The assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability when development is atypical. A Norwegian population study of individuals with CHARGE syndrome

被引:1
|
作者
Skei, Lynn [1 ,2 ]
Skei, Sigmund [3 ]
von Tetzchner, Stephen [1 ]
Hartshorne, Timothy [4 ]
Landro, Nils Inge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, Oslo, Norway
[2] Signo Resource Ctr, Sandefjord, Norway
[3] Cty Governor Vestfold & Telemark, Vestfold, Norway
[4] Cent MI Univ, Dept Psychol, Michigan, ND USA
关键词
Assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability; atypical development; CHARGE syndrome; population study; norm-referenced assessment; HEARING-LOSS; ADAPTIVE-BEHAVIOR; CHILDREN; ASSOCIATION; SPECTRUM; DISORDERS; MUTATIONS; PHENOTYPE; AUTISM;
D O I
10.1080/00207454.2023.2240485
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
AimThis paper aimed to answer how psychometric methods based on neurotypical populations can serve as valid instruments in the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability in individuals with atypical development. The genetic, structural, and functional features of CHARGE make it uniquely suited to address this question.MethodA Norwegian population of individuals with CHARGE (N = 35) underwent assessment procedures according to DSM-5 guidelines for the evaluation of an intellectual disability diagnosis. Results from cognitive testing (Wechsler Intelligence Scales) and parental evaluation of adaptive skills (Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scale) were obtained and compared to their respective norm samples to explore any methodological inconsistencies.ResultSignificant differences emerged between the participants and the norm samples. Global cognition obtained from Wechsler revealed a bimodal distribution, suggesting a two-group sample, with the youngest children forming their own subgroup. Comparisons of the different age-groups' performances demonstrated the lowest results among the preschoolers while the adults scored the highest. The global adaptive behavior score turned out significantly lower than the performance-based scores, thereby deflating the overall estimate of global intellectual abilities.ConclusionFor individuals with CHARGE, the effect of the atypicality seemed most apparent during early childhood, stabilizing and subsiding towards adulthood. The test results' interpretability was weakest for the preschoolers progressively increasing until peaking in adulthood, emphasizing the importance of delaying the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability. Because of several validity issues connected to the observation-based measure, complementary testing should precede clinical evaluations when possible in the diagnostics of individuals with CHARGE.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1133
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Identifying Individuals With Intellectual Disability Within a Population Study
    Franklin, Michelle S.
    Silva, Susan G.
    Maslow, Gary R.
    Halpern, Carolyn T.
    Merwin, Elizabeth, I
    Docherty, Sharron L.
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2020, 69 (06) : 436 - 447
  • [2] The assessment of need: A study of individuals assessed as not needing intellectual disability (ID) services
    Dodd, P
    Mulvany, F
    Guerin, S
    Mulcahy, M
    Hillery, J
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2004, 48 : 487 - 487
  • [3] Exploring the views and experiences of professionals using PBS and emotional development assessment for individuals with an intellectual disability: a case study
    McCarthy, Freya Elizabeth Rose
    Simpson, Stephanie Jane
    ADVANCES IN MENTAL HEALTH AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2025, 19 (01) : 12 - 22
  • [4] Cancer risk in individuals with intellectual disability in Sweden: A population-based cohort study
    Liu, Qianwei
    Adami, Hans-Olov
    Reichenberg, Abraham
    Kolevzon, Alexander
    Fang, Fang
    Sandin, Sven
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (10)
  • [5] Clinical Characteristics and Pharmacological Treatment of Individuals With and Without Intellectual Disability in Pre-trial Assessment-A Population-Based Study
    Edberg, Hanna
    Chen, Qi
    Andine, Peter
    Larsson, Henrik
    Hirvikoski, Tatja
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11
  • [6] Development of a new tool for predicting the behavior of individuals with intellectual disability in the dental office: A pilot study
    Varela, Ivan
    Fernandez-Feijoo, Javier
    Garcia, Eliane
    Diniz-Freitas, Marcio
    Martinez, Isabel
    Roca, Javier
    Diz, Pedro
    Limeres, Jacobo
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [7] CASE STUDY: Comprehensive Analysis of an Adolescent with Tourette Syndrome Diagnosis Comorbid with ADHD and Intellectual Disability
    Bakker, Liliana
    Pompa, Juan Pablo Paneiva
    Rubiales, Josefina
    Pala, Mariano
    CUADERNOS DE NEUROPSICOLOGIA-PANAMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 18 (01): : 87 - 97
  • [8] Neurologic Manifestations of Mucopolysaccaridosis Type VI Do Not Include Intellectual Disability: Reminder to Consider a Second Diagnosis When Faced with Atypical Presentations
    Lau, H.
    Famiglietti, H.
    Anstett, K.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2019, 86 : S83 - S83
  • [9] New Feeding Assessment Scale for individuals with genetic syndromes: Validity and reliability in the CHARGE syndrome population
    Hudson, Alexandra S.
    Stratton-Gadke, Kasee
    Hatchette, Jill
    Blake, Kim D.
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2021, 57 (08) : 1234 - 1243
  • [10] Qualification for upper secondary education in individuals with autism without intellectual disability: Total population study, Stockholm, Sweden
    Stark, Isidora
    Liao, Peiwen
    Magnusson, Cecilia
    Lundberg, Michael
    Rai, Dheeraj
    Lager, Anton
    Idring Nordstrom, Selma
    AUTISM, 2021, 25 (04) : 1036 - 1046