Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy

被引:3
|
作者
Halthore, Aditya [1 ,2 ]
Fellows, Zachary [2 ]
Tran, Anh [2 ]
Deville, Curtiland, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Jean L. [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, Jeffrey [1 ]
Li, Heng [1 ,2 ]
Sheikh, Khadija [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Sci, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Proton Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
proton; spatial fractionation; GRID; bulky tumors; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-22-00028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy. Materials and Methods: PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. GRID targets were arranged along the long axis of the gross tumor, spaced 2 and 3 cm apart, and treated with a prescription of 18 Gy. PBS plans used 2- to 3-beam multiple-field optimization with robustness evaluation. Dosimetric parameters including peak-to-edge ratio (PEDR), ratio of dose to 90% of the valley to dose to 10% of the peak VPDR(D90/D10), and volume of normal tissue receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) were calculated. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), VPDR(D90/D10), and organ-at-risk doses were prospectively assessed in 2 patients undergoing PBS-GRID with pretreatment quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans. Results: PBS and VMAT GRID plans were generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. Gross tumor volume values ranged from 826 to 1468 cm3. Peak-to-edge ratio for PBS was higher than for VMAT for both spacing scenarios (2-cm spacing, P =.02; 3-cm spacing, P =.01). VPDR(D90/D10) for PBS was higher than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.004; 3-cm spacing, P =.002). Normal tissue V5 was lower for PBS than for VMAT (2cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Normal tissue mean dose was lower with PBS than with VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Two patients treated using PBS GRID and assessed with pretreatment QACT scans demonstrated robust PVDR, VPDR(D90/D10), and organs-at-risk doses. Conclusions: The PEDR was significantly higher for PBS than VMAT plans, indicating lower target edge dose. Normal tissue mean dose was significantly lower with PBS than VMAT. PBS GRID may result in lower normal tissue dose compared with VMAT plans, allowing for further dose escalation in patients with bulky disease.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EUROPEAN CLINICAL PRACTICE IN PENCIL BEAM SCANNING PROTON THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC POSTERIOR FOSSA TUMORS
    Toussaint, Laura
    Matysiak, Witold
    Alapetite, Claire
    Aristu, Javier
    Bannink-Gawryszuk, Agata
    Bolle, Stephanie
    Calvo, Felipe
    Campoo, Fernando Cerron
    Charlwood, Frances
    Demoor-Goldschmidt, Charlotte
    Doyen, Jerome
    Drosik-Rutowicz, Katarzyna
    Dutheil, Pauline
    Embring, Anna
    Engellau, Jacob
    Goedgebeur, Anneleen
    Goudjil, Farid
    Harrabi, Semi
    Kopec, Renata
    Kristensen, Ingrid
    Laengsdmand, Peter
    Lutgendorf-Caucig, Carola
    Meijers, Arturs
    Mirandola, Alfredo
    Muren, Ludvig
    Ondrova, Barbora
    Orlandi, Ester
    Pettersson, Erik
    Plaude, Sandija
    Righetto, Roberto
    Rombi, Barbara
    Timmermann, Beate
    Van Beek, Karen
    Vennarini, Sabina
    Vestergaard, Anne
    Vidal, Marie
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Weber, Damien
    Whitfield, Gillian
    Zimmerman, Jens
    Maduro, John
    Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2023, 70 : S25 - S26
  • [42] Clinical Outcomes of Children with Primary Brain Tumors Treated with Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Tran, S.
    Bojaxhiu, B.
    Lim, P.
    Kliebsch, U.
    Bachtiary, B.
    Walser, M.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Pica, A.
    Weber, D. C.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2019, 66 : S197 - S197
  • [43] A Promo from PROMO prospective registry (Pencil beam scanning Proton therapy for Moving tumors)
    Chilukuri, S.
    Sundar, S.
    Mathews, A.
    Patro, K.
    Reddy, A.
    Sharma, D.
    Nangia, S.
    Jalali, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1229 - S1230
  • [44] Hearing in cancer patients with skull base tumors undergoing pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Bachtiary, B.
    Veraguth, D.
    Roos, N.
    von Felten, S.
    Weber, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S744 - S745
  • [45] Spatially fractionated (GRID) radiation therapy using proton pencil beam scanning (PBS): Feasibility study and clinical implementation
    Gao, M.
    Mohiuddin, M. M.
    Hartsell, W. F.
    Pankuch, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1645 - 1653
  • [46] Evaluation of monte carlo to support commissioning of the treatment planning system of new pencil beam scanning proton therapy facilities
    Botnariuc, D.
    Court, S.
    Lourenco, A.
    Gosling, A.
    Royle, G.
    Hussein, M.
    Rompokos, V
    Veiga, C.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (04):
  • [47] Feasibility of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Treatment Planning with a Dynamic Collimation System in an FDA-Cleared TPS
    Bennett, L.
    Smith, B.
    Flynn, R.
    Hyer, D.
    Wang, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E101 - E101
  • [48] Endoscopic Resection Followed by Proton Beam Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Tumors of the Skull Base
    Leeman, J. E.
    Lee, N.
    Zhou, Y.
    Sine, K.
    Tabar, V. S.
    Cohen, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (05): : 1348 - 1348
  • [49] Determination of surface dose in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Kern, A.
    Baeumer, C.
    Kroeninger, K.
    Mertens, L.
    Timmermann, B.
    Walbersloh, J.
    Wulff, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S483 - S483
  • [50] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma
    Ares, Carmen
    Albertini, Francesca
    Frei-Welte, Martina
    Bolsi, Alessandra
    Grotzer, Michael A.
    Goitein, Gudrun
    Weber, Damien C.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 128 (01) : 137 - 145