Evaluation of Global-Scale and Local-Scale Optimized Segmentation Algorithms in GEOBIA With SAM on Land Use and Land Cover

被引:2
|
作者
He, Tao [1 ]
Chen, Jianyu [2 ,3 ]
Kang, Linchong [4 ]
Zhu, Qiankun [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ocean Coll, Zhoushan 316021, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 2, State Key Lab Satellite Ocean Environm Dynam, Hangzhou 310012, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Oceanog, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Marine Data & Informat Serv, Tianjin 300171, Peoples R China
关键词
Image segmentation; Optimization; Springs; Sea measurements; Deep learning; Visualization; Merging; Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA); scale optimization; segment anything model (SAM); segment evaluation; OBJECT-BASED ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MULTISCALE SEGMENTATION; PARAMETER SELECTION; SATELLITE IMAGES; MEAN SHIFT; GIS; MULTIRESOLUTION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3373385
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Segmentation is crucial in geographic object-based image analysis for accurate land use and land cover mapping. However, obtaining outstanding segmentation results in all scenarios proves challenging with a single algorithm. This study investigates seven segmentation algorithms: mean shift (MF), O Sistema de Processamento de informacoes georreferenciadas (the geographic information and image processing system) (SPRING), Estimation of scale parameter 2 (ESP2) (three global-scale algorithms), image object detection approach (IODA), SA, edge-guided image object detection approach (EIODA) (three local-scale optimization algorithms), and segment anything model (SAM) (deep learning). In the custom dataset and semantic segmentation datasets, we apply visual interpretation, unsupervised, and supervised evaluation methods with 15 test images, using a total of 17 evaluation indices to assess the segmentation results. Based on the evaluation results, the effectiveness and adaptability of the algorithms in scene segmentation are comprehensively analyzed. The results report that global-scale segmentation approaches encounter difficulties in distinguishing meaningful objects in complicated scenarios. Both MF and SPRING methods are prone to over-segmentation. In many cases, ESP2 tends to generate homogeneous segments (low weighted variance), whereas EIODA tends to produce heterogeneous adjacent segments (low Moran's I). ED3 and segmentation evaluation index demonstrate that scale parameter (SA) and IODA can to some extent identify geo-objects, with SA being more effective and performing exceptionally well in building extraction. The EIODA performs well in areas with clear boundaries, like aquaculture ponds and water-land transitions. SAM accurately detects objects of various sizes, displaying rich semantic content and high consistency with reference polygons. The average intersection over union reaches 71.10% and F measure attains 0.77 under normal conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:6721 / 6738
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of land use/land cover scale on modelling urban ecosystem services
    Darren R. Grafius
    Ron Corstanje
    Philip H. Warren
    Karl L. Evans
    Steven Hancock
    Jim A. Harris
    Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31 : 1509 - 1522
  • [22] The impact of land use/land cover scale on modelling urban ecosystem services
    Grafius, Darren R.
    Corstanje, Ron
    Warren, Philip H.
    Evans, Karl L.
    Hancock, Steven
    Harris, Jim A.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2016, 31 (07) : 1509 - 1522
  • [23] Performance evaluation of MLE, RF and SVM classification algorithms for watershed scale land use/land cover mapping using sentinel 2 bands
    Rana, Vikas Kumar
    Suryanarayana, Tallavajhala Maruthi Venkata
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 19
  • [24] Evaluation of Light Gradient Boosted Machine Learning Technique in Large Scale Land Use and Land Cover Classification
    McCarty, Dakota Aaron
    Kim, Hyun Woo
    Lee, Hye Kyung
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2020, 7 (10) : 1 - 22
  • [25] Global-scale land surface hydrologic modeling with the representation of water table dynamics
    Koirala, Sujan
    Yeh, Pat J. -F.
    Hirabayashi, Yukiko
    Kanae, Shinjiro
    Oki, Taikan
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (01) : 75 - 89
  • [26] Unsupervised Image Segmentation Parameters Evaluation for Urban Land Use/Land Cover Applications
    Ikokou, Guy Blanchard
    Malale, Kate Miranda
    GEOMATICS, 2024, 4 (02): : 149 - 172
  • [27] Monitoring Land Use/Land Cover and Landscape Pattern Changes at a Local Scale: A Case Study of Pyongyang, North Korea
    Piao, Yong
    Xiao, Yi
    Ma, Fengdi
    Park, Sangjin
    Lee, Dongkun
    Mo, Yongwon
    Jeong, Seunggyu
    Hwang, Injae
    Kim, Yujin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [28] Uncertainty in forecasting land cover land use at a watershed scale: Towards enhanced sustainable land management
    Harik, G.
    Alameddine, I.
    Zurayk, R.
    El-Fadel, M.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2023, 486
  • [29] A Framework for Subregion Ensemble Learning Mapping of Land Use/Land Cover at the Watershed Scale
    Li, Runxiang
    Gao, Xiaohong
    Shi, Feifei
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [30] Land use/land cover and scale influences on in-stream nitrogen uptake kinetics
    Covino, Tim
    McGlynn, Brian
    McNamara, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2012, 117