Outcomes and Institutional Variation in Arterial Access Among Patients With AMI and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing PCI

被引:3
|
作者
Mahtta, Dhruv [1 ,2 ]
Manandhar, Pratik [3 ]
Wegermann, Zachary K. [3 ,4 ]
Wojdyla, Daniel [3 ,4 ]
Megaly, Michael [5 ]
Kochar, Ajar [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Virani, Salim S. [1 ,2 ]
V. Rao, Sunil [9 ]
Elgendy, Islam Y. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Div Cardiol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[5] Willis Knighton Heart Inst, Shreveport, LA USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Cardiovasc Div, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Richard & Susan Smith Ctr Outcomes Res Cardiol, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[9] NYU Langone Hlth Syst, New York, NY USA
[10] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Gill Heart & Vasc Inst, Div Cardiovasc Med, Lexington, KY USA
[11] Univ Kentucky, Gill Heart Inst, Div Cardiovasc Med, 900 South Limestone St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; bleeding; cardiogenic shock; percutaneous coronary intervention; transradial; transfemoral; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY; FEMORAL ACCESS; METAANALYSIS; SITE; MANAGEMENT; INSIGHTS; DISEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Contemporary data comparing the outcomes of transradial access (TRA) vs transfemoral access (TFA) among patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. OBJECTIVES This study examines in-hospital outcomes and institutional variation among patients with AMI-CS undergoing TRA-PCI vs TFA-PCI. METHODS Patients admitted with AMI-CS from the NCDR CathPCI registry between April 2018 and June 2021 were included. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting models were used to assess the association between access site and in-hospital outcomes. A falsification analysis using non-access site-related bleeding was performed. RESULTS Among 35,944 patients with AMI-CS undergoing PCI, 25.6% were performed with TRA. The proportion of TRA-PCI increased over the study period (22.0% in the second quarter of 2018 vs 29.1% in the second quarter of 2021; P-trend <0.001). Significant institutional-level variability in the use of TRA-PCI was also observed: 20.9% of all sites using TRA in <2% of PCIs (low utilization) vs 1.9% of all sites using TRA in >80% of PCIs (high utilization). Patients undergoing TRA-PCI had a significantly lower adjusted incidence of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% confi-dence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.76), mortality (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.69-0.78), vascular complications (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84), and new dialysis (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97). There was no difference in non-access site related bleeding (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.84-1.03). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar benefit with TRA-PCI among patients without arterial cross-over. There were no significant interactions observed between TRA-PCI with mechanical circulatory support and in -hospital outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this large nationwide contemporary analysis of patients with AMI-CS, about quarter of PCIs were performed via TRA with wide variability across US institutions. TRA-PCI was associated with significantly lower incidence of in-hospital major bleeding, mortality, vascular complications, and new dialysis. This benefit was observed irrespective of mechanical circulatory support use. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:1517-1528) Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1528
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: Is radial access feasible?
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Anderson, Simon G.
    Ratib, Karim
    Routledge, Helen
    Neyses, Ludwig
    Fraser, Douglas G.
    Buchan, Iain
    de Belder, Mark A.
    Ludman, Peter
    Nolan, Jim
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 167 (06) : 900 - U172
  • [32] Impact of access site choice on outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pancholy, Samir B.
    Shantha, Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash
    Romagnoli, Enrico
    Kedev, Sasko
    Bernat, Ivo
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Jolly, Sanjit
    Bertrand, Olivier F.
    Patel, Tejas M.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (02) : 353 - U213
  • [33] Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Admitted on Weekends Versus Weekdays
    Harhash, Ahmed A.
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Fendler, Timothy J.
    Khumri, Taiyeb M.
    Nassif, Michael E.
    Magalski, Anthony
    Sperry, Brett W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 144 : 20 - 25
  • [34] Clinical Outcomes According to ECG Presentations in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the Culprit Lesion Only PCI vs Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock Trial
    Zeitouni, Michel
    Akin, Ibrahim
    Desch, Steffen
    Barthelemy, Olivier
    Brugier, Delphine
    Collet, Jean-Philippe
    de Waha-Thiele, Suzanne
    Greenwood, John P.
    Guedeney, Paul
    Hage, Georges
    Hauguel-Moreau, Marie
    Huber, Kurt
    Kerneis, Mathieu
    Noc, Marko
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Rouanet, Stephanie
    Savonitto, Stefano
    Serpytis, Pranas
    Silvain, Johanne
    Stepinska, Janina
    Vicaut, Eric
    Vrints, Christiaan J. M.
    Windecker, Stephan
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Thiele, Holger
    Montalescot, Gilles
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (04) : 1415 - 1425
  • [35] Comparison of the prognosis among in-hospital survivors of cardiogenic shock based on etiology: AMI and Non-AMI
    Chien, Shih-Chieh
    Wang, Cheng-An
    Liu, Hung-Yi
    Lin, Chao-Feng
    Huang, Chun-Yao
    Chien, Li-Nien
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [36] Vascular Access Complications in Patients Undergoing Veno-Arterial ECMO and Their Impact on Survival in Patients With Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: A Retrospective 8-Year Study
    Singh, Vikrampal
    Singh, Gurmeet
    Arya, Rajesh Chand
    Kapoor, Samir
    Garg, Arun
    Ralhan, Sarju
    Gupta, Vivek K.
    Mohan, Bishav
    Wander, Gurpreet Singh
    Gupta, Rajiv K.
    ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 25 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [37] MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Burstein, Barry
    Tabi, Meir
    Kashani, Kianoush
    Jentzer, Jacob
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48
  • [38] Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
    Kanwar, M.
    Thayer, K. L.
    Garan, A.
    Hernandez-Montfort, J.
    Whitehead, E. H.
    Mahr, C.
    Sinha, S.
    Vorovich, E.
    Harwani, N. M.
    Zweck, E.
    Abraham, J.
    Burkhoff, D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S130 - S131
  • [39] IMMEDIATE MULTIVESSEL INTERVENTIONIN PATIENTS WITH MULTIVESSEL DISEASE UNDERGOING PRIMARY PCI FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: RESULTS OF THE PROSPECTIVE IABP-SHOCK TRIAL
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Werdan, Karl
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Thiele, Holger
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E101 - E101
  • [40] OUTCOMES OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES
    Al-Akchar, Mohammad
    Missula, Venkata
    Al-Khadra, Yasser
    Sawalha, Khalid
    Sundararajan, Tharani
    Koester, Cameron
    Bhattarai, Mukul
    Salih, Mohsin
    Chami, Youssef
    DeMartini, Tony
    Hafiz, Abdul Moiz
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 887 - 887