Systematic adjustment of root dimensions to cusp size in aortic valve repair: a computer simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Marom, Gil [1 ]
Weltert, Luca Paolo [2 ,3 ,7 ]
Raanani, Ehud [4 ]
Chirirchilli, Ilaria [5 ]
Giebels, Christian [6 ]
Irace, Francesco Giosue [5 ]
De Paulis, Ruggero [2 ,3 ]
Schaefers, Hans-Joachim [6 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] European Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Rome, Italy
[3] San Camillus Int Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Heart Surg, Rome, Italy
[4] Sheba Med Ctr Tel Hashomer, Dept Cardiac Surg, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Osped San Camillo Forlanini, Dept Cardiac Surg, Rome, Italy
[6] Saarland Univ Med Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Homburg, Germany
[7] European Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Via Portuense 700, I-00149 Rome, Italy
来源
INTERDISCIPLINARY CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY | 2024年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
Aortic valve repair; Numerical model; Geometric height; Effective height; Coaptation height; EFFECTIVE HEIGHT; REPLACEMENT; COAPTATION;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivae024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES Aortic valve repair requires the creation of a normal geometry of cusps and aortic root. Of the different dimensions, geometric cusp height is the most difficult to change while annular and sinotubular dimensions can be easily modified. The objective of this study was to investigate, by computer simulation, ideal combinations of annular and sinotubular junction size for a given geometric height.METHODS Based on a literature review of anatomical data, a computational biomechanics model was generated for a tricuspid aortic valve. We aimed to determine the ideal relationships for the root dimensions, keeping geometric height constant and creating different combinations of the annular and sinotubular junction dimensions. Using this model, 125 virtual anatomies were created, with 25 different combinations of annulus and sinotubular junction. Effective height, coaptation height and mechanical cusp stress were calculated with the valves in closed configuration.RESULTS Generally, within the analysed range of geometric heights, changes to the annular diameter yielded a stronger impact than sinotubular junction diameter changes for optimal valve configuration. The best results were obtained with the sinotubular junction being 2-4 mm larger than the annulus, leading to higher effective height, normal coaptation height and lower stress. Within the range tested, stenosis did not occur due to annular reduction.CONCLUSIONS In tricuspid aortic valves, the geometric height can be used to predict ideal post-repair annular and sinotubular junction dimensions for optimal valve configuration. Such an ideal configuration is associated with reduced cusp stress. For the past 6 decades, aortic valve replacement has been the standard treatment for both stenosis and regurgitation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aortic cusp abnormalities in patient with trileaflet aortic valve and root aneurysm
    Ehrlich, Tristan
    Hagendorff, Andreas
    Abeln, Karen
    Froede, Lennart
    Giebels, Christian
    Schaefers, Hans-Joachim
    HEART, 2023, 109 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [22] Relationship of Normal Aortic Valve Cusp Dimensions: A Tool to Optimize Cusp Reconstruction Valvuloplasty
    Subramanian, Sujata
    Tikhomirov, Vsevolod
    Bharati, Saroja
    EiZein, Chawki
    Roberson, David
    Ilbawi, Michel N.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 28 (02) : 521 - 527
  • [23] Aortic valve cusp prolapse before and after valve-sparing aortic root replacement
    Deja, Marek A.
    HEART, 2023, 109 (01) : 8 - 9
  • [24] Results of matching valve and root repair to aortic valve and root pathology
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Batizy, Lillian H.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Gillinov, A. Marc
    Moon, Michael C.
    D'Agostino, Richard S.
    Nadolny, Edward M.
    Stewart, William J.
    Griffin, Brian P.
    Hammer, Donald F.
    Grimm, Richard
    Lytle, Bruce W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 142 (06): : 1491 - U613
  • [25] Durability of Aortic Valve Cusp Repair With and Without Annular Support
    Zeeshan, Ahmad
    Idrees, Jay J.
    Johnston, Douglas R.
    Rajeswaran, Jeevanantham
    Roselli, Eric E.
    Soltesz, Edward G.
    Gillinov, A. Marc
    Griffin, Brian
    Grimm, Richard
    Hammer, Donald F.
    Pettersson, Gosta B.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Sabik, Joseph F., III
    Svensson, Lars G.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (03): : 739 - 748
  • [26] Valve-sparing root reimplantation and leaflet repair in a bicuspid aortic valve: Comparison with the 3-cusp David procedure
    Bavaria, Joseph E.
    Desai, Nimesh
    Szeto, Wilson Y.
    Komlo, Caroline
    Rhode, Tyler
    Wallen, Tyler
    Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 149 (02): : S22 - S28
  • [27] Aortic valve cusp repair does not affect durability of modified aortic valve reimplantation for tricuspid aortic valves
    Hodges, Kevin
    Rosinski, Bradley F.
    Roselli, Eric E.
    Rajeswaran, Jeevanantham
    Griffin, Brian
    Vargo, Patrick R.
    Koprivanac, Marijan
    Tong, Michael
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    JTCVS OPEN, 2023, 16 : 105 - 122
  • [28] From valve-sparing aortic root replacement to aortic root reconstruction: the importance of aortic valve repair
    Laurin, Charles
    Williams, Elbert
    El-Hamamsy, Ismail
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 12 (04) : 364 - 365
  • [29] Valve-sparing aortic root replacement and aortic valve repair in a patient with acromegaly and aortic root dilatation
    Van Praet, Karel
    Mechanick, Jeffrey I.
    Orozco, Vicente
    Stewart, Allan S.
    RUSSIAN OPEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 4 (03)
  • [30] FENESTRATIONS OF THE AORTIC VALVE CUSPS: ARE THEY RELATED TO VARIATIONS IN CUSP SIZE?
    Losenno, K. L.
    Johnson, M.
    Chu, M. W.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : S361 - S361