Evaluation of Global-Scale and Local-Scale Optimized Segmentation Algorithms in GEOBIA With SAM on Land Use and Land Cover

被引:2
|
作者
He, Tao [1 ]
Chen, Jianyu [2 ,3 ]
Kang, Linchong [4 ]
Zhu, Qiankun [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ocean Coll, Zhoushan 316021, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 2, State Key Lab Satellite Ocean Environm Dynam, Hangzhou 310012, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Oceanog, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Marine Data & Informat Serv, Tianjin 300171, Peoples R China
关键词
Image segmentation; Optimization; Springs; Sea measurements; Deep learning; Visualization; Merging; Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA); scale optimization; segment anything model (SAM); segment evaluation; OBJECT-BASED ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MULTISCALE SEGMENTATION; PARAMETER SELECTION; SATELLITE IMAGES; MEAN SHIFT; GIS; MULTIRESOLUTION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3373385
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Segmentation is crucial in geographic object-based image analysis for accurate land use and land cover mapping. However, obtaining outstanding segmentation results in all scenarios proves challenging with a single algorithm. This study investigates seven segmentation algorithms: mean shift (MF), O Sistema de Processamento de informacoes georreferenciadas (the geographic information and image processing system) (SPRING), Estimation of scale parameter 2 (ESP2) (three global-scale algorithms), image object detection approach (IODA), SA, edge-guided image object detection approach (EIODA) (three local-scale optimization algorithms), and segment anything model (SAM) (deep learning). In the custom dataset and semantic segmentation datasets, we apply visual interpretation, unsupervised, and supervised evaluation methods with 15 test images, using a total of 17 evaluation indices to assess the segmentation results. Based on the evaluation results, the effectiveness and adaptability of the algorithms in scene segmentation are comprehensively analyzed. The results report that global-scale segmentation approaches encounter difficulties in distinguishing meaningful objects in complicated scenarios. Both MF and SPRING methods are prone to over-segmentation. In many cases, ESP2 tends to generate homogeneous segments (low weighted variance), whereas EIODA tends to produce heterogeneous adjacent segments (low Moran's I). ED3 and segmentation evaluation index demonstrate that scale parameter (SA) and IODA can to some extent identify geo-objects, with SA being more effective and performing exceptionally well in building extraction. The EIODA performs well in areas with clear boundaries, like aquaculture ponds and water-land transitions. SAM accurately detects objects of various sizes, displaying rich semantic content and high consistency with reference polygons. The average intersection over union reaches 71.10% and F measure attains 0.77 under normal conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:6721 / 6738
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local-Scale Variation in Land Use Practice Supports a Diverse Carnivore Guild on Namibian Multiple-Use Rangeland
    Verschueren, Stijn
    Briers-Louw, Willem D.
    Monterroso, Pedro
    Marker, Laurie
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 79 (01) : 64 - 76
  • [32] Evaluation of Global Land Use-Land Cover Data Products in Guangxi, China
    Hao, Xuan
    Qiu, Yubao
    Jia, Guoqiang
    Menenti, Massimo
    Ma, Jiangming
    Jiang, Zhengxin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [33] Sgformer: A Local and Global Features Coupling Network for Semantic Segmentation of Land Cover
    Weng, Liguo
    Pang, Kai
    Xia, Min
    Lin, Haifeng
    Qian, Ming
    Zhu, Changjie
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 16 : 6812 - 6824
  • [34] A review of regional and Global scale Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) mapping products generated from satellite remote sensing
    Wang, Yanzhao
    Sun, Yonghua
    Cao, Xuyue
    Wang, Yihan
    Zhang, Wangkuan
    Cheng, Xinglu
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 206 : 311 - 334
  • [35] SCALE-DEPENDENT ERRORS IN THE ESTIMATION OF LAND-COVER PROPORTIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL LAND-COVER DATASETS
    MOODY, A
    WOODCOCK, CE
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 60 (05): : 585 - 594
  • [36] The role of global-to-local linkages in land use/land cover change in South Florida
    Solecki, WD
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 37 (03) : 339 - 356
  • [37] Global heterogeneous graph convolutional network: from coarse to refined land cover and land use segmentation
    Liu, Zhi-Qiang
    Zhang, Zheng
    Meng, Yu
    Tang, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [38] Multi-Scale Feature Aggregation Network for Semantic Segmentation of Land Cover
    Shen, Xu
    Weng, Liguo
    Xia, Min
    Lin, Haifeng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [39] Synthesis of multi-scale segmentation results based on land cover categories
    Yi, Lina
    Wu, Zhaocong
    Zhang, Guifeng
    Zhang, Yiming
    REMOTE SENSING OF THE ENVIRONMENT: THE 17TH CHINA CONFERENCE ON REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 8203
  • [40] Global-Scale Shifts in Rooting Depths Due To Anthropocene Land Cover Changes Pose Unexamined Consequences for Critical Zone Functioning
    Hauser, Emma
    Sullivan, Pamela L.
    Flores, Alejandro N.
    Hirmas, Daniel
    Billings, Sharon A.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2022, 10 (11)