Improved soil carbon stock spatial prediction in a Mediterranean soil erosion site through robust machine learning techniques

被引:4
|
作者
Mosaid, Hassan [1 ]
Barakat, Ahmed [1 ]
John, Kingsley [2 ]
Faouzi, Elhousna [3 ]
Bustillo, Vincent [4 ,5 ]
El Garnaoui, Mohamed [3 ]
Heung, Brandon [2 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Moulay Slimane Univ, Fac Sci & Tech, Geomat Georesources & Environm Lab, Beni Mellal, Morocco
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Food & Environm Sci, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada
[3] Sultan Moulay Slimane Univ, Fac Sci & Tech, Data4Earth Lab, Beni Mellal, Morocco
[4] Univ Toulouse, CESBIO, CNES, INRAE,IRD,UPS,CNRS, Toulouse, France
[5] IUT Paul Sabatier, Auch, France
关键词
Carbon sequestration; Digital soil mapping; Predictive modeling; Soil erosion; Srou River; REMOTE-SENSING DATA; ORGANIC-CARBON; FEATURE-SELECTION; HEAVY-METAL; LAND; SUSCEPTIBILITY; SUITABILITY; DEPOSITION; MODELS; MATTER;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-024-12294-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil serves as a reservoir for organic carbon stock, which indicates soil quality and fertility within the terrestrial ecosystem. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock (SOCS) and the factors influencing it to achieve sustainable practices and ensure soil health. Thus, the present study aimed to apply four machine learning (ML) models, namely, random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), and Cubist model tree (Cubist), to improve the prediction of SOCS in the Srou catchment located in the Upper Oum Er-Rbia watershed, Morocco. From an inventory of 120 sample points, 80% were used for training the model, with the remaining 20% set aside for model testing. Boruta's algorithm and the multicollinearity test identified only nine (9) factors as the controlling factors selected as input data for predicting SOCS. As a result, spatial distribution maps for SOCS were generated for all models, then compared, and further validated using statistical metrics. Among the models tested, the RF model exhibited the best performance (R2 = 0.76, RMSE = 0.52 Mg C/ha, NRMSE = 0.13, and MAE = 0.34 Mg C/ha), followed closely by the SVM model (R2 = 0.68, RMSE = 0.59 Mg C/ha, NRMSE = 0.15, and MAE = 0.34 Mg C/ha) and Cubist model (R2 = 0.64, RMSE = 0.63 Mg C/ha, NRMSE = 0.16, and MAE = 0.43 Mg C/ha), while the kNN model had the lowest performance (R2 = 0.31, RMSE = 0.94 Mg C/ha, NRMSE = 0.24, and MAE = 0.63 Mg C/ha). However, bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, and calcium carbonate were the most important factors for spatially predicting SOCS in this semi-arid region. Hence, the methodology used in this study, which relies on ML algorithms, holds the potential for modeling and mapping SOCS and soil properties in comparable contexts elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Considering Regional Soil Erosion Based on Machine-Learning Models
    Huang, Faming
    Chen, Jiawu
    Du, Zhen
    Yao, Chi
    Huang, Jinsong
    Jiang, Qinghui
    Chang, Zhilu
    Li, Shu
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (06)
  • [32] Machine Learning Based On-Line Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon after Removal of Soil Moisture Effect
    Nawar, Said
    Munnaf, Muhammad Abdul
    Mouazen, Abdul Mounem
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [33] Combining spatial autocorrelation with machine learning increases prediction accuracy of soil heavy metals
    Sergeev, A. P.
    Buevich, A. G.
    Baglaeva, E. M.
    Shichkin, A. V.
    CATENA, 2019, 174 : 425 - 435
  • [34] Spatial Prediction of Soil Moisture Content in Winter Wheat Based on Machine Learning Model
    Nie, Hongmei
    Yang, Lianan
    Li, Xinyao
    Ren, Li
    Xu, Jinhao
    Feng, Yongtao
    2018 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOINFORMATICS (GEOINFORMATICS 2018), 2018,
  • [35] Machine learning applied for Antarctic soil mapping: Spatial prediction of soil texture for Maritime Antarctica and Northern Antarctic Peninsula
    Siqueira, Rafael G.
    Moquedace, Cassio M.
    Francelino, Marcio R.
    Schaefer, Carlos E. G. R.
    Fernandes-Filho, Elpidio I.
    GEODERMA, 2023, 432
  • [36] Identifying the primary drivers of soil erosion through machine learning: a comparative analysis of three algorithms
    Jarbais, Goldi
    Harshavardhanan, Pon
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2024, 26 (11) : 2837 - 2851
  • [37] Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms to assess soil erosion in Mediterranean farmland: A case-study in Syria
    Mohammed, Safwan
    Jouhra, Ali
    Enaruvbe, Glory O.
    Bashir, Bashar
    Barakat, Mona
    Alsilibe, Firas
    Kulimushi, Luc Cimusa
    Alsalman, Abdullah
    Szabo, Szilard
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 34 (10) : 2896 - 2911
  • [38] Soil total and organic carbon mapping and uncertainty analysis using machine learning techniques
    Zhang, Wei-chun
    Wan, He-shuang
    Zhou, Ming-hou
    Wu, Wei
    Liu, Hong -bin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 143
  • [39] Soil salinity prediction using a machine learning approach through hyperspectral satellite image
    Klibi, Salim
    Tounsi, Kais
    Ben Rebah, Zouhaier
    Solaiman, Basel
    Farah, Imed Riadh
    2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ATSIP'2020), 2020,
  • [40] Soil salinization prediction through feature selection and machine learning at the irrigation district scale
    Xie, Junbo
    Shi, Cong
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Qi
    Zhong, Zhibo
    He, Shuai
    Wang, Xingpeng
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2025, 12