Development and evaluation of measures to assess self-determination in peripartum contraceptive decision-making

被引:1
|
作者
Sznajder, Katharine [1 ]
Thaler, Katrina [1 ]
Perin, Jamie [2 ]
Burke, Anne E. [1 ,3 ]
Williams, Geoffrey C. [4 ]
Sufrin, Carolyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Bayview Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Rochester Med Ctr, Ctr Community Hlth & Prevent, Dept Med Psychol & Psychiat, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Contraceptive counseling; Instrument development; Person -centered care; Self -Determination Theory; REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY; SUPPORTING AUTONOMY; FIT INDEXES; HEALTH; PREFERENCES; EXPERIENCES; COMPETENCE; WOMEN; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110329
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to adapt and validate person-centered measures to evaluate various contributors to self-determination in perinatal contraceptive decision-making. Study design: We developed and administered four scales adapted from existing measures in the context of Self-Determination Theory: the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ), Perceived Competence Scale, modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire, and Important Other Climate Questionnaire. The TSRQ consists of three subscales: autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation. We recruited a nonprobability convenience sample of 300 hospitalized postpartum patients in Baltimore, MD, between 2015 and 2016 and administered surveys in English and Spanish. We validated the scales with Cronbach's alpha coefficients, confirmatory factor analysis, and invariance analysis. We examined construct validity by testing correlations between the scales and other person-centered measures, such as satisfaction with counseling. Results: Cronbach's alpha was > 0.8 except for the amotivation subscale. Confirmatory factor analysis was adequate for all scales. Autonomous motivation correlated positively and significantly with perceived competence, health care provider autonomy support, important other autonomy support, and other measures of patient satisfaction. Conclusions: We found the four scales to be internally consistent and valid except for the amotivation subscale. We recommend using the autonomous motivation subscale in place of the full TSRQ. The autonomous motivation subscale, Perceived Competence Scale, modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire, and Important Other Climate Questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency, construct validity, and adherence to the expected conceptual structure of the scales. Implications: Autonomous decision-making is central to ethics and quality of care, especially for contraceptive methods that require a provider for initiation or discontinuation and at more vulnerable times, such as postpartum and postabortion. These scales may help tailor person-centered and autonomy-supportive interventions and programs to improve contraceptive counseling and care delivery. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contraceptive decision-making in military women
    Chung-Park, Min S.
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2007, 20 (03) : 281 - 287
  • [22] Patient-centred decision-making? Biocitizens between evidence-based medicine and self-determination
    Jorgensen, Marianne Winther
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2015, 11 (03): : 311 - 329
  • [23] FACING REDUCED DECISION-MAKING CAPACITY IN HEALTH-CARE - METHODS FOR MAINTAINING CLIENT SELF-DETERMINATION
    NICHOLSON, BL
    MATROSS, GN
    SOCIAL WORK, 1989, 34 (03) : 234 - 238
  • [24] Autism and Self-Determination: Factor Analysis of Two Measures of Self-Determination
    Chou, Yu-Chi
    Wehmeyer, Michael L.
    Shogren, Karrie A.
    Palmer, Susan B.
    Lee, Jaehoon
    FOCUS ON AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2017, 32 (03) : 163 - 175
  • [25] THE DEVELOPMENT AND TRIALS OF A DECISION-MAKING MODEL - AN EVALUATION
    PETERS, M
    MARSHALL, J
    SHAW, R
    EVALUATION REVIEW, 1986, 10 (01) : 5 - 27
  • [26] Autonomous vehicles decision-making enhancement using self-determination theory and mixed-precision neural networks
    Ali, Mohammed Hasan
    Jaber, Mustafa Musa
    Alfred Daniel, J.
    Vignesh, C. Chandru
    Meenakshisundaram, Iyapparaja
    Kumar, B. Santhosh
    Punitha, P.
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023,
  • [27] Contraceptive decision-making and women with learning disabilities
    Ledger, Susan
    Earle, Sarah
    Tilley, Elizabeth
    Walmsley, Jan
    SEXUALITIES, 2016, 19 (5-6) : 698 - 724
  • [28] HUSBAND AND WIFE DISAGREEMENTS IN CONTRACEPTIVE DECISION-MAKING
    SEVERY, LJ
    POPULATION INDEX, 1984, 50 (03) : 407 - 407
  • [29] CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN ADOLESCENCE - A DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE
    ROGEL, MJ
    ZUEHLKE, ME
    PETERSEN, AC
    TOBINRICHARDS, M
    SHELTON, M
    JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 1980, 9 (06) : 491 - 506
  • [30] CROSS-CULTURAL CONTRACEPTIVE DECISION-MAKING
    CHANDRA, S
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 15 (02) : 254 - 254