Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is the End of the T-Tube Drainage Era in Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones Is Coming? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yin, Zi
    Xu, Kang
    Sun, Jian
    Zhang, Jianlong
    Xiao, Zhiyu
    Wang, Jie
    Niu, Haitao
    Zhao, Qiang
    Lin, Shangxiong
    Li, Yajie
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (01) : 54 - 66
  • [32] Ursodeoxycholic acid after common bile duct stones removal for prevention of recurrence A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Xun
    Yan, Xiao-Ru
    Zhang, Li-Ping
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (45)
  • [33] A Meta-analysis of endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones
    Wei, Qiang
    Liu, Hangcheng
    Fu, Yanlong
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2021,
  • [34] What Are the Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture After Bile Duct Injury Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hall, L.
    Halle-Smith, J.
    Hodson, J.
    Roberts, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [35] Risk factors for anastomotic stricture after hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injury-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Halle-Smith, James M.
    Hall, Lewis A.
    Mirza, Darius F.
    Roberts, Keith J.
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (05) : 1310 - 1316
  • [36] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Jisheng
    Tu, Shuju
    Yang, Zhengjiang
    Fu, Xiaowei
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Weidong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (04): : 1522 - 1533
  • [37] Laparoscopic Transcystic Versus Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shahin Hajibandeh
    Shahab Hajibandeh
    Diwakar Ryali Sarma
    Sankar Balakrishnan
    Mokhtar Eltair
    Rajnish Mankotia
    Misra Budhoo
    Yogesh Kumar
    World Journal of Surgery, 2019, 43 : 1935 - 1948
  • [38] Laparoscopic Transcystic Versus Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Sarma, Diwakar Ryali
    Balakrishnan, Sankar
    Eltair, Mokhtar
    Mankotia, Rajnish
    Budhoo, Misra
    Kumar, Yogesh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (08) : 1935 - 1948
  • [39] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jisheng Zhu
    Shuju Tu
    Zhengjiang Yang
    Xiaowei Fu
    Yong Li
    Weidong Xiao
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1522 - 1533
  • [40] Risk Factors for Recurrent Intussusception in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ye, Xiaohua
    Tang, Rong
    Chen, Shangqin
    Lin, Zhenlang
    Zhu, Jianghu
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2019, 7