Outcomes and Institutional Variation in Arterial Access Among Patients With AMI and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing PCI

被引:3
|
作者
Mahtta, Dhruv [1 ,2 ]
Manandhar, Pratik [3 ]
Wegermann, Zachary K. [3 ,4 ]
Wojdyla, Daniel [3 ,4 ]
Megaly, Michael [5 ]
Kochar, Ajar [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Virani, Salim S. [1 ,2 ]
V. Rao, Sunil [9 ]
Elgendy, Islam Y. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Div Cardiol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[5] Willis Knighton Heart Inst, Shreveport, LA USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Cardiovasc Div, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Richard & Susan Smith Ctr Outcomes Res Cardiol, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[9] NYU Langone Hlth Syst, New York, NY USA
[10] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Gill Heart & Vasc Inst, Div Cardiovasc Med, Lexington, KY USA
[11] Univ Kentucky, Gill Heart Inst, Div Cardiovasc Med, 900 South Limestone St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; bleeding; cardiogenic shock; percutaneous coronary intervention; transradial; transfemoral; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY; FEMORAL ACCESS; METAANALYSIS; SITE; MANAGEMENT; INSIGHTS; DISEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Contemporary data comparing the outcomes of transradial access (TRA) vs transfemoral access (TFA) among patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. OBJECTIVES This study examines in-hospital outcomes and institutional variation among patients with AMI-CS undergoing TRA-PCI vs TFA-PCI. METHODS Patients admitted with AMI-CS from the NCDR CathPCI registry between April 2018 and June 2021 were included. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting models were used to assess the association between access site and in-hospital outcomes. A falsification analysis using non-access site-related bleeding was performed. RESULTS Among 35,944 patients with AMI-CS undergoing PCI, 25.6% were performed with TRA. The proportion of TRA-PCI increased over the study period (22.0% in the second quarter of 2018 vs 29.1% in the second quarter of 2021; P-trend <0.001). Significant institutional-level variability in the use of TRA-PCI was also observed: 20.9% of all sites using TRA in <2% of PCIs (low utilization) vs 1.9% of all sites using TRA in >80% of PCIs (high utilization). Patients undergoing TRA-PCI had a significantly lower adjusted incidence of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% confi-dence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.76), mortality (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.69-0.78), vascular complications (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84), and new dialysis (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97). There was no difference in non-access site related bleeding (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.84-1.03). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar benefit with TRA-PCI among patients without arterial cross-over. There were no significant interactions observed between TRA-PCI with mechanical circulatory support and in -hospital outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this large nationwide contemporary analysis of patients with AMI-CS, about quarter of PCIs were performed via TRA with wide variability across US institutions. TRA-PCI was associated with significantly lower incidence of in-hospital major bleeding, mortality, vascular complications, and new dialysis. This benefit was observed irrespective of mechanical circulatory support use. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:1517-1528) Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1528
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
    Kanwar, Manreet
    Thayer, Katherine L.
    Garan, Arthur Reshad
    Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime
    Whitehead, Evan
    Mahr, Claudius
    Sinha, Shashank S.
    Vorovich, Esther
    Harwani, Neil M.
    Zweck, Elric
    Abraham, Jacob
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Kapur, Navin K.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [42] Prasugrel vs clopidogrel in cardiogenic shock patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction Results of the ISAR-SHOCK registry
    Orban, Martin
    Mayer, Katharina
    Morath, Tanja
    Bernlochner, Isabell
    Hadamitzky, Martin
    Braun, Siegmund
    Schulz, Stefanie
    Hoppmann, Petra
    Hausleiter, Joerg
    Tiroch, Klaus
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Massberg, Steffen
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Sibbing, Dirk
    Kastrati, Adnan
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2014, 112 (06) : 1190 - 1197
  • [43] One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock REPLY
    Thiele, Holger
    Schneider, Steffen
    Desch, Steffen
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (19): : 1877 - 1877
  • [44] Clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing transfer between centers in Spain
    Barrionuevo-Sanchez, M. Isabel
    Ariza-Sole, Albert
    Viana-Tejedor, Ana
    del Prado, Nayade
    Rosillo, Nicolas
    Jorge-Perez, Pablo
    Sanchez-Salado, Josecarlos
    Lorente, Victoria
    Alegre, Oriol
    Llao, Isaac
    Martin-Asenjo, Roberto
    Bernal, Jose Luis
    Fernandez-Perez, Cristina
    Corbi-Pascual, Miguel
    Pascual, Julia
    Marcos, Marta
    Cuerda, Francisco de la
    Carmona, Jesus
    Comin-Colet, Josep
    Elolad, Francisco Javier
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2024, 77 (03): : 226 - 233
  • [45] Success rate and clinical outcome of left main PCI in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock. Results of the ALKK-registry
    Zeymer, U.
    Hochadel, M.
    Hoffmeister, H. M.
    Ince, H.
    Kerber, S.
    Zahn, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 556 - 557
  • [46] OUTCOMES OF PCI IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING APPROPRIATE VERSUS UNCERTAIN PCI
    Changsirivathanathamrong, Dechaboon
    Kini, Annapoorna
    Kovacic, Jason
    Kim, Michael
    Krishnan, Prakash
    Moreno, Pedro
    Suleman, Javed
    Hasan, Choudhury
    Sharma, Samin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E1185 - E1185
  • [47] Radial Access for PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock Underused, Underappreciated?
    Claessen, Bimmer
    Peters, Elma
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (12) : 1529 - 1530
  • [48] AMI causing cardiogenic shock in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function
    Caldeira Da Rocha, R.
    Picarra, B.
    Claudio, F.
    Carrigton, M.
    Pais, J.
    Congo, K.
    Santos, A. R.
    Trinca, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 1532 - 1532
  • [49] IMPACT OF IMMEDIATE MULTIVESSEL INTERVENTION ON OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIVESSEL DISEASE UNDERGOING PRIMARY PCI FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK IN REAL LIFE
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Hochadel, Mathias
    Darius, Harald
    Brachmann, Johannes
    Hauptmann, K.
    Zahn, Ralf
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E1697 - E1697
  • [50] Systemic Arterial Pulsatility Index Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
    Stafford, Patrick
    Patel, Paras
    Bilchick, Kenneth
    Mazimba, Sula
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2019, 25 (08) : S35 - S35