Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector- a rapid evidence review

被引:0
|
作者
Garavito, German Andres Alarcon [1 ]
Moniz, Thomas [1 ]
Mansilla, Cristian [2 ]
Iqbal, Syka [1 ]
Dobrogowska, Rozalia [1 ]
Bennin, Fiona [1 ]
Talwar, Shivangi [1 ,3 ]
Khalid, Ahmad Firas [4 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Targeted Intervent, Rapid Res Evaluat & Appraisal Lab RREAL, London, England
[2] McMaster Univ, McMaster Hlth Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[4] York Univ, Sch Global Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Evidence network; Decision-making; Health policy; Knowledge translation; Knowledge broker; Evidence dissemination; Evidence-informed; PUBLIC-HEALTH; MIXED-METHODS; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; POLICY; COMMUNITIES; RELIABILITY; CHALLENGES; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10744-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEvidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.MethodsThe review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed.ResultsThe review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement.ConclusionsEvidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evidence for Health III: Making evidence-informed decisions that integrate values and context
    Andermann, Anne
    Pang, Tikki
    Newton, John N.
    Davis, Adrian
    Panisset, Ulysses
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [42] Competency profiles for evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM): a rapid review
    Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia
    Romao, Davi Mamblona Marques
    Setti, Cecilia
    Machado, Maria Lucia Teixeira
    Riera, Rachel
    Gomes, Romeu
    da Silva, Silvio Fernandes
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [43] Development and content validation of a measure to assess evidence-informed decision-making competence in public health nursing
    Belita, Emily
    Yost, Jennifer
    Squires, Janet E.
    Ganann, Rebecca
    Dobbins, Maureen
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [44] Lessons learned from Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Nutrition & Health (EVIDENT) in Africa: a project evaluation
    Pankti Motani
    Anais Van de Walle
    Richmond Aryeetey
    Roosmarijn Verstraeten
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 17
  • [45] Dynamics of evidence-informed health policy making in Pakistan
    Haq, Zaeem
    Hafeez, Assad
    Zafar, Shamsa
    Ghaffar, Abdul
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2017, 32 (10) : 1449 - 1456
  • [46] Strengthening Health Systems for Evidence-informed Policy Making
    Lahariya, Chandrakant
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 52 (11) : 931 - 932
  • [47] Strengthening health systems for evidence-informed policy making
    Chandrakant Lahariya
    Indian Pediatrics, 2015, 52 : 931 - 932
  • [48] Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review
    Fadi El-Jardali
    Lama Bou-Karroum
    Nadeen Hilal
    Maya Hammoud
    Nour Hemadi
    Michelle Assal
    Nour Kalach
    Aya Harb
    Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat
    Tyrone Reden Sy
    David Novillo-Ortiz
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 21
  • [49] Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    Bou-Karroum, Lama
    Hilal, Nadeen
    Hammoud, Maya
    Hemadi, Nour
    Assal, Michelle
    Kalach, Nour
    Harb, Aya
    Azzopardi-Muscat, Natasha
    Sy, Tyrone Reden
    Novillo-Ortiz, David
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [50] Making a case for evidence-informed decision making for participatory urban design
    Nisha, Bobby
    Nelson, Margaret
    URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 17 (04) : 336 - 348