Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care: Analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study

被引:2
|
作者
De Poli, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Oyebode, Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Social Policy, London, England
[3] Univ Bradford, Fac Hlth Studies, Ctr Appl Dementia Studies, Bradford, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 12期
关键词
PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ETHICS; COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH; YOUNG-PEOPLE; CHALLENGES; COMMITTEES; VULNERABILITY; OVERSIGHT; KNOWLEDGE; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0296223
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Current research ethics frameworks were developed on the footprint of biomedical, experimental research and present several pitfalls when applied to non-experimental social sciences. This work explores how the normative principles underpinning policy and regulatory frameworks of research ethics and the related operational processes work in practice in the context of collaborative health and social care research. The work was organised in three phases. First, UK research ethics policy documents were analysed thematically, with themes further organised under the categories of 'Principles' and 'Processes'. Next, we conducted a scoping review of articles about research ethics in the context of collaborative health and social care research, published in English between 2010 and 2022. We then held an exploratory focus group with ten academic researchers with relevant experience to gather their views on how the research ethics system works in practice in England (UK). The thematic framework developed in the first phase supported the analysis of the articles included in the scoping review and of focus group data. The analysis of policy documents identified twelve themes. All were associated to both a principle and a related operational process. The scoping review identified 31 articles. Across these, some themes were barely acknowledged (e.g., Compliance with legislation). Other themes were extensively covered (e.g., The working of Research Ethics Committees), often to discuss issues and limitations in how, in practice, the research ethics system and its processes deal with collaborative research and to suggest options for improvement. Focus group data were largely consistent with the findings of the scoping review. This work provides evidence of the poor alignment between how the research ethics system is normatively expected to work and how it works in practice and offers options that could make research ethics more fit for purpose when addressing collaborative research in health and social care.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] International Marketing Ethics: A Literature Review and Research Agenda
    Rajshekhar G. Javalgi
    La Toya M. Russell
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 148 : 703 - 720
  • [42] Family Business Ethics: A Literature Review and Research Agenda
    Ferasso, Marcos
    Beliaeva, Tatiana
    Kraus, Sascha
    Jones, Paul
    Gossling, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2025,
  • [43] The Defining Characteristics of Ethics Papers on Social Media Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Al-Zaman, Md. Sayeed
    Khemka, Ayushi
    Zhang, Andy
    Rockwell, Geoffrey
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2024, 22 (01) : 163 - 189
  • [44] Sex Work Research, Ethics Review Processes, and Institutional Challenges for "Sensitive" Collaborative Research
    Ferris, Shawna
    Lebovitch, Amy
    Allard, Danielle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2021, 20
  • [45] The Defining Characteristics of Ethics Papers on Social Media Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Md. Sayeed Al-Zaman
    Ayushi Khemka
    Andy Zhang
    Geoffrey Rockwell
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024, 22 : 163 - 189
  • [46] The Application of Ethics within Social Work Supervision: A Selected Literature and Research Review
    O'Donoghue, Kieran
    O'Donoghue, Rebekah
    ETHICS AND SOCIAL WELFARE, 2019, 13 (04) : 340 - 360
  • [47] International Marketing Ethics: A Literature Review and Research Agenda
    Javalgi, Rajshekhar G.
    Russell, La Toya M.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 148 (04) : 703 - 720
  • [48] Research ethics in The Union: an 8-year review of the Ethics Advisory Group
    Edginton, M. E.
    Ornstein, T.
    Denholm, J.
    El Sony, A.
    Kim, S. J.
    Narain, A.
    O'Brien, R.
    PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION, 2013, 3 (04): : 346 - 350
  • [49] From bench to bedside and to health policies: ethics in translational research
    Petrini, C.
    CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2011, 162 (01): : 51 - 59
  • [50] Social work research ethics in China: A scoping review of research involving human subjects during COVID-19
    Wang, Yixuan
    Wu, Shiyou
    He, Longtao
    Li, Linjing
    Wang, Zijiao
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 66 (01) : 233 - 253