Evaluation of Global-Scale and Local-Scale Optimized Segmentation Algorithms in GEOBIA With SAM on Land Use and Land Cover

被引:2
|
作者
He, Tao [1 ]
Chen, Jianyu [2 ,3 ]
Kang, Linchong [4 ]
Zhu, Qiankun [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ocean Coll, Zhoushan 316021, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 2, State Key Lab Satellite Ocean Environm Dynam, Hangzhou 310012, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Oceanog, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Marine Data & Informat Serv, Tianjin 300171, Peoples R China
关键词
Image segmentation; Optimization; Springs; Sea measurements; Deep learning; Visualization; Merging; Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA); scale optimization; segment anything model (SAM); segment evaluation; OBJECT-BASED ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MULTISCALE SEGMENTATION; PARAMETER SELECTION; SATELLITE IMAGES; MEAN SHIFT; GIS; MULTIRESOLUTION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3373385
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Segmentation is crucial in geographic object-based image analysis for accurate land use and land cover mapping. However, obtaining outstanding segmentation results in all scenarios proves challenging with a single algorithm. This study investigates seven segmentation algorithms: mean shift (MF), O Sistema de Processamento de informacoes georreferenciadas (the geographic information and image processing system) (SPRING), Estimation of scale parameter 2 (ESP2) (three global-scale algorithms), image object detection approach (IODA), SA, edge-guided image object detection approach (EIODA) (three local-scale optimization algorithms), and segment anything model (SAM) (deep learning). In the custom dataset and semantic segmentation datasets, we apply visual interpretation, unsupervised, and supervised evaluation methods with 15 test images, using a total of 17 evaluation indices to assess the segmentation results. Based on the evaluation results, the effectiveness and adaptability of the algorithms in scene segmentation are comprehensively analyzed. The results report that global-scale segmentation approaches encounter difficulties in distinguishing meaningful objects in complicated scenarios. Both MF and SPRING methods are prone to over-segmentation. In many cases, ESP2 tends to generate homogeneous segments (low weighted variance), whereas EIODA tends to produce heterogeneous adjacent segments (low Moran's I). ED3 and segmentation evaluation index demonstrate that scale parameter (SA) and IODA can to some extent identify geo-objects, with SA being more effective and performing exceptionally well in building extraction. The EIODA performs well in areas with clear boundaries, like aquaculture ponds and water-land transitions. SAM accurately detects objects of various sizes, displaying rich semantic content and high consistency with reference polygons. The average intersection over union reaches 71.10% and F measure attains 0.77 under normal conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:6721 / 6738
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land cover change or land-use intensification: simulating land system change with a global-scale land change model
    Van Asselen, Sanneke
    Verburg, Peter H.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (12) : 3648 - 3667
  • [2] Hotspots of uncertainty in land-use and land-cover change projections: a global-scale model comparison
    Prestele, Reinhard
    Alexander, Peter
    Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
    Arneth, Almut
    Calvin, Katherine
    Doelman, Jonathan
    Eitelberg, David A.
    Engstrom, Kerstin
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Havlik, Petr
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Jain, Atul K.
    Krisztin, Tamas
    Kyle, Page
    Meiyappan, Prasanth
    Popp, Alexander
    Sands, Ronald D.
    Schaldach, Ruediger
    Schuengel, Jan
    Stehfest, Elke
    Tabeau, Andrzej
    Van Meijl, Hans
    Van Vliet, Jasper
    Verburg, Peter H.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (12) : 3967 - 3983
  • [3] NDVI-DERIVED LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATIONS AT A GLOBAL-SCALE
    DEFRIES, RS
    TOWNSHEND, JRG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 15 (17) : 3567 - 3586
  • [4] Role of the research standpoint in integrating global-scale and local-scale research
    Malone, EL
    Rayner, S
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2001, 19 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [5] GLOBAL-SCALE, LOCAL-SCALE, AND INTERMEDIATE-SCALE STRUCTURES IN PROTOTYPE SPIRAL GALAXIES
    ROBERTS, WW
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 1993, 105 (688) : 670 - 673
  • [6] Acoustic indices are responsive to local-scale but not landscape-scale agricultural land use
    Quinn, John E.
    Pederson, Calla
    Vickery, Caroline E.
    Hyland, Emilia
    Eckberg, James O.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 160
  • [7] Contextualizing local-scale point sample data using global-scale spatial datasets: Lessons learnt from the analysis of large-scale land acquisitions
    Eckert, Sandra
    Giger, Markus
    Messerli, Peter
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 68 : 84 - 94
  • [8] Analyses of Nocturnal Temperature Cooling-Rate Response to Historical Local-Scale Urban Land-Use/Land Cover Change
    Chow, Winston T. L.
    Svoma, Bohumil M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2011, 50 (09) : 1872 - 1883
  • [9] Towards monitoring land-cover and land-use changes at a global scale: The Global Land Survey 2005
    Gutman, G.
    Byrnes, R.
    Masek, J.
    Covington, S.
    Justice, C.
    Franks, S.
    Headley, R.
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 74 (01): : 6 - 10
  • [10] Global-Scale Comparison of MISR and MODIS Land Surface Albedos
    Pinty, Bernard
    Taberner, Malcolm
    Haemmerle, Vance R.
    Paradise, Susan R.
    Vermote, Eric
    Verstraete, Michel M.
    Gobron, Nadine
    Widlowski, Jean-Luc
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (03) : 732 - 749