Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy

被引:3
|
作者
Halthore, Aditya [1 ,2 ]
Fellows, Zachary [2 ]
Tran, Anh [2 ]
Deville, Curtiland, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Jean L. [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, Jeffrey [1 ]
Li, Heng [1 ,2 ]
Sheikh, Khadija [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Sci, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Proton Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
proton; spatial fractionation; GRID; bulky tumors; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-22-00028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy. Materials and Methods: PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. GRID targets were arranged along the long axis of the gross tumor, spaced 2 and 3 cm apart, and treated with a prescription of 18 Gy. PBS plans used 2- to 3-beam multiple-field optimization with robustness evaluation. Dosimetric parameters including peak-to-edge ratio (PEDR), ratio of dose to 90% of the valley to dose to 10% of the peak VPDR(D90/D10), and volume of normal tissue receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) were calculated. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), VPDR(D90/D10), and organ-at-risk doses were prospectively assessed in 2 patients undergoing PBS-GRID with pretreatment quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans. Results: PBS and VMAT GRID plans were generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. Gross tumor volume values ranged from 826 to 1468 cm3. Peak-to-edge ratio for PBS was higher than for VMAT for both spacing scenarios (2-cm spacing, P =.02; 3-cm spacing, P =.01). VPDR(D90/D10) for PBS was higher than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.004; 3-cm spacing, P =.002). Normal tissue V5 was lower for PBS than for VMAT (2cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Normal tissue mean dose was lower with PBS than with VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Two patients treated using PBS GRID and assessed with pretreatment QACT scans demonstrated robust PVDR, VPDR(D90/D10), and organs-at-risk doses. Conclusions: The PEDR was significantly higher for PBS than VMAT plans, indicating lower target edge dose. Normal tissue mean dose was significantly lower with PBS than VMAT. PBS GRID may result in lower normal tissue dose compared with VMAT plans, allowing for further dose escalation in patients with bulky disease.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robust Evaluation of Treatment Planning Techniques in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Cranio-Spinal Irradiation
    Rana, S.
    Romaguera, T.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Bennouna, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2866 - 2867
  • [32] Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for the treatment of glomus jugulare tumours
    Kubes, Jiri
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Andrlik, Michal
    Navratil, Matej
    Slavikova, Silvia
    Klika, Daniel
    Haas, Alexandra
    Dedeckova, Katerina
    Kopeckova, Katerina
    Ondrova, Barbora
    Rotnaglova, Eliska
    Vinakurau, Stepan
    Grebenyuk, Alexander
    Rosina, Jozef
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2022, 69 (04) : 456 - 462
  • [33] Evaluation of a Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Dose Model for a Commercial Treatment Planning System
    Patel, D.
    Poenisch, F.
    Sahoo, N.
    Zhu, X.
    Gillin, M.
    Janson, M.
    Mohan, R.
    Titt, U.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E261 - E261
  • [34] A Robust Treatment Planning Technique for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Cranial Spinal Irradiation
    Zhu, M.
    Yam, M.
    Mehta, M.
    Badiyan, S.
    Young, K.
    Malyapa, R.
    Regine, W.
    Langen, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3505 - 3505
  • [35] Robustness of the Voluntary Breath-Hold Approach for the Treatment of Peripheral Lung Tumors Using Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Dueck, Jenny
    Knopf, Antje-Christin
    Lomax, Antony
    Albertini, Francesca
    Persson, Gitte F.
    Josipovic, Mirjana
    Aznar, Marianne
    Weber, Damien C.
    af Rosenschold, Per Munck
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 534 - 541
  • [36] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer
    Apinorasethkul, Ontida
    Kirk, Maura
    Teo, Kevin
    Swisher-McClure, Samuel
    Lukens, John N.
    Lin, Alexander
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [37] A beam angle optimization technique for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning of lower pelvis targets
    Kiely, J. Blanco
    White, B. M.
    Both, S.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 : 479 - 482
  • [38] Beam-specific planning target volumes incorporating 4D CT for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of thoracic tumors
    Lin, Liyong
    Kang, Minglei
    Huang, Sheng
    Mayer, Rulon
    Thomas, Andrew
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    McDonough, Jame E.
    Simone, Charles B., II
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (06): : 281 - 292
  • [39] Radiation Necrosis in Pediatric Patients with Brain Tumors Treated with Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Bojaxhiu, B.
    Ahlhelm, F.
    Walser, M.
    Placidi, L.
    Kliebsch, U.
    Mikroutsikos, L.
    Morach, P.
    Bolsi, A.
    Tony, L.
    Schneider, R.
    Weber, D. C.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2017, 64 : S330 - S331
  • [40] Conformal Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Delivery of Flank Radiation in Children with Renal Tumors
    Hill-Kayser, C. E.
    Vogel, J.
    Li, Y.
    Lustig, R. A.
    Kurtz, G.
    LaRiviere, M. J.
    Cummings, E. R.
    Mattei, P.
    Balamuth, N.
    Bagatell, R.
    MacFarland, S.
    Evageliou, N.
    Tochner, Z. A.
    Balis, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : S71 - S72