A comprehensive survey of various methods in opinion spam detection

被引:8
|
作者
Mewada, Arvind [1 ]
Dewang, Rupesh Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Motilal Nehru Natl Inst Technol Allahabad, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Prayagraj 211004, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Natural language processing; Review feature; Reviewer feature; Word representation; Semantic; Part-of-speech; NEURAL-NETWORK; FAKE; REVIEWS; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-022-13702-5
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the development of technology, e-marketing and business competition, reviews significantly affect people's lives. Consumers of e-commerce sites share their experiences, referencing other user reviews when making consumption decisions and evaluating product quality. People's dependence on review information and business competition has triggered the emergence of false reviews. False reviews refer to the promotion or demotion of the quality of the product. False reviews can easily confuse new users' opinions or judgments, due to which both the consumer and the company are affected. Addressing this issue, spam review is a new research problem today, and even humans do not quickly classify spam reviews with high accuracy. Machine learning methods and natural language processing techniques effectively recognise false reviews and help users get benign review information. In this research, we have categorized and classified spam review detection methods in the direction of review features, reviewer features, and the spammer's group features. In this article, we focus on three approaches for detecting false reviews: spam review detection, spammer detection, and spammer-group detection. This article provides a motivational analysis of the three types of research and, in particular, compares them to aspects of feature design, model methods, datasets, and rating indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:13199 / 13239
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comprehensive Survey on Features and Methods for Speech Emotion Detection
    Alva, Yashaswi M.
    Nachamai, M.
    Paulose, Joy
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2015,
  • [32] Various Code Clone Detection Techniques and Tools: A Comprehensive Survey
    Gautam, Pratiksha
    Saini, Hemraj
    SMART TRENDS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, SMARTCOM 2016, 2016, 628 : 655 - 667
  • [33] Opinion Spam - Fake expressions of opinion
    Siegel, Melanie
    INFORMATION-WISSENSCHAFT UND PRAXIS, 2016, 67 (5-6): : 304 - 310
  • [34] A Survey on Event Detection Methods on Various Social Media
    Sreenivasulu, Madichetty
    Sridevi, M.
    RECENT FINDINGS IN INTELLIGENT COMPUTING TECHNIQUES, VOL 3, 2018, 709 : 87 - 93
  • [35] Neural networks for deceptive opinion spam detection: An empirical study
    Ren, Yafeng
    Ji, Donghong
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 385 : 213 - 224
  • [36] SDRN: Scalable Deep Rectifier Network for opinion spam detection
    Sedighi, Zeinab
    Ebrahimpour-Komleh, Hossein
    Bagheri, Ayoub
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICPRAI 2018), 2018, : 535 - 540
  • [37] Mining Weak Relations Between Reviews for Opinion Spam Detection
    Xu, Yingrui
    Liu, Hao
    Ge, Jingguo
    Zhang, Xiaodan
    Hu, Jingyuan
    Wu, Yulei
    Lv, Honglei
    Shi, Hongbin
    Zhou, Wei
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2023, 31 : 152 - 162
  • [38] Opinion Spam Detection in Online Reviews Using Neural Networks
    Archchitha, K.
    Charles, E. Y. A.
    2019 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ICT FOR EMERGING REGIONS (ICTER - 2019), 2019,
  • [39] Opinion Spam Detection in Web Forum: A Real Case Study
    Chen, Yu-Ren
    Chen, Hsin-Hsi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW 2015), 2015, : 173 - 183
  • [40] Collective Opinion Spam Detection: Bridging Review Networks and Metadata
    Rayana, Shebuti
    Akoglu, Leman
    KDD'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2015, : 985 - 994