Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates

被引:1
|
作者
Oh, Na Eun [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sehee [3 ]
Lee, Habeen [4 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Transplantation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; MILAN CRITERIA; CT; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10014-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, comparing liver transplant candidates (LT group) with patients who underwent surgical resection (SR group), and to determine significant clinical factors for diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018.MethodsPatients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and subsequent SR or LT for HCC were retrospectively included between January 2019 and December 2020. The sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS LR-5 for HCC were compared between the two groups using generalized estimating equations. The accuracy of patient allocation according to the Milan criteria was calculated for the LT group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors associated with the sensitivity of LI-RADS.ResultsOf the 281 patients, 237 were assigned to the SR group, and 44 were assigned to the LT group. The LT group showed significantly lower per-patient (48.5% vs. 79.6%, p < .001) and per-lesion sensitivity (31.0% vs. 75.9%, p < .001) than the SR group, whereas no significant difference in both per-patient (100.0% vs. 91.7%, p > .99) and per-lesion specificities (100.0% vs. 94.1%, p > .99). The accuracy of patient allocation was 50.0%. Sensitivity was significantly lower in patients with a smaller lesion size (p < .001), a larger lesion number (p = .002), and a higher Child-Pugh score (p = .009).ConclusionLI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI might be insufficient in liver transplant candidates and other diagnostic imaging tests should be considered in patients with these significant clinical factors.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chen, Ningxin
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 15 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [32] Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease
    Cao, Jennie
    Shon, Andy
    Yoon, Luke
    Kamaya, Aya
    Tse, Justin R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (12) : 7622 - 7631
  • [33] Effect of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Koo, Boyeon
    Choi, Se Jin
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Heo, Subin
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [34] New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI
    Zhou, Jinhui
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Jing
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Jiang, Hang
    Zhang, Linqi
    Zhong, Xi
    Zhang, Tianhui
    Chen, Lichun
    Wang, Yufeng
    Xu, Yikai
    Wang, Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181
  • [35] Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Wolfson, Tanya
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Onohara, Kojiro
    Shimizu, Tatsuya
    Omiya, Yoshie
    Sugiyama, Hiroki
    Okumura, Akihiro
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (08) : 2557 - 2569
  • [36] Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Shintaro Ichikawa
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Guilherme Moura Cunha
    Tanya Wolfson
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Hiroyuki Morisaka
    Kojiro Onohara
    Tatsuya Shimizu
    Yoshie Omiya
    Hiroki Sugiyama
    Akihiro Okumura
    Hiroshi Onishi
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2557 - 2569
  • [37] Targetoid hepatic observations on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using LI-RADS version 2018: emphasis on hepatocellular carcinomas assigned to the LR-M category
    Park, H. J.
    Kim, Y. K.
    Cha, D., I
    Ko, S. E.
    Kim, S.
    Lee, E. S.
    Ahn, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (06) : 478.e13 - 478.e23
  • [38] Benign nodules mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 21 (02) : 187 - 191
  • [39] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Sun Kyung Jeon
    Ijin Joo
    Dong Ho Lee
    Sang Min Lee
    Hyo-Jin Kang
    Kyoung-Bun Lee
    Jeong Min Lee
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 373 - 382
  • [40] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Kyoung-Bun
    Lee, Jeong Min
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 373 - 382