22p.p.). Our results illustrate that monetary transport costs may not always be a critical factor behind non-participation. Although reducing transportation costs improves access to polling places, we show that even a full transit subsidy may not be sufficient to increase voter turnout.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Family structure and voter turnout
    Wolfinger, Nicholas H.
    Wolfinger, Raymond E.
    SOCIAL FORCES, 2008, 86 (04) : 1513 - 1528
  • [42] VOTER TURNOUT NOT SO BAD
    EINOLF, DM
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1994, 72 (06) : 3 - 3
  • [43] Easy registration and voter turnout
    Highton, B
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1997, 59 (02): : 565 - 575
  • [44] Birth Order and Voter Turnout
    Bratsberg, Bernt
    Dawes, Christopher T.
    Kotsadam, Andreas
    Lindgren, Karl-Oskar
    Ohrvall, Richard
    Oskarsson, Sven
    Raaum, Oddbjorn
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 52 (01) : 475 - 482
  • [45] The personal vote and voter turnout
    Robbins, Joseph W.
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2010, 29 (04) : 661 - 672
  • [46] Voter turnout in city elections
    Wood, C
    URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 2002, 38 (02) : 209 - 231
  • [47] What affects voter turnout?
    Blais, Andre
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 9 : 111 - 125
  • [48] Voter turnout and the size of government
    Aggeborn, Linuz
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 43 : 29 - 40
  • [49] Voter Turnout and Preference Aggregation
    Kawai, K. E., I
    Toyama, Yuta
    Watanabe, Yasutora
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2021, 13 (04) : 548 - 586
  • [50] Social networks and voter turnout
    Kernell, Georgia
    Lamberson, P. J.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 10 (10):