Development and evaluation of measures to assess self-determination in peripartum contraceptive decision-making

被引:1
|
作者
Sznajder, Katharine [1 ]
Thaler, Katrina [1 ]
Perin, Jamie [2 ]
Burke, Anne E. [1 ,3 ]
Williams, Geoffrey C. [4 ]
Sufrin, Carolyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Bayview Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Rochester Med Ctr, Ctr Community Hlth & Prevent, Dept Med Psychol & Psychiat, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Contraceptive counseling; Instrument development; Person -centered care; Self -Determination Theory; REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY; SUPPORTING AUTONOMY; FIT INDEXES; HEALTH; PREFERENCES; EXPERIENCES; COMPETENCE; WOMEN; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110329
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to adapt and validate person-centered measures to evaluate various contributors to self-determination in perinatal contraceptive decision-making. Study design: We developed and administered four scales adapted from existing measures in the context of Self-Determination Theory: the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ), Perceived Competence Scale, modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire, and Important Other Climate Questionnaire. The TSRQ consists of three subscales: autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation. We recruited a nonprobability convenience sample of 300 hospitalized postpartum patients in Baltimore, MD, between 2015 and 2016 and administered surveys in English and Spanish. We validated the scales with Cronbach's alpha coefficients, confirmatory factor analysis, and invariance analysis. We examined construct validity by testing correlations between the scales and other person-centered measures, such as satisfaction with counseling. Results: Cronbach's alpha was > 0.8 except for the amotivation subscale. Confirmatory factor analysis was adequate for all scales. Autonomous motivation correlated positively and significantly with perceived competence, health care provider autonomy support, important other autonomy support, and other measures of patient satisfaction. Conclusions: We found the four scales to be internally consistent and valid except for the amotivation subscale. We recommend using the autonomous motivation subscale in place of the full TSRQ. The autonomous motivation subscale, Perceived Competence Scale, modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire, and Important Other Climate Questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency, construct validity, and adherence to the expected conceptual structure of the scales. Implications: Autonomous decision-making is central to ethics and quality of care, especially for contraceptive methods that require a provider for initiation or discontinuation and at more vulnerable times, such as postpartum and postabortion. These scales may help tailor person-centered and autonomy-supportive interventions and programs to improve contraceptive counseling and care delivery. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of Self-Determination
    Imamudin
    Budiman, Nandang
    Suherman
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND PEDAGOGY: DIVERSITY IN EDUCATION (ICEPP 2019), 2020, 399 : 118 - 120
  • [32] Enhancing shared decision-making in contraceptive consultations
    Lucke, Jayne C.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2017, 43 (02): : 126 - 127
  • [33] Evaluation and selection of decision-making methods to assess landfill mining projects
    Hermann, Robert
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    Vorbach, Stefan
    Ragossnig, Arne
    Pomberger, Roland
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2015, 33 (09) : 822 - 832
  • [34] The development of decision-making
    Byrnes, JP
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2002, 31 (06) : 208 - 215
  • [35] Adapting the AIR Self-Determination and Promotion of Autonomous Decision-Making Scales: An Exploratory Study Among Young Adults with Disabilities
    Taub, Tamar
    Werner, Shirli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [36] Development and evaluation of decision-making model for stock markets
    Nenortaite, Jovita
    Simutis, Rimvydas
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 36 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [37] SUBJECTIVE MEASURES AND CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING
    DELITTO, A
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1989, 69 (07): : 585 - 589
  • [38] Development and Evaluation of Decision-Making Model for Stock Markets
    Jovita Nenortaite
    Rimvydas Simutis
    Journal of Global Optimization, 2006, 36 : 1 - 19
  • [39] Sounds of silence: AAC users' experiences of self-determination and autonomous decision making
    Taub, Tamar
    Werner, Shirli
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1267 - 1267
  • [40] Psychometric Study of Two Decision-Making Measures: The Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire versus the General Decision-Making Style Questionnaire
    Aluja, Anton
    Balada, Ferran
    Garcia, Oscar
    Garcia, Luis F.
    PSYCHIATRY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 5 (03): : 503 - 514