Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones
    Gurusamy, K.
    Sahay, S. J.
    Burroughs, A. K.
    Davidson, B. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (07) : 908 - 916
  • [22] THE ROLE OF THE ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON DILATION OF THE MAJOR PAPILLA IN MANAGING COMMON BILE DUCT STONES: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Matsubayashi, Carolina O.
    Bernardo, Wanderlei M.
    De Marco, Michele O.
    Resende, Ricardo H.
    Rezende, Daniel T.
    Mota, Raquel Cristina L.
    Brunaldi, Vitor O.
    Luz, Gustavo O.
    Franzini, Tomazo
    de Moura, Eduardo G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB225 - AB226
  • [23] Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lei, Caining
    Lu, Tingting
    Yang, Wenwen
    Yang, Man
    Tian, Hongwei
    Song, Shaoming
    Gong, Shiyi
    Yang, Jia
    Jiang, Wenjie
    Yang, Kehu
    Guo, Tiankang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (11): : 5918 - 5935
  • [24] Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Caining Lei
    Tingting Lu
    Wenwen Yang
    Man Yang
    Hongwei Tian
    Shaoming Song
    Shiyi Gong
    Jia Yang
    Wenjie Jiang
    Kehu Yang
    Tiankang Guo
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 5918 - 5935
  • [25] Advances in Risk Factors for Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones
    Wu, Yao
    Xu, Chen Jing
    Xu, Shun Fu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 18 (04): : 1067 - 1074
  • [26] Common bile duct stones: management based on risk factors
    Hernandez, Joseraul
    Hidalgo, Carlos
    Ramirez, Ectorjaime
    Chavez, Gabriela
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 898 - 898
  • [27] The efficacy of peroral cholangioscopy for difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Korrapati, Praneet
    Ciolino, Jody
    Wani, Sachin
    Shah, Janak
    Watson, Rabindra
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Klapman, Jason
    Komanduri, Srinadh
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (03) : E263 - E275
  • [28] Clinical Impact of Common Bile Duct Angulation on the Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stone: A Meta-analysis and Review
    Ryu, Seongyul
    Jo, Ik Hyun
    Kim, Seonhoo
    Kim, Yeon-Ji
    Chung, Woo Chul
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 76 (04): : 199 - 205
  • [29] Genetic polymorphisms as prognostic factors for recurrent kidney stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Atmoko, Widi
    Raharja, Putu Angga Risky
    Birowo, Ponco
    Hamid, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy
    Taher, Akmal
    Rasyid, Nur
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [30] Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Endoscopic Methods to Manage Large Common Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Lyu, Yunxiao
    Cheng, Yunxiao
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Sicong
    Chen, Liang
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (04): : 443 - 454