共 50 条
Outcomes and Institutional Variation in Arterial Access Among Patients With AMI and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing PCI
被引:3
|作者:
Mahtta, Dhruv
[1
,2
]
Manandhar, Pratik
[3
]
Wegermann, Zachary K.
[3
,4
]
Wojdyla, Daniel
[3
,4
]
Megaly, Michael
[5
]
Kochar, Ajar
[6
,7
,8
]
Virani, Salim S.
[1
,2
]
V. Rao, Sunil
[9
]
Elgendy, Islam Y.
[10
,11
]
机构:
[1] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Div Cardiol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[5] Willis Knighton Heart Inst, Shreveport, LA USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Cardiovasc Div, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Richard & Susan Smith Ctr Outcomes Res Cardiol, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[9] NYU Langone Hlth Syst, New York, NY USA
[10] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Gill Heart & Vasc Inst, Div Cardiovasc Med, Lexington, KY USA
[11] Univ Kentucky, Gill Heart Inst, Div Cardiovasc Med, 900 South Limestone St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
acute myocardial infarction;
bleeding;
cardiogenic shock;
percutaneous coronary intervention;
transradial;
transfemoral;
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY;
FEMORAL ACCESS;
METAANALYSIS;
SITE;
MANAGEMENT;
INSIGHTS;
DISEASE;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.043
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND Contemporary data comparing the outcomes of transradial access (TRA) vs transfemoral access (TFA) among patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. OBJECTIVES This study examines in-hospital outcomes and institutional variation among patients with AMI-CS undergoing TRA-PCI vs TFA-PCI. METHODS Patients admitted with AMI-CS from the NCDR CathPCI registry between April 2018 and June 2021 were included. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting models were used to assess the association between access site and in-hospital outcomes. A falsification analysis using non-access site-related bleeding was performed. RESULTS Among 35,944 patients with AMI-CS undergoing PCI, 25.6% were performed with TRA. The proportion of TRA-PCI increased over the study period (22.0% in the second quarter of 2018 vs 29.1% in the second quarter of 2021; P-trend <0.001). Significant institutional-level variability in the use of TRA-PCI was also observed: 20.9% of all sites using TRA in <2% of PCIs (low utilization) vs 1.9% of all sites using TRA in >80% of PCIs (high utilization). Patients undergoing TRA-PCI had a significantly lower adjusted incidence of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% confi-dence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.76), mortality (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.69-0.78), vascular complications (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84), and new dialysis (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97). There was no difference in non-access site related bleeding (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.84-1.03). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar benefit with TRA-PCI among patients without arterial cross-over. There were no significant interactions observed between TRA-PCI with mechanical circulatory support and in -hospital outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this large nationwide contemporary analysis of patients with AMI-CS, about quarter of PCIs were performed via TRA with wide variability across US institutions. TRA-PCI was associated with significantly lower incidence of in-hospital major bleeding, mortality, vascular complications, and new dialysis. This benefit was observed irrespective of mechanical circulatory support use. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:1517-1528) Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1528
页数:12
相关论文