The assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability when development is atypical. A Norwegian population study of individuals with CHARGE syndrome

被引:1
|
作者
Skei, Lynn [1 ,2 ]
Skei, Sigmund [3 ]
von Tetzchner, Stephen [1 ]
Hartshorne, Timothy [4 ]
Landro, Nils Inge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, Oslo, Norway
[2] Signo Resource Ctr, Sandefjord, Norway
[3] Cty Governor Vestfold & Telemark, Vestfold, Norway
[4] Cent MI Univ, Dept Psychol, Michigan, ND USA
关键词
Assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability; atypical development; CHARGE syndrome; population study; norm-referenced assessment; HEARING-LOSS; ADAPTIVE-BEHAVIOR; CHILDREN; ASSOCIATION; SPECTRUM; DISORDERS; MUTATIONS; PHENOTYPE; AUTISM;
D O I
10.1080/00207454.2023.2240485
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
AimThis paper aimed to answer how psychometric methods based on neurotypical populations can serve as valid instruments in the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability in individuals with atypical development. The genetic, structural, and functional features of CHARGE make it uniquely suited to address this question.MethodA Norwegian population of individuals with CHARGE (N = 35) underwent assessment procedures according to DSM-5 guidelines for the evaluation of an intellectual disability diagnosis. Results from cognitive testing (Wechsler Intelligence Scales) and parental evaluation of adaptive skills (Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scale) were obtained and compared to their respective norm samples to explore any methodological inconsistencies.ResultSignificant differences emerged between the participants and the norm samples. Global cognition obtained from Wechsler revealed a bimodal distribution, suggesting a two-group sample, with the youngest children forming their own subgroup. Comparisons of the different age-groups' performances demonstrated the lowest results among the preschoolers while the adults scored the highest. The global adaptive behavior score turned out significantly lower than the performance-based scores, thereby deflating the overall estimate of global intellectual abilities.ConclusionFor individuals with CHARGE, the effect of the atypicality seemed most apparent during early childhood, stabilizing and subsiding towards adulthood. The test results' interpretability was weakest for the preschoolers progressively increasing until peaking in adulthood, emphasizing the importance of delaying the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability. Because of several validity issues connected to the observation-based measure, complementary testing should precede clinical evaluations when possible in the diagnostics of individuals with CHARGE.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1133
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] A comparative study of cognitive and socio-emotional development in children with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and children with Autism Spectrum Disorder associated with a severe intellectual disability, and in young typically developing children with matched developmental ages
    Adrien, Jean-Louis
    Taupiac, Emmanuelle
    Thiebaut, Eric
    Paulais, Marie-Anna
    Van-Gils, Julien
    Kaye, Kelley
    Blanc, Romuald
    Gattegno, Maria Pilar
    Contejean, Yves
    Michel, Gregory
    Dean, Annika
    Barthelemy, Catherine
    Lacombe, Didier
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 116