Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector- a rapid evidence review

被引:0
|
作者
Garavito, German Andres Alarcon [1 ]
Moniz, Thomas [1 ]
Mansilla, Cristian [2 ]
Iqbal, Syka [1 ]
Dobrogowska, Rozalia [1 ]
Bennin, Fiona [1 ]
Talwar, Shivangi [1 ,3 ]
Khalid, Ahmad Firas [4 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Targeted Intervent, Rapid Res Evaluat & Appraisal Lab RREAL, London, England
[2] McMaster Univ, McMaster Hlth Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[4] York Univ, Sch Global Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Evidence network; Decision-making; Health policy; Knowledge translation; Knowledge broker; Evidence dissemination; Evidence-informed; PUBLIC-HEALTH; MIXED-METHODS; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; POLICY; COMMUNITIES; RELIABILITY; CHALLENGES; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10744-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEvidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.MethodsThe review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed.ResultsThe review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement.ConclusionsEvidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reflections on mentoring experiences for evidence-informed decision-making in South Africa and Malawi
    Jordaan, Sunet
    Stewart, Ruth
    Erasmus, Yvonne
    Maluwa, Louis
    Mitchell, Janine
    Langer, Laurenz
    Wildeman, Russell
    Tannous, Natalie
    Koch, Josee
    DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2018, 28 (04) : 456 - 467
  • [32] Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies
    Michelle M. Haby
    Evelina Chapman
    Rachel Clark
    Jorge Barreto
    Ludovic Reveiz
    John N. Lavis
    Implementation Science, 11
  • [33] Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies
    Haby, Michelle M.
    Chapman, Evelina
    Clark, Rachel
    Barreto, Jorge
    Reveiz, Ludovic
    Lavis, John N.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [34] Understanding the Role of Communities of Practice in Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health
    Meagher-Stewart, Donna
    Solberg, Shirley M.
    Warner, Grace
    MacDonald, Jo-Ann
    McPherson, Charmaine
    Seaman, Patricia
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (06) : 723 - 739
  • [35] An Organizational Intervention to Influence Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Home Health Nursing
    Gifford, Wendy
    Lefebre, Nancy
    Davies, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 44 (7-8): : 395 - 402
  • [36] Competency profiles for evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM): a rapid review
    Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
    Davi Mamblona Marques Romão
    Cecilia Setti
    Maria Lúcia Teixeira Machado
    Rachel Riera
    Romeu Gomes
    Silvio Fernandes da Silva
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 21
  • [37] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Considerations for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
    Palisano, Robert J.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 35 (03) : 213 - 217
  • [38] Evidence for Health III: Making evidence-informed decisions that integrate values and context
    Anne Andermann
    Tikki Pang
    John N Newton
    Adrian Davis
    Ulysses Panisset
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 14
  • [39] Rethinking evidence-based and evidence-informed practice: a call for evidence-informed decision making in social work education and child welfare practice
    Lwin, Kristen
    Beltrano, Natalie
    SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2022, 41 (02) : 166 - 174
  • [40] Lessons learned from Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Nutrition & Health (EVIDENT) in Africa: a project evaluation
    Motani, Pankti
    Van de Walle, Anais
    Aryeetey, Richmond
    Verstraeten, Roosmarijn
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (1)