Effect of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Dong Hwan [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Koo, Boyeon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Choi, Se Jin [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Heo, Subin [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Liver neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnosis; Prognosis; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; ACID;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-025-11418-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the performance of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) with LI-RADS (LI-RADS + AFP) on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) <= 3.0 cm and predicting post-surgical patient outcomes, compared to LI-RADS v2018. Methods Patients with hepatic observations <= 3.0 cm who underwent preoperative gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. In LI-RADS + AFP, LR-4 (probably-HCC), LR-M (probably or definitely-malignant but not HCC specific), or LR-TIV (definite-tumor-in-vein) by LI-RADS v2018 was upgraded to LR-5 (definitely-HCC) if they met AFP criteria based on three different cut-offs (>= 20, >= 200, >= 400 ng/mL). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 and LI-RADS + AFP LR-5 were compared using generalized estimating equations. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) of LI-RADS v2018 and LI-RADS + AFP were compared using log-rank tests. Results In 520 observations from 414 patients (mean age, 60 +/- 9 years; 328 men), LI-RADS + AFP >= 20 ng/mL (LI-RADS + AFP20) showed the highest accuracy among the three cut-offs. Compared to LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC (79.9% [95% confidence interval, 75.7-83.6] vs. 71.8% [67.2-76.1], p < 0.001) and accuracy (82.7% [79.2-85.9] vs. 76.9% [73.1-80.5], p < 0.001) without difference in specificity (93.5% [87.1-97.4] vs. 96.3% [90.8-99.0], p = 0.083). Unlike LI-RADS v2018, showing no difference in RFS between LR-4/5 and LR-M (50.6 vs. 42.6 months; p = 0.078), LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significant differences in RFS (50.6 vs. 35.0 months; p < 0.001) and OS (67.6 vs. 54.8 months, p = 0.008). Conclusion Combining AFP and LI-RADS v2018 resulted in better diagnostic performance and superior post-surgical prognostication compared to LI-RADS v2018 alone.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI to modify final LI-RADS category
    Boatright, Christine
    Peterson, Jessica
    Williams, Vanessa L.
    Best, Shaun
    Ash, Ryan
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (10) : 3136 - 3143
  • [2] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI to modify final LI-RADS category
    Christine Boatright
    Jessica Peterson
    Vanessa L. Williams
    Shaun Best
    Ryan Ash
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 3136 - 3143
  • [3] LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium enhanced MRI
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (03) : 655 - 663
  • [4] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10–19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Sidong Xie
    Yao Zhang
    Jingbiao Chen
    Ting Jiang
    Weimin Liu
    Dailin Rong
    Lin Sun
    Linqi Zhang
    Bingjun He
    Jin Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 596 - 607
  • [5] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Xie, Sidong
    Zhang, Yao
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Jiang, Ting
    Liu, Weimin
    Rong, Dailin
    Sun, Lin
    Zhang, Linqi
    He, Bingjun
    Wang, Jin
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (02) : 596 - 607
  • [6] Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study
    Rong, Dailin
    He, Bingjun
    Tang, Wenjie
    Xie, Sidong
    Kuang, Sichi
    Grazioli, Luigi
    Hussain, Shahid M.
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Jin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 687 - 698
  • [7] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Na Eun Oh
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Sehee Kim
    Habeen Lee
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 465 - 474
  • [8] Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging
    Yao, Shan
    Wei, Yi
    Ye, Zheng
    Chen, Jie
    Duan, Ting
    Zhang, Zhen
    Song, Bin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 59 (06) : 2060 - 2070
  • [9] How to utilize LR-M features of the LI-RADS to improve the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI?
    Lee, Hong Seon
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    An, Chansik
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05) : 2408 - 2416
  • [10] How to utilize LR-M features of the LI-RADS to improve the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI?
    Hong Seon Lee
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    Chansik An
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 2408 - 2416