Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care: Analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study

被引:2
|
作者
De Poli, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Oyebode, Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Social Policy, London, England
[3] Univ Bradford, Fac Hlth Studies, Ctr Appl Dementia Studies, Bradford, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 12期
关键词
PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ETHICS; COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH; YOUNG-PEOPLE; CHALLENGES; COMMITTEES; VULNERABILITY; OVERSIGHT; KNOWLEDGE; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0296223
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Current research ethics frameworks were developed on the footprint of biomedical, experimental research and present several pitfalls when applied to non-experimental social sciences. This work explores how the normative principles underpinning policy and regulatory frameworks of research ethics and the related operational processes work in practice in the context of collaborative health and social care research. The work was organised in three phases. First, UK research ethics policy documents were analysed thematically, with themes further organised under the categories of 'Principles' and 'Processes'. Next, we conducted a scoping review of articles about research ethics in the context of collaborative health and social care research, published in English between 2010 and 2022. We then held an exploratory focus group with ten academic researchers with relevant experience to gather their views on how the research ethics system works in practice in England (UK). The thematic framework developed in the first phase supported the analysis of the articles included in the scoping review and of focus group data. The analysis of policy documents identified twelve themes. All were associated to both a principle and a related operational process. The scoping review identified 31 articles. Across these, some themes were barely acknowledged (e.g., Compliance with legislation). Other themes were extensively covered (e.g., The working of Research Ethics Committees), often to discuss issues and limitations in how, in practice, the research ethics system and its processes deal with collaborative research and to suggest options for improvement. Focus group data were largely consistent with the findings of the scoping review. This work provides evidence of the poor alignment between how the research ethics system is normatively expected to work and how it works in practice and offers options that could make research ethics more fit for purpose when addressing collaborative research in health and social care.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Ethics of Research Biobanking: A Critical Review of the Literature
    Hoeyer, Klaus
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, VOL 25, 2008, 25 : 429 - 452
  • [22] Is social desirability bias important for effective ethics research? A review of literature
    Tan, Houng Chien
    Ho, Jo Ann
    Teoh, Guan Cheng
    Ng, Siew Imm
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2021, 10 (2) : 205 - 243
  • [23] Is social desirability bias important for effective ethics research? A review of literature
    Houng Chien Tan
    Jo Ann Ho
    Guan Cheng Teoh
    Siew Imm Ng
    Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2021, 10 : 205 - 243
  • [24] ethics in research with children: a review of the brazilian human and social sciences literature
    Costa Prado, Renata Lopes
    Goncalves Vicentin, Maria Cristina
    CHILDHOOD AND PHILOSOPHY, 2018, 14 (29): : 43 - 70
  • [25] A code of ethics for social work and social care research
    Butler, I
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2002, 32 (02): : 239 - 248
  • [26] Mapping research ethics committees in Africa: Evidence of the growth of ethics review of health research in Africa
    Mokgatla, Boitumelo
    IJsselmuiden, Carel
    Wassenaar, Doug
    Kasule, Mary
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (04) : 341 - 348
  • [27] Ethics in health research: A social science perspective
    Henley, Lesley
    Snyder, Jeremy C.
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2007, 7 (03) : 166 - 170
  • [28] The feminist health care ethics research network
    Thurston, WE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2001, 92 (04): : 312 - 312
  • [29] MLA ON RESEARCH, ETHICS, HEALTH-CARE
    DIMATTIA, S
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1994, 119 (13) : 14 - &
  • [30] In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
    Sheehan, Mark
    Dunn, Michael
    Sahan, Kate
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 44 (10) : 710 - 716