Latanoprost PF vs. Bimatoprost PF: Which Treats the Ocular Surface Better?

被引:0
|
作者
Dimtsas, Georgios S. [1 ]
Tsiogka, Anastasia [1 ]
Moschos, Marilita M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, G Gennimatas Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol 1, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
Latanoprost; Bimaroptost; MMP-9; glaucoma; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES; PROSTAGLANDIN ANALOGS; TEAR FLUID; GLAUCOMA; MATRIX-METALLOPROTEINASE-9; CORNEAL; DISEASE; HYPERTENSION; INFLAMMATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12216732
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: The current study aimed to compare two of the most frequently prescribed preservative-free (PF) antiglaucoma drops, (Latanoprost PF vs. Bimatoprost PF) in promoting OSD in patients with POAG. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, 44 eyes from 44 participants were included. In the control group we enrolled 24 eyes, 11 eyes treated only with Latanoprost PF were enrolled in the Latanoprost PF group, and 9 eyes treated only with Bimatoprost PF in the Bimatoprost PF group. In all eyes, we evaluated the ocular levels of MMP-9 using the InflammaDry kit. We also performed Schirmer's test and the TBUT test. (3) Results: We found elevated ocular levels of MMP-9 (>40 ng/mL) in the Bimatoprost PF group (88.89% of the participants) compared to the control (8.33%) and the Latanoprost PF group (27.27%), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The Schirmer's test values were statistically significantly lower in the Bimatoprost PF group compared to the other two groups. Additionally, the TBUT values were lower in the Bimatoprost PF group compared to the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: Latanoprost PF eye drops treat the ocular surface better and they do not induce overexpression of MMP-9, a molecule that is related to OSD.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LABScreen® Mixed vs. Flowpra® screen:: Which is better for routine monitoring of HLA antibodies?
    Heaney, Denise L.
    Marchman, Cindi G.
    Waslaske, Sheree H.
    Eckels, David D.
    Gebel, Howard M.
    Bray, Robert A.
    HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 67 (10) : S76 - S76
  • [42] ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging
    Ren, Jinchang
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2012, 26 : 144 - 153
  • [43] CHAL 9-Trade secret vs. patent protection: Which is better for you?
    Price, Griffith B., Jr.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 232
  • [44] A1C vs. Glucose Downloads-Which Is the Better Gold Standard?
    Perlman, Jordan E.
    Rosenbaum, Jennifer L.
    Mcnulty, Bridget K.
    Hirsch, Irl B.
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [45] KF vs. PF Performance Quality Observed from Stochastic Noises Statistics and Online Covariance Self-adaptation
    Chen, Ken
    Zhang, Meng
    Batur, Celal
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 125 : 291 - +
  • [46] A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Response Trial of Taprenepag Isopropyl (PF-04217329) Versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
    Schachar, Ronald A.
    Raber, Susan
    Courtney, Rachel
    Zhang, Min
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2011, 36 (09) : 809 - 817
  • [47] Phytotherapeutics in children: Clinical trials vs. Real World Data-which is the better approach?
    Nieber, K.
    Kelber, O.
    PLANTA MEDICA, 2022, 88 (15) : 1561 - 1561
  • [48] 'Weight Loss Surgery' Information on the Internet: Which Search Engine is Better? (Google vs. Yahoo)
    Green, S.
    Porter, L.
    Tan, B.
    Ahmed, J.
    Leeder, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 214 - 214
  • [49] Which is Better Individualized Training for a Novel, Complex Task? Learner Control vs. Feedback Algorithms
    Schroeder, Bradford L.
    Van Buskirk, Wendi L.
    Aros, Michelle
    Hochreiter, Jason E.
    Fraulini, Nicholas W.
    ADAPTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS, AIS 2023, 2023, 14044 : 236 - 252
  • [50] Blenderised Tube Feeds vs. Commercial Formula: Which Is Better for Gastrostomy-Fed Children?
    Chandrasekar, Neha
    Dehlsen, Kate
    Leach, Steven T.
    Krishnan, Usha
    NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (15)