Latanoprost PF vs. Bimatoprost PF: Which Treats the Ocular Surface Better?

被引:0
|
作者
Dimtsas, Georgios S. [1 ]
Tsiogka, Anastasia [1 ]
Moschos, Marilita M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, G Gennimatas Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol 1, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
Latanoprost; Bimaroptost; MMP-9; glaucoma; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES; PROSTAGLANDIN ANALOGS; TEAR FLUID; GLAUCOMA; MATRIX-METALLOPROTEINASE-9; CORNEAL; DISEASE; HYPERTENSION; INFLAMMATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12216732
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: The current study aimed to compare two of the most frequently prescribed preservative-free (PF) antiglaucoma drops, (Latanoprost PF vs. Bimatoprost PF) in promoting OSD in patients with POAG. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, 44 eyes from 44 participants were included. In the control group we enrolled 24 eyes, 11 eyes treated only with Latanoprost PF were enrolled in the Latanoprost PF group, and 9 eyes treated only with Bimatoprost PF in the Bimatoprost PF group. In all eyes, we evaluated the ocular levels of MMP-9 using the InflammaDry kit. We also performed Schirmer's test and the TBUT test. (3) Results: We found elevated ocular levels of MMP-9 (>40 ng/mL) in the Bimatoprost PF group (88.89% of the participants) compared to the control (8.33%) and the Latanoprost PF group (27.27%), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The Schirmer's test values were statistically significantly lower in the Bimatoprost PF group compared to the other two groups. Additionally, the TBUT values were lower in the Bimatoprost PF group compared to the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: Latanoprost PF eye drops treat the ocular surface better and they do not induce overexpression of MMP-9, a molecule that is related to OSD.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Cyclosporine vs. Tacrolimus: Which Is a Better Match With Everolimus?
    Patel, J.
    Kittleson, M.
    Moriguchi, J.
    Liou, F.
    Yu, Z.
    Yabuno, J.
    Azarbal, B.
    Chang, D.
    Czer, L.
    Kobashigawa, J.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 430 - 430
  • [12] Advertisement vs. Monetary Subsidy: Which is Better for Remanufacturing?
    Huang, Yanting
    Zheng, Benrong
    Wang, Zongjun
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 29 (03) : 344 - 359
  • [13] Advertisement vs. Monetary Subsidy: Which is Better for Remanufacturing?
    Yanting Huang
    Benrong Zheng
    Zongjun Wang
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2020, 29 : 344 - 359
  • [14] Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients Randomized to Benzalkonium Chloride-Containing Latanoprost and Preservative-Free Bimatoprost
    Wu, Jo-Hsuan
    Wang, Tsing-Hong
    Huang, Jehn-Yu
    Su, Chien-Chia
    JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 37 (10) : 556 - 564
  • [15] Induced vs. Voluntary Green Production: Which Is Better for Society?
    Buccella, Domenico
    Abakpa, Augustine
    POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 2023, 71 (01) : 89 - 103
  • [16] ROBOTIC VS. LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY FOR COLON CANCER: WHICH IS BETTER?
    Ahuja, Vanita
    Paredes, Lucero G.
    Perkal, Melissa
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S1550 - S1550
  • [17] Bricks vs. clicks: Which is better for marketing remanufactured products?
    Yan, Wei
    Xiong, Yu
    Xiong, Zhongkai
    Guo, Nian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 242 (02) : 434 - 444
  • [18] Microscale vs. macroscale: Which allows students to learn better?
    Ovitsky, JL
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 219 : U407 - U407
  • [19] Capturing the effect of [PF3(C2F5)3]-vs. [PF6]-, flexible anion vs. rigid, and scaled charge vs. unit on the transport properties of [bmim]+-based ionic liquids: a comparative MD study
    Kowsari, Mohammad H.
    Ebrahimi, Soraya
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 20 (19) : 13379 - 13393
  • [20] Tricuspid Valve Replacement, Mechnical vs. Biological Valve, Which Is Better?
    Altaani, Haitham Akram
    Jaber, Saed
    INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (02) : 71 - 74