Free public transit and voter turnout

被引:1
|
作者
Pereira, Rafael H. M. [1 ]
Vieira, Renato S. [2 ]
Bizzarro, Fernando [3 ]
Barbosa, Rogerio J. [4 ]
Dahis, Ricardo [5 ]
Ferreira, Daniel T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Ipea Inst Appl Econ Res, Brasilia, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Yale Univ, Yale, CO USA
[4] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Monash Univ, Monash, Australia
[6] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Electoral behavior; Voting behavior; Voting costs; Fare-free public transport; Urban transportation; MOBILITY; COSTS; REGISTRATION; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102690
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Transportation costs are an under-studied barrier to political participation. In many elections worldwide, subsidies to voter transportation are already provided or are under discussion. However, these types of incentives have not been rigorously evaluated. Here we examine possibly the world's largest-ever intervention to lower these costs, the adoption of a fare-free public transit policy in Brazil during the 2022 national election, when about half of Brazilian voters were granted the right to use public transit for free on election days. However, while some cities adopted the benefit for both rounds of the election, others adopted it only for the second round. Using an event study design, we exploit this difference in adoption timing to examine the policy's causal impact on voter turnout rates and human mobility levels. We find that fare-free transit increased ridership between 7.2% and 17.5% on election days, however, we estimate a precise and robust null effect of the policy on voter turnout (Coef. -0.03p.p. with standard error of 0.22p.p.). Our results illustrate that monetary transport costs may not always be a critical factor behind non-participation. Although reducing transportation costs improves access to polling places, we show that even a full transit subsidy may not be sufficient to increase voter turnout.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Correlates of Voter Turnout
    Frank, Richard W.
    Coma, Ferran Martinez, I
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2023, 45 (02) : 607 - 633
  • [12] UNIONISM AND VOTER TURNOUT
    DELANEY, JT
    MASTERS, MF
    SCHWOCHAU, S
    JOURNAL OF LABOR RESEARCH, 1988, 9 (03) : 221 - 236
  • [13] Decentralization and voter turnout
    Blais, Andre
    Anduiza, Eva
    Gallego, Aina
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2011, 29 (02): : 297 - 320
  • [14] Television and voter turnout
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 121 (03): : 931 - 972
  • [15] Politics - Voter turnout
    Doyle, R
    SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2000, 283 (05) : 23 - 23
  • [16] On the Representativeness of Voter Turnout
    Kaplow, Louis
    Kominers, Scott Duke
    JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2024, 67 (04): : 879 - 904
  • [17] The elasticity of voter turnout: Investing 85 cents per voter to increase voter turnout by 4 percent
    Schelker, Mark
    Schneiter, Marco
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2017, 49 : 65 - 74
  • [18] Correction to: Voter ID Laws and Voter Turnout
    Lauren R. Heller
    Jocelyne Miller
    E. Frank Stephenson
    Atlantic Economic Journal, 2019, 47 (2) : 241 - 241
  • [19] Election Frequency and Voter Turnout
    Kostelka, Filip
    Krejcova, Eva
    Sauger, Nicolas
    Wuttke, Alexander
    COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2023, 56 (14) : 2231 - 2268
  • [20] VOTER TURNOUT IN RUNOFF ELECTIONS
    WRIGHT, SG
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1989, 51 (02): : 385 - 396