Effect of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Dong Hwan [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Koo, Boyeon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Choi, Se Jin [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Heo, Subin [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Liver neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnosis; Prognosis; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; ACID;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-025-11418-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the performance of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) with LI-RADS (LI-RADS + AFP) on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) <= 3.0 cm and predicting post-surgical patient outcomes, compared to LI-RADS v2018. Methods Patients with hepatic observations <= 3.0 cm who underwent preoperative gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. In LI-RADS + AFP, LR-4 (probably-HCC), LR-M (probably or definitely-malignant but not HCC specific), or LR-TIV (definite-tumor-in-vein) by LI-RADS v2018 was upgraded to LR-5 (definitely-HCC) if they met AFP criteria based on three different cut-offs (>= 20, >= 200, >= 400 ng/mL). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 and LI-RADS + AFP LR-5 were compared using generalized estimating equations. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) of LI-RADS v2018 and LI-RADS + AFP were compared using log-rank tests. Results In 520 observations from 414 patients (mean age, 60 +/- 9 years; 328 men), LI-RADS + AFP >= 20 ng/mL (LI-RADS + AFP20) showed the highest accuracy among the three cut-offs. Compared to LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC (79.9% [95% confidence interval, 75.7-83.6] vs. 71.8% [67.2-76.1], p < 0.001) and accuracy (82.7% [79.2-85.9] vs. 76.9% [73.1-80.5], p < 0.001) without difference in specificity (93.5% [87.1-97.4] vs. 96.3% [90.8-99.0], p = 0.083). Unlike LI-RADS v2018, showing no difference in RFS between LR-4/5 and LR-M (50.6 vs. 42.6 months; p = 0.078), LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significant differences in RFS (50.6 vs. 35.0 months; p < 0.001) and OS (67.6 vs. 54.8 months, p = 0.008). Conclusion Combining AFP and LI-RADS v2018 resulted in better diagnostic performance and superior post-surgical prognostication compared to LI-RADS v2018 alone.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging in LI-RADS version 2018: a strategy to improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetate disodium–enhanced MRI
    Seung-seob Kim
    Sunyoung Lee
    Heejin Bae
    Yong Eun Chung
    Jin-Young Choi
    Mi-Suk Park
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 1620 - 1629
  • [32] Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Cannella, Roberto
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Tsai, Richard
    Naeem, Muhammad
    LeBlanc, Maverick
    Salter, Amber
    Tsung, Allan
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02) : 996 - 1007
  • [33] Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Haneyeh Shahbazian
    Jason Birnbaum
    Patricia J. Burns
    Sedighe Hosseini Shabanan
    Devaraju Kanmaniraja
    John Reinus
    Ihab Kamel
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Victoria Chernyak
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 3696 - 3702
  • [34] Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Shahbazian, Haneyeh
    Birnbaum, Jason
    Burns, Patricia J.
    Shabanan, Sedighe Hosseini
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Reinus, John
    Kamel, Ihab
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (12) : 3696 - 3702
  • [36] A multivariate model based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using Li-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liu, Mao-Tong
    Zhang, Ji-Yun
    Xu, Lei
    Qu, Qi
    Lu, Meng-Tian
    Jiang, Ji-Feng
    Zhao, Xian-Ce
    Zhang, Xue-Qin
    Zhang, Tao
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2023, 128 (11): : 1333 - 1346
  • [37] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the 2017 and 2018 versions of LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI
    Ko, A.
    Park, H. J.
    Lee, E. S.
    Park, S. B.
    Kim, Y. K.
    Choi, S-Y
    Ahn, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (04) : 319.e1 - 319.e9
  • [38] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: Reliability and agreement for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional treatment response
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
    Ekladious, Mena E. Y.
    Badran, Ethar M.
    Madkour, Sherihan S.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (11) : 524 - 534
  • [39] Diagnostic model using LI-RADS v2018 for predicting early recurrence of microvascular invasion-negative solitary hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Han, Xiaorui
    Zhou, Tingwen
    Xiao, Chuyin
    Shi, Changzheng
    Wei, Xinhua
    Wu, Hongzhen
    CANCER IMAGING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [40] LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to improve the diagnostic performance of small hapatocellular carcinoma (=20 mm)
    Lyu, Rong
    Hu, Weijuan
    Wang, Di
    Wang, Jiao
    Gao, Zhongsong
    Jia, Kefeng
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (06) : 1987 - 1994